Design Strategies Impulse Sustainable Facades Vol. 4
The fourth volume of Sustainable Façades, published by the Institute for Design Strategies (TH OWL), explores innovative approaches to sustainable building envelopes. With international contributions and peer-reviewed articles, this issue covers topics such as façade performance, carbon impact, assessment methods, and the role of AI and robotics in construction. It highlights the balance between technological advancement and the preservation of existing buildings, aiming to inspire new connections between research, policy, and practice
The fourth volume of Sustainable Façades, published by the Institute for Design Strategies (TH OWL), explores innovative approaches to sustainable building envelopes. With international contributions and peer-reviewed articles, this issue covers topics such as façade performance, carbon impact, assessment methods, and the role of AI and robotics in construction. It highlights the balance between technological advancement and the preservation of existing buildings, aiming to inspire new connections between research, policy, and practice
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
DESIGN
STRATEGIES
SPECIAL ISSUE Impulses from teaching and research
04.2025
SUSTAINABLE FAÇADES
volume 4 ISSN (Print) 2943-4459
ISSN (Online) 2943-4467
Winter Semester Report
EDITORIAL
Dear Readers,
Welcome to the fourth volume of Sustainable Façades, a Special Issue of the
Design Strategies Magazine published by the Institute for Design Strategies
of TH OWL. Over the past two years, our Editorial Team has undergone slight
changes that we believe have enhanced the quality of this magazine. From
inviting contributors beyond our university to incorporating reviewers for quality
checks, we aim to expand our reach, engage a broader audience, and spark
curiosity across the wide spectrum of topics related to sustainable design and
construction.
In this issue, we feature contributions with perspectives from about a dozen
nationalities, developed within Germany (TH OWL, Schüco International KG,
Werner Sobek AG, DOCOMOMO) and the Netherlands (TU Delft). We continue to
extend an open invitation to other members of our academic and professional
network for future editions.
As always, we present a diverse range of articles exploring multiple aspects of
the construction industry, with a particular focus on the building envelope and its
performance in terms of building physics, carbon footprint, efficient assessment
methods, and cultural implications. In addition, as technology continues to
reshape the built environment, we acknowledge the increasing role of artificial
intelligence and robotics alongside a growing awareness of the value of existing
buildings, highlighting the need for holistic approaches that balances cuttingedge
advancements with the preservation and adaptation of our built heritage
and ancestral knowledge.
We hope this issue inspires new perspectives on the intersections between
research, policy, and practice, and how they shape the future of our cities to
ensure environmental protection, economic growth, and social justice.
Alvaro Balderrama Chiappe
M.Eng., Dipl.-Arch., LEED
Daniel Arztmann
Prof. Dipl.-Ing., M.Eng.
EDITORIAL VORWORT
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
3
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
6
2. LATEST RESEARCH
8 – User Interaction with Smart Glazing: The Effect of Switching Speed Under Overcast Sky Conditions
Pedro Pablo de la Barra Luegmayer, Alessandra Luna Navarro, Eleonora Brembilla, Mark Allen, Ulrich Knaack & Mauro Overend
10 – Noisy Buildings: Review and Case Studies of Sound-Emitting Façades
Alvaro Balderrama
3. ARTICLES
13 – Corvey Digital Identification
Thomaz da Silva Lopes Vieira, Aram Badr, Luis Alfonso Gutierrez Suarez,
Supervisors: Yvonne-Christin Knepper-Bartel, Jens-Uwe Schulz
22 – Exploring Visual Features and Perception of Façades in Residential Neighborhoods of Detmold
Alvaro Balderrama
32 – Hidden Steel Structures in Modern Sacred Architecture: Integrating Academic Opportunities with
Research
Najmeh Najafpour, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uta Pottgiesser
39 – Circular Facade Design: The Importance of end of life scenarios to reduce environmental Impact
Abdelrahman Badr
Supervisors: Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Daniel Arztmann, Dipl.-Ing. Florian Starz, MSc Carmen Herrmann
46 – Energy Efficiency and Environmental Impact in Façade Renovation Strategies for Modern Sacred
Architecture
Najmeh Najafpour
Supervisors: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uta Pottgiesser, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Susanne Schwickert
55 – Integrating Machine Learning with Circular Economy
Bahareh Hemmatikhanshir
64 – Façade Performance and Architectural Design
Sara Hemmatyar
4 CONTENTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
4. MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
71 – MID 1040: Sustainability, Climate and Comfort
Lecturers: Alvaro Balderrama, Manfred Starlinger, Prof. Daniel Arztmann
72 – MID Student Posters:
Anastasiia Krasnikova
Aashish Singh
Bishal Sunar
Erik Karimov
Esraa Ahmed
Kavyashree Govil
Mansi Aggarwal
Marie Al Helou
Nitesh Shresth
Sara Hemmatyar
Sylivia Kanyora
Dila Dil
Omar Shazi Alikkal
Zahra Parsafar
Zahra Tahmasbi
5. EVENTS
103 – Visit to Schüco’s Headquarters / Hands-on Workshop (FWS 50)
104 – Visit to AGC Interpane
105 – Visit to Schüco’s Headquarters / Hands-on Workshop (AOC)
106 – MID Students at BAU 2025
107 – Presentation at 23rd Docomomo Germany Conference
6. IMPRINT
108
CONTENTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
5
1. INTRODUCTION
While innovation plays a crucial role in advancing
sustainable development, the value of construction
methods and materials that have already proven
their worth over time should also be recognized.
Our cover for this Winter Semester Report features
the “Neuer Krug“ in Detmold, a building that
exemplifies aspects of sustainability that are not
always considered nowadays: the preservation of
existing structures, the continuation of traditional
construction and maintenance techniques, and the
respect for local identity.
The Neuer Krug, located at Neustadt 26, has a
long history as a place of hospitality and cultural
significance. Its origins trace back to 1709, when
Count Frederick Adolph of Lippe-Detmold gifted
his wife, Amalie, a plot of land along the newly
constructed Friedrichstaler Kanal. This gift included
authorization to establish an inn, leading to the
creation of the original Neuer Krug. In 1880,
innkeeper Heinrich Dütemeyer acquired the
property and initiated significant expansions. He
commissioned master builder Philipp Knollmann
to construct a new building, resulting in the halftimbered
structure completed in 1889, which still
stands today. Knollmann‘s design was inspired by the
Altes Haus in Bacharach, featuring decorative timber
framing, overhanging gables, and an octagonal
turret in the corner, reflecting the architectural style
of that era.
The Neuer Krug evolved into a vibrant cultural hub,
attracting not only travelers but also artists and
students from the nearby Detmold Academy of Arts
and Crafts (now known as the Detmold School of
Design). Among its notable visitors was the painter
Otto Albert Koch (1866–1921), who, during his time in
Detmold, adorned the inn‘s interior with oil paintings
as payment for his consumption at the inn. Several
of Koch‘s paintings remain preserved within the
establishment to this day.
In 1893, a beer hall was added north of the main
building, constructed in timber by local carpenter
Wilhelm Schmidt. By 1898, the beer hall served as
the foundation for the Detmold Summer Theater
(Sommertheater), further establishing the Neuer
Krug‘s status as a cultural landmark.
Despite various modifications over the years,
including the whitewashing or removal of some
interior artworks, the Neuer Krug has retained
much of its historical character. During the second
half of the 20th century, the building underwent
adaptations to meet evolving needs, with updates
such as improved windows and heating systems
ensuring compliance with modern regulations while
maintaining its essential character. Today, it is a
listed building (A216) and continues to reflect the
city’s cultural heritage.
From a sustainability standpoint, the longevity of
the Neuer Krug serves as a powerful reminder
that the lowest carbon footprint often belongs
to the buildings that already exist. Unlike many
contemporary structures that face demolition within
decades, buildings like this continue to serve their
purpose with relatively low intervention.
The Neuer Krug is featured in this volume of
Sustainable Façades to explore how historical
buildings contribute to contemporary discussions
on sustainability. The economic viability of such
structures lies in their ability to remain functional,
adaptable, and embedded in the cultural fabric
of their surroundings. Traditional materials and
construction techniques can offer valuable
insights for contemporary sustainable design,
demonstrating how craftsmanship and longevity
can inform advancements in façade technology,
energy efficiency, and materials selection. Perhaps,
sustainability is not about choosing between past
and future, but rather about integrating the best
solutions across different eras to create resilient,
efficient, and meaningful buildings.
References
Geoportal Detmold. (n.d.). Denkmal: Neuer Krug (A216).
Retrieved March 3, 2025, from https://geoportal.detmold.
de/130e/api/v1/ext/fda_denkmal/?id=A216
Stiewe, H. (2004). Das Sommertheater am „Neuen
Krug“ in der Detmolder Neustadt. In Detmold um 1900
– Dokumentation eines stadtgeschichtlichen Projekts
(Sonderveröffentlichungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen
und Historischen Vereins für das Land Lippe, Band 72, pp.
441–479). Aisthesis Verlag.
Strohmann, D. (2010). Ölgemälde zur Tilgung einer
Kneipenschuld: Werke des Kunstmalers Otto Albert
Kochs (1866–1921) im „Neuen Krug“. Denkmal-Zeitung, 12
September 2010. Retrieved March 3, 2025, from https://
www.nhv-lippe.de/fileadmin/user_upload/baende-lm/
Strohmann.pdf
Neuer Krug. (n.d.). Geschichte des Neuen Krugs. Retrieved
March 3, 2025, from http://www.neuerkrug.de/Geschichte/
6
INTRODUCTION
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
2. LATEST RESEARCH
7
Latest Research
User Interaction with Smart Glazing: The Effect of Switching Speed
Under Overcast Sky Conditions
Summary of paper published in February 2025 at the Building and Environment Journal, Volume 270
Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112409
Pedro Pablo de la Barra Luegmayer 1 , Alessandra Luna Navarro 1 , Eleonora Brembilla 1 , Mark Allen 1 , Ulrich
Knaack 1 & Mauro Overend 1
1. Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 134, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
Summary
As buildings increasingly incorporate smart
technologies to improve energy efficiency
and occupant comfort, dynamic façades and
switchable glazing have emerged as promising
solutions. These technologies dynamically
regulate daylight, solar heat gain, and privacy,
reducing energy consumption and enhancing
indoor environmental quality. However, a
major challenge remains: user acceptance.
Automated smart glazing systems often operate
without direct user input, which can lead to
dissatisfaction, override behaviors, and reduced
effectiveness in real-world applications. While
previous research has explored user interaction
with automated shading and lighting systems,
limited studies have focused on how users
perceive and react to different transition speeds
and directions in switchable glazing, particularly
under overcast conditions where glare is not
a primary concern. This study aims to fill this
knowledge gap by investigating how the speed
and direction of transitions in liquid crystalbased
smart glazing affect user perception,
satisfaction, and behavior. Understanding these
interactions is crucial to improving the design
and implementation of smart glazing systems
to enhance both user comfort and energy
efficiency.
Participants could manually override the
automated transitions, and their responses were
assessed through questionnaires, behavioral
data, and facial action unit (FAU) analysis.
Research Methodology
The experiment was conducted in a mobile
laboratory (Figure 1) featuring a liquid crystal
dynamic glazing system with two transition
speeds: fast (1 second) and slow (10 seconds).
Thirty participants were exposed to four
scenarios, varying both transition speed and
direction (from dark to clear and vice versa).
Figure 1. (up) floor plan of mobile laboratory; (down)
view of the interior of the mobile laboratory.
8 LATEST RESEARCH
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Key Findings
1. User Perception Remained Unchanged
Participants reported similar levels of satisfaction
across all transition scenarios, indicating that
neither the speed nor direction of transitions
significantly impacted their overall perception of
the environment.
2. Override Behavior Was Influenced by
Transition Direction
More users manually overrode the system when
the glazing transitioned from dark to clear,
suggesting a preference for maintaining a darker
environment under overcast conditions.
3. Faster Transitions Increased Override
Frequency
Regardless of direction, faster transitions
resulted in more frequent overrides, likely due
to the abrupt nature of the change, which may
have been perceived as disruptive (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Time of response of users that have
overridden the façade state.
4. Gaze Behavior Indicated Distraction
Participants consistently directed their gaze
toward the glazing during transitions, regardless
of speed, highlighting a potential distraction
effect (Figure 3).
5. Facial Action Units Revealed Emotional
Responses
FAUs indicated a detectable response to glazing
transitions, though they were not significantly
correlated with user satisfaction.
6. Clustering Analysis Suggested Individual
Differences
Participants grouped by their familiarity
with smart glazing and preferences showed
variation in override behavior, but self-reported
preferences did not strongly predict actual
interactions with the system (Figure 4).
Figure 3. Box-plots to evaluate differences between
users‘ gaze angle during the switching of the glaze
and the rest of the time, and for different speed of
switching.
Implications for Smart Glazing
Design
The study shows the impact of transition
strategies on user discomfort and distraction.
While perception remained largely stable,
behavioral responses indicate that sudden
or undesired transitions can disrupt user
experience. Future designs should consider
customizable transition settings to enhance
acceptability. Additionally, further research could
explore imperceptible transitions and broader
environmental conditions to refine smart glazing
operation for real-world applications.
By integrating user-centered design principles,
smart glazing technologies can be optimized to
improve both energy efficiency and occupant
satisfaction, fostering broader adoption in the
built environment.
Figure 4. Boxplot of the cluster analysis: Cluster
1 represents users that override the automated
control only when the glazing was turned at the
darkest state; while Cluster 2 represents users
that override the automated control only when the
glazing was turned clear.
LATEST RESEARCH
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
9
Latest Research
Noisy Buildings: Review and Case Studies of
Sound-Emitting Façades
Summary of paper published in October 2024 at the Conference Urban Planning & Architectural Design for Sustainable Development
(UPADSD) – 9th Edition, Florence
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386552221_Noisy_Buildings_Review_and_Case_Studies_of_Sound-Emitting_Facades
Alvaro Balderrama 1,2
1. Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany
2. Architectural Façades and Products Research Group, Department of Architectural Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built
Environment, TU Delft, Julianalaan, 134, 2628 Delft, The Netherlands
Summary
With the continuing densification and expansion
of cities in the past decades, urban areas
worldwide are facing unprecedented challenges,
such as an increasing population, environmental
contamination, and the impacts of climatic
events. These issues often drive the development
of autonomous buildings, yet little attention is
given to how these technologies contribute to
noise pollution.
Figure 1. Façade of the Hof der Elemente in
Dresden, Germany. (photo credit: R. Yeap, 2021).
Literature Review: Façades as Sound
Sources
Façades are traditionally studied for their roles
in sound reflection and absorption, but their
potential to emit sound remains unclear. The
following synthesis organized for literature
studies based on the origin of sound produced
at the façade, following the prevailing theory of
sound categorization by Gage et al. (2004) with
three distinct groups: geophonic, biophonic, and
anthrophonic sources.
Figure 2. Green façade between Bandelstraße and
Palaisstraße in Detmold, Germany.
Geophysical Sources – Airborne and structureborne
sounds such as wind-induced noise and
vibrations, thermal expansion of materials, and
precipitation noise like rain (Figure 1 – façade
that introduces geophysical sounds).
Biological Sources - Façades do not produce
biological sounds directly but can encourage the
presence of birds, insects, and other organisms
through green infrastructure (Figure 2 – façade
that can nurture biological sources).
Figure 3. Façade of Building 2 (the Riegel) with
integrated louvers, motorized and deployed
down when light levels are too high or rolled up
otherwise.
10
LATEST RESEARCH
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Anthropological Sources - Noise from human
activities, such as mechanical sounds from
HVAC systems, motorized shading devices, or
electroacoustic systems like loudspeakers and
multimedia façades (Figure 3 – façade with
motorized shading system).
Case Studies in Santa Cruz, Bolivia
In order to provide examples of sound-emitting
façades, site visits were conducted in the city of
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia from December
2023 to July 2024. Three buildings in the city
were selected due to their similarity as highrise
buildings in lower environments, all of
them being located over major roads, and all
producing a different type of sound.
Ambassador Business Center - A 90-meterhigh
office tower with a perforated metal mesh
façade on opposing sides (Figure 4). Santa Cruz
is a windy city and reports suggest the façade
produces a whistling sound in high winds.
Interviews with local residents and occupants
revealed that they are aware of the whistling, and
mainly consider the sounds annoying, however
some found it neutral and even pleasant.
Figure 4. (Left) Ambassador Tower from the
opposite side of San Martín Avenue; (Right) Main
entrance and metallic mesh.
Courthouse (Palacio de Justicia de Santa Cruz
de la Sierra) – A 100-meter-high office building
with numerous split-system air conditioner
units (Figure 5). Noise from air conditioning
compressors is notable at ground level, and
even along surrounding streets, raising concerns
about public health and wellbeing.
Aqua Tower - A residential building with
storefronts on the ground level, including a large
LED screen that emits sound along with video
advertisements. The impact of this multimedia
façade on the local soundscape remains unclear,
as well as its efficacy for increasing commercial
activity.
Figure 5. (Left) Courthouse tower with black
metallic mesh covering hundreds of air conditioning
compressors; (Right) Main entrance to the
courthouse with hung air conditioning units.
Discussion
This paper presents a narrative literature review
classifying sound emissions produced by the
façades of buildings in urban environments,
based on the sound’s origin (geophysical,
biological, or anthropological sources).
Refining and expanding the classification of
sound emissions by façades is recommended,
as well as developing guidelines for the
assessment of façade/building noise footprint
to ease the way for designers, policy makers,
and stakeholders in the construction industry
incorporating soundscape considerations into
upcoming projects.
Figure 6. (Left) Torre Aqua from the opposite side of
the main road; (Right) Store fronts and LED screen.
LATEST RESEARCH
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
11
3. ARTICLES
12 LATEST RESEARCH
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Corvey Digital Identification
Article
Thomaz da Silva Lopes Vieira 1 , Aram Badr 1 , Luis Alfonso Gutierrez Suarez 1 ,
Supervisors: Yvonne-Christin Knepper-Bartel 1 , Jens-Uwe Schulz 1
1. Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany
Abstract
The Corvey Digital Identification project aimed to digitally document and analyze the left annex of the Corvey
UNESCO World Heritage Site to support heritage conservation and adaptive reuse efforts. The project also
served as part of a feasibility study for the potential relocation of the TH-OWL Höxter Campus into the site. A
hybrid methodology was adopted, combining historical plan analysis, terrestrial and aerial photogrammetry,
and LiDAR scanning to create high-resolution architectural documentation. Various scanning technologies,
including stationary laser scanners, backpack-mounted LiDAR, and drone-based photogrammetry, were
used to capture detailed architectural elements while overcoming challenges such as limited accessibility and
complex structural configurations. The segmentation and processing of point cloud data were conducted
manually, ensuring high fidelity in the final deliverables. However, as part of an educational experiment, students
explored AI-based segmentation techniques to investigate the potential of automating facade extraction and
interior object removal. While the AI experiments did not replace manual documentation so far, they provided
insights into future research directions for optimizing heritage recording processes. Additionally, Gaussian
Splatting was tested for real-time visualization, revealing potential applications for virtual heritage experiences.
Beyond its technical contributions, the project provided valuable hands-on training for master’s students in
Computational Design, preparing them for emerging professional challenges in digital heritage documentation
and adaptive reuse planning. The findings highlight the importance of integrating traditional architectural
documentation techniques with emerging technologies, ensuring that historical sites can be preserved with
accuracy while supporting the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings.
Keywords: laser scanning, photogrammetry, revitalization heritage buildings, deep learning, point cloud
1. Introduction
1.1. Historical and Architectural
Background of Corvey
The Carolingian Westwork and Civitas Corvey,
situated along the Weser River in Höxter, Germany,
stands as one of the most significant monastic sites
from the Carolingian period. Officially designated
as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2014, Corvey is
recognized for its exceptional historical, cultural, and
architectural significance, offering a unique window
into the religious and political developments of early
medieval Europe (Unesco, 2014).
Founded in 822 AD under the patronage of Louis the
Pious (son of Charlemagne), Corvey was envisioned
as a major Benedictine monastery and a spiritual
and intellectual hub of the Carolingian Empire. It
was established by monks from the abbey of Corbie
in Picardy (modern-day France), who brought with
them not only religious traditions but also advanced
knowledge of manuscript production, Carolingian
art, and monastic governance. Over the centuries,
Corvey played a pivotal role in Christianizing the
Saxon region, serving as a missionary outpost and a
center of learning (ICOMOS, 2014).
1.2. Architectural Significance of Corvey
The most architecturally significant element of
Corvey is its Carolingian Westwork, which remains
one of the most well-preserved monastic west
façades from the 9th century. The Westwork, a
monumental western entrance structure, is a
defining characteristic of Carolingian and Ottonian
ecclesiastical architecture. Corvey’s Westwork is the
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
13
only surviving example of an authentic Carolingian
Westwork, making it an architectural landmark of
exceptional historical value (ICOMOS, 2014).
The Westwork, constructed between 873 and 885
AD, exhibits the distinctive features of Carolingian
architecture:
• Two towers flanking a central structure, creating
a monumental entrance.
• A high central hall, which was likely used as an
imperial gallery for visiting dignitaries and the
emperor himself.
• A chapel on the upper floor, decorated with
frescoes that combine Carolingian, Byzantine,
and late antique influences.
• A grand entrance hall below, which served as
a transition space between the secular and
sacred realms.
livestock and food production.
• Residences for abbey employees, including lay
workers who managed day-to-day operations.
This part of Corvey exemplifies how monastic
complexes functioned as self-contained economic
and social systems, integrating agriculture,
production, and residential spaces within a single
architectural framework. Over time, as Corvey
transitioned from a monastic hub to a secular
estate, these spaces were repurposed for various
administrative and economic functions, leading to
architectural alterations and adaptations not always
documented.
The symbolism of the Westwork was highly political.
As one of the earliest examples of west-facing
imperial architecture, it was designed to visually
assert the power of the empire, embodying both
religious devotion and royal authority. The upper
gallery, where emperors and nobility would observe
the mass, reflects the close ties between church and
state in the Carolingian world.
Beyond the Westwork, the monastic complex of
Corvey evolved over the centuries to accommodate
economic, agricultural, and residential functions.
The abbey church, originally built in the basilica style,
was a grand space for worship, drawing inspiration
from Roman and Byzantine influences. Though
heavily modified over time, remnants of its original
Carolingian foundations still remain.
Later architectural modifications occurred during:
• The Ottonian period (10th–11th centuries):
The complex was expanded to accommodate
increased monastic activity.
• The Romanesque period (12th–13th centuries):
Additional chapels and extensions were built
in the Romanesque style, featuring rounded
arches and thick stone walls.
• The Baroque period (17th–18th centuries): Some
parts of Corvey were remodeled in the Baroque
style, incorporating ornate facades, frescoes,
and sculptural decorations.
1.3. The Annex and Its Functional
Evolution
The left annex of Corvey, the focus of the Corvey Digital
Identification project, represents an important yet
often overlooked part of the complex. Historically,
this section was essential for the monastery’s selfsufficiency,
serving as:
• A grain storage facility, preserving agricultural
produce from the monastic lands.
• Animal stables, supporting the monastery’s
Figure 1. Drone picture, Annex actual state.
1.4. The Urgency for Digital
Documentation and Adaptive Reuse
The Corvey Digital Identification project was initiated
to digitally document and model this annex, aiming
to achieve several key objectives:
1. Preservation of Historic Heritage: The project
sought to create a high-resolution digital record
of the building to ensure its conservation and to
support architectural revitalization efforts. This
documentation will provide a foundation for adapting
the space for contemporary use while maintaining
its historical integrity.
2. Architectural and Urban Planning Support: The
project was part of a feasibility study to evaluate the
potential relocation of the TH-OWL Höxter campus
to the Corvey site. This required precise architectural
plans of the annex to facilitate spatial planning and
financial analysis.
3. Educational and Technological Advancement:
The initiative aimed to introduce TH-OWL master‘s
students in Computational Design to advanced
digital survey techniques, including photogrammetry
and laser scanning. This provided both theoretical
knowledge and practical experience in real-world
applications.
14 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
1.5. Scientific and Technical Relevance
The digitization of historical architecture has become
a crucial area of research in heritage science and
digital humanities (Hub, 2021). Emerging technologies
such as terrestrial and aerial photogrammetry, laser
scanning, and machine learning-driven segmentation
offer innovative solutions for precise documentation
and automated architectural modeling (Ullas
Rajvanshi, 2019). This study contributes to the field
by exploring the efficiency of these methods in largescale
heritage documentation while also integrating
deep learning techniques for automation.
2. Methodology
2.1. Analysis and Strategy Development
The Corvey Digital Identification project began with
a comprehensive analysis of historical records,
including architectural blueprints, hand-drawn
sketches, and archival documentation related to the
Corvey complex. These sources provided valuable
insight into the construction phases, modifications,
and functional transformations of the annex over
time. Since architectural heritage sites often undergo
undocumented alterations, the project aimed to
establish a comparative analysis between historical
plans and the current state of the structure to
identify discrepancies and lost features.
To complement archival research, field studies
were conducted to verify existing conditions, refine
scanning strategies, and identify potential obstacles
to data collection. These field visits involved on-site
photography, manual sketching, and preliminary
laser scanning tests to assess the accessibility of
specific areas and determine the most effective
scanning workflows for each zone. This preparatory
phase also helped in detecting architectural
irregularities, ensuring that high-priority areas were
identified before the full-scale digital documentation
process began.
A significant challenge in planning the documentation
workflow was the heterogeneous nature of the
annex, which consisted of open-plan spaces,
compartmentalized rooms, and intricate facades.
Some sections, such as large halls, posed fewer
challenges for stationary laser scanning, while
others, particularly residential spaces and storage
areas, required more agile and flexible scanning
methods. Additionally, since the annex had been
used as a storage depot over time, many architectural
elements were partially obscured by objects, boxes,
and debris, necessitating additional efforts to
filter out non-relevant elements and isolate purely
architectural details in the final dataset.
The findings from this initial phase were critical in
shaping the overall scanning strategy, ensuring that
data acquisition was both methodical and efficient.
By carefully considering the historical significance,
functional evolution, and physical constraints of the
annex, the project team developed a workflow that
balanced precision, speed, and adaptability, laying
the foundation for an accurate and comprehensive
digital reconstruction of the site.
2.2. Spatial Division for Documentation
Strategy
Given the complexity and size of the annex, a
systematic spatial division was implemented
to optimize scanning operations. The site was
divided into eight sections (A–H) based on the
existing fire protection walls, which provided a
logical segmentation framework for structured
documentation and fieldwork. This approach
ensured that the scanning tasks were distributed
efficiently, preventing redundancy, data loss, or gaps
in coverage.
The segmentation strategy also influenced the
selection of scanning techniques. Open and largescale
sections were prioritized for stationary laser
scanning, allowing for high-density point cloud data
with minimal distortion. In contrast, residential
spaces and storage areas were allocated for
backpack-mounted mobile LiDAR scanning, which
allowed for greater maneuverability and faster data
collection. The spatial segmentation also allowed for
efficient coordination between different scanning
visits, ensuring that each documented area could be
cross-referenced and integrated seamlessly into the
final dataset.
Figure 2. Masterplan, Annex actual state.
Figure 3. Master Exterior Point Cloud.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
15
Furthermore, the predefined sections facilitated
better alignment between manual and automated
documentation processes. Since different scanning
methods produce datasets with varying levels
of granularity, segmenting the site ensured that
manual CAD-based reconstruction efforts and AIdriven
segmentation trials remained compatible and
complementary.
dimensional accuracy in the photogrammetry point
cloud while relying on LiDAR for precise depth
representation.
2.3. Data Acquisition Techniques and
Workflow
To maximize accuracy and efficiency, a hybrid
approach combining photogrammetry, stationary
laser scanning, and backpack laser scanning was
adopted, depending on the nature of the space.
2.3.1. Façades: Combining Photogrammetry
and Backpack Laser Scanning
Documenting the exterior facades of the annex
required a workflow that captured both highresolution
textures and geometric accuracy.
To achieve this, a hybrid approach integrating
photogrammetry and backpack LiDAR scanning
was implemented, leveraging the strengths of each
method.
The backpack LiDAR scanner provided highly
accurate, dense point clouds (~2mm precision),
making it effective for capturing structural details,
irregular wall surfaces, and overall geometric fidelity.
However, since the available mobile LiDAR system
lacked color information, photogrammetric textures
were incorporated to enhance the visual fidelity of
the dataset.
To optimize data acquisition, scanning was performed
following a linear free-walking path, maintaining an
average distance of 10 meters from the façade, while
allowing for closer scanning of detailed architectural
elements, such as ornamental carvings around
entrances.
Photogrammetry was conducted in three primary
modalities: middle-range and close-range terrestrial
imaging, as well as drone-based aerial imaging. The
terrestrial images captured fine façade material
textures up to the roof gutter, while the dronebased
imaging covered roof details and upper
façade elements that were otherwise inaccessible. A
deliberate trade-off was made between minimizing
general façade distortion and capturing local depth
accuracy in the photogrammetry point cloud.
Capturing images parallel to the façade significantly
reduces global distortions, such as the ‚banana
effect,‘ which can occur when images are taken at
oblique angles. However, this approach inherently
compromised the depth accuracy of individual
architectural elements in the photogrammetric
reconstruction. Since the laser scanner provided
highly precise depth data, the decision was made to
exclusively capture parallel façade images, prioritizing
Figure 4. Challenges Photogrammetry, banana
effect.
The image acquisition strategy included the following
steps:
1. Target placement at 10-meter intervals to aid in
image alignment across multiple datasets.
2. Terrestrial photographs captured at two distances:
• 10 meters away: Parallel shots ensuring 30%
image overlap.
• 20 meters away: Additional parallel shots for
overall registration.
3. Detailed entrance scans using a semi-circular
shooting path, ensuring comprehensive capture of
ornamental features.
4. Drone imaging performed parallel to the façade
and from top to bottom.
The final integration of LiDAR point cloud data and
photogrammetric textures was conducted manually,
combining the structural precision of LiDAR scanning
with the visual richness of photogrammetry. This
process resulted in a highly detailed, geometrically
precise dataset, suitable for both architectural
analysis and heritage conservation applications.
Figure 5. General strategy for external registration.
(1) drone scans, (2) and (3) photogrammetry and (4)
scanners.
2.3.2. Interior Spaces: Categorization and
Scanning Techniques
Documenting the interior spaces of the annex
required a structured approach that accounted
for variations in room size, layout, and accessibility
constraints. To optimize data collection, a hybrid
scanning strategy was employed, dividing interior
spaces into two categories: open-plan spaces
16 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
and compartmentalized areas. Each category was
assigned the most suitable scanning technology,
ensuring high-fidelity documentation while
minimizing data acquisition time.
The stationary laser scanner was selected for large
open-plan spaces, as it provided high-resolution,
colorized point clouds with superior geometric
precision. This method was particularly effective
for capturing architectural details in areas with
unobstructed sightlines, such as halls and large
rooms. To ensure complete spatial coverage, scanning
positions were strategically planned, with each scan
overlapping by 30–50% to facilitate seamless data
integration. While this approach yielded high-quality,
detailed spatial data, its primary limitation was time
efficiency, as each scan required approximately 10
minutes depending on the resolution settings.
In contrast, backpack-mounted LiDAR scanning
was used for compartmentalized spaces, such as
narrow corridors, small rooms, and storage areas.
This method allowed for rapid data acquisition,
significantly reducing scanning duration compared
to stationary setups. The scanner was operated
while walking at a steady pace, ensuring continuous
data capture throughout connected spaces.
However, due to the motion-based nature of this
technique, alignment issues were encountered
when transitioning between rooms, particularly
at doorways. Since real-time corrections were not
possible, these errors had to be addressed during
post-processing.
To mitigate point cloud misalignment, multiple
experimental scanning techniques were tested:
1. Center-first rotation: Upon entering a room, the
operator moved to the center and performed a 360°
rotation before proceeding.
2. Spiral walk pattern: The operator followed a
circular path along the perimeter, gradually moving
toward the center.
3. Doorway stop-and-turn: Before entering a new
space, the operator stopped at the threshold,
performed a 360° scan, then continued walking.
Despite these adjustments, none of the techniques
fully eliminated misalignment issues, making manual
corrections during post-processing essential. To
address these inaccuracies, reference photographs
and 360° panoramic images were used to verify
architectural elements, ensuring that all structural
components were accurately represented.
Additionally, hand sketches and field notes played a
crucial role in distinguishing permanent architectural
features from temporary objects, such as storage
materials and debris, which were not relevant to
the final documentation. Finally, CAD-based manual
adjustments were applied to realign misregistered
point cloud sections, refining spatial accuracy and
ensuring seamless integration between different
datasets.
Figure 6. (General strategy for internal registration,
LiDAR scanning section D).
3. Data Processing & Architectural
Plan Generation (Level 1)
Due to the limited timeframe of the project, a small
team of student workers was assembled under
direct supervision to ensure the timely delivery of
scaled 2D architectural drawings for the architecture
office responsible for the TH-OWL Höxter Campus
planning. Given the complexity of the annex and
the need for highly precise documentation, a
manual processing approach was chosen to extract
architectural features from the point cloud data with
maximum accuracy.
3.1. Manual Processing Approach
The processing workflow consisted of importing
point cloud data into CAD software (Rhinoceros),
where it was manually analyzed and converted into
floor plans and sectional drawings. This approach,
while labor-intensive, was necessary to meet the
practical requirements of the project under time
constraints.
Step 1: Data processing and Point Cloud
Generation
The point cloud generation process involved
the integration of two main tools: FARO Scene
and RealityCapture, each serving distinct but
complementary roles in processing and refining
spatial data. FARO Scene was primarily used
for handling 3D laser scans, ensuring accurate
alignment and registration of point clouds obtained
from terrestrial LiDAR and a backpack scanner. The
processing workflow included both cloud-to-cloud
registration aligning multiple scans without the use
of targets and target-based registration, which relied
on checkerboards to achieve precise alignment.
Additionally, the software facilitated data cleaning,
clipping, and cropping, allowing for the extraction of
relevant portions of the dataset. Further refinement
involved 3D mesh and surface modeling, converting
point clouds into structured models suitable for CAD
and other modeling applications.
In parallel, RealityCapture processed data captured
from cameras and drone images. Once imported,
the images were aligned to generate an initial
sparse point cloud, a crucial step in establishing
spatial relationships within the dataset. To ensure
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
17
accuracy in reconstruction, this alignment was
then scaled using markers. The refinement process
continued with mesh generation and dense point
cloud processing, incorporating filtering techniques
and model cleanup to eliminate unnecessary data.
To enhance the visual fidelity of the model, texture
baking was applied, enriching the final output
before it was exported as either a textured OBJ
mesh or a dense point cloud in PLY format. Finally,
multiple components were merged to provide
a comprehensive, unified representation of the
building.
levels, staircases, and most importantly, the
configuration of the wooden roof trusses and
structural framework. Given the feasibility
study for potential architectural modifications,
such as the addition of insulation or a new
roofing system, understanding the load-bearing
capacity of the existing structure was crucial.
The extracted sections enabled engineers to
assess structural capacity and determine where
additional reinforcements might be required to
accommodate new architectural demands.
• Horizontal slices (floor plan sections) were
used to identify doorways, windows, and other
architectural openings at different height
levels, ensuring these features were accurately
mapped in the 2D plans.
For floor plan generation, a three-layer horizontal
slicing approach was implemented, each focusing
on different architectural components to
improve interpretation and precision in the final
documentation:
Figure 7 . (RealityCapture Photogrammetry
workflow, Drone camera position).
Step 2: Point Cloud Import and Pre-Processing
The raw point clouds were imported into Rhinoceros
(CAD software) for further processing. Given the
high density of the dataset, an initial downsampling
phase was conducted to reduce file size while
preserving critical architectural details. This process
was carried out using Cockroach, a Grasshopper
plugin specialized in point cloud optimization,
along with additional Grasshopper add-ons for
adaptive simplification. These tools enabled efficient
noise reduction and segmentation, enhancing the
distinction between architectural and structural
components.
Figure 8. (Downsampling with Segmentation).
Step 3: Slicing Methodology for Architectural
Feature Extraction
To define the structural boundaries of walls,
openings, and other key architectural elements, the
point cloud was systematically sectioned into both
vertical and horizontal slices, allowing for a more
detailed spatial analysis and feature extraction.
• Vertical slices (cross-sections) were generated
primarily for the creation of architectural
sections, providing critical insight into the
building’s structural composition. These
slices were essential in identifying floor
1. Lower Horizontal Slice (1.5m above the ground,
extending downward to the floor level):
• This slice provided a general overview of the
room’s layout, ensuring that variations in floor
levels, staircases, and sunken areas were
properly captured.
• Additionally, it accounted for window parapets to
avoid misrepresentations in elevation changes.
2. Mid-Level Horizontal Slice (20cm thickness around
1.5m height):
• The purpose of this slice was to precisely
capture the positions of windows and doors,
independent of window parapets.
• By slicing just above the parapet level, the team
avoided misinterpretations that could occur
when parapets obscure the true dimensions of
openings.
3. Upper Horizontal Slice (20 cm thickness close to
the ceiling):
• This slice ensured a clean representation of the
room’s perimeter, minimizing visual obstructions
caused by furniture and stored objects.
• Since many rooms contained large objects and
clutter, capturing a section near the ceiling
allowed for a clear definition of wall boundaries
without interference.
Figure 9. (multi-slice methodology).
18 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
This multi-slice methodology significantly improved
the accuracy of architectural feature extraction,
ensuring that structural elements were represented
with minimal ambiguity in the final 2D drawings.
Figure 10. (Challenge caused by noise).
Figure 14. (Courtyard Facade Drawings).
Figure 15. (Architectural drawings section H).
3.2. Challenges and Considerations
Figure 11. (slice methodology, elevation and
sections).
Step 4: Hand-Tracing of Architectural Features
Once the slices were generated, the team manually
traced over the structural lines in CAD software. This
included:
• Precisely delineating walls, openings, and loadbearing
structures.
• Ensuring dimensional accuracy by referencing
point cloud depth data.
• Cross-verifying different sectional views to
maintain consistency between floors and
elevations.
This process requires a high level of attention to
detail, as misinterpretations of the point cloud data
could lead to errors in the final architectural plans.
While the manual approach ensured precision, it was
time-intensive and demanded significant effort from
the team. The primary challenges included:
1. Complexity of Structural Elements and
Misinterpretation of Furniture
• In certain sections of the annex, the complexity
was further increased by the roof structure
and numerous wooden profiles, making it even
more challenging to accurately interpret the
point cloud data. Additionally, architectural
alterations and built-in furniture complicated
the identification of actual structural walls.
Some large storage units, shelving systems,
and cabinetry were tightly affixed to walls,
making them indistinguishable from structural
elements in the point cloud data. This required
additional manual verification using field
notes, 360 panoramas, photographs, and
cross-referencing with historical plans to avoid
incorrectly mapping furniture as permanent
walls in the final architectural drawings.
2. Point Cloud Density and Noise
Figure 12. (From point clouds to 2D drawings).
• High-density scans provided detailed
information, but also introduced visual
clutter, making it challenging to isolate critical
architectural elements.
4. Research on Automation and
Deep Learning Techniques (Level 2)
Figure 13. (Orthophoto from Photogrammetry &
Drawings).
The Corvey Digital Identification project explored
AI-driven methods to automate architectural
documentation, aiming to improve segmentation
accuracy and reduce manual labor. Experimental
studies were conducted, focusing on point cloud
segmentation, object removal, and automated 2D
drawing generation.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
19
4.1. Automated Facade Segmentation
• Goal: Identify walls, windows, and decorative
elements in dense facade point clouds.
• Method: Applied RANSAC plane segmentation
for detecting main walls and DBSCAN clustering
to isolate architectural elements.
• Findings: Effective for large-scale segmentation
but struggled with recessed features, requiring
manual adjustments.
4.4. Automatic 2D Contour Generation
with Fresnel Node
• Goal: Automate the conversion of point clouds
into 2D elevation drawings.
• Method: Utilized Blender’s Fresnel Node to
extract object outlines based on light interaction.
• Findings: Provided a faster alternative to manual
tracing but required additional scripting for
cleaner output.
Figure 16. (Plane Segmentation + DBSCAN
Clustering, Student work: Maja Ripploh & Özge
Türedi).
4.2. Facade Segmentation & Interior
Object Removal
• Goal: Improve facade segmentation and
automate the removal of non-architectural
objects from interior point clouds.
• Method: Used Grounding DINO, SAM (Segment
Anything Model), and Mask3D for facade
classification and DBSCAN clustering for filtering
furniture.
• Findings: Successfully removed large objects
but had difficulty distinguishing built-in features
from structural walls.
Figure 17. (Deep Learning Segmentation using
ScanNet200 Dataset, Student work: Yusuf Aykin).
4.3. Photogrammetry vs. Gaussian
Splatting for Documentation
• Goal: Compare photogrammetry and Gaussian
Splatting (GS) for architectural documentation.
• Method: Used RealityCapture for
photogrammetry and PolyCam & SuperSplat for
GS.
• Findings: Photogrammetry produced highaccuracy
meshes but required significant
computation, whereas GS enabled realtime
visualization but lacked precision for
documentation.
Figure 18. (Object contours vary based on viewing
angles).
5. Discussion
The Corvey Digital Identification project
demonstrated the effectiveness of hybrid digital
documentation, integrating manual CAD-based
processing with optimization algorithms and AIdriven
segmentation techniques. The results
highlight both the strengths and limitations of
these approaches in heritage documentation and
architectural analysis.
5.1. Accuracy and Efficiency in Manual
vs. Automated Processing
The manual CAD workflow produced precise
architectural drawings, particularly in floor plan
and section extraction, but was labor-intensive.
Optimization and AI-driven segmentation algorithms
showed promise in automating feature extraction,
particularly for object segmentation and interior
cleaning. However, these techniques struggled
with complex architectural details (e.g., embedded
windows, built-in furniture, and decorative elements),
requiring manual refinements.
While AI cannot yet replace manual documentation,
hybrid workflows—where optimization and/or AI preprocesses
point clouds before human verification—
can significantly reduce manual effort and enhance
efficiency in large-scale projects.
5.2. Challenges and Future Directions
in AI-Assisted Heritage Documentation
Automating architectural segmentation proved
challenging due to the complexity of historical
structures, where architectural elements often blend
into their surroundings. The project underscores AI’s
growing role in architectural documentation, while
emphasizing the need for hybrid workflows that
20 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
balance automation with manual expertise.
• Facade segmentation effectively isolated main
surfaces but struggled with recessed elements
due to overlapping planes.
• Interior object removal successfully eliminated
large furniture but had difficulty distinguishing
built-in features from structural walls.
• Further AI training: Developing custom
datasets for historical buildings could enhance
segmentation accuracy, improving feature
extraction and classification. Combining AIbased
detection with manual validation can
improve efficiency without compromising
precision.
• Gaussian Splatting revealed high potential for
real-time visualization, making it particularly
useful for interactive heritage applications, as its
high-speed rendering and photorealistic scene
representation allow for seamless immersive
virtual tours, enabling users to explore historic
spaces interactively in VR or web-based
platforms without the computational limitations
of traditional 3D mesh models, offering a
scalable and efficient solution for remote cultural
heritage experiences and digital preservation.
6. Conclusions
The Corvey Digital Identification project successfully
documented and digitized the left annex of the
Corvey UNESCO site, producing precise architectural
floor plans and sections that supported the
Höxter campus feasibility study. The manual CAD
workflow ensured high-quality deliverables, while
the experimental AI-driven research provided
insights into automation possibilities for heritage
documentation.
Beyond its technical achievements, the project
also played a crucial role in education, introducing
master’s students in Computational Design to
cutting-edge digital documentation techniques,
including photogrammetry, LiDAR scanning, and
AI-based segmentation. By engaging students
in real-world challenges, the project provided
hands-on experience with emerging technologies,
preparing them for the evolving demands of the
professional architectural and computational design
industries. The integration of manual and AI-driven
workflows allowed students to critically assess the
limitations and potential of automation in heritage
documentation, equipping them with a balanced
perspective on traditional and future methodologies.
While manual processing remains essential for
accuracy, the experiments with machine learning and
optimization-based segmentation demonstrated
the potential for automation in feature extraction,
object removal, and facade segmentation. Future
work should focus on refining AI models with
architectural datasets, integrating hybrid workflows,
and leveraging real-time visualization techniques
such as Gaussian Splatting for immersive digital
heritage applications.
7. Acknowledgments
This project was made possible through the
dedication and collaboration of a multidisciplinary
team, including faculty members, research assistants,
and master’s students. Their collective expertise
and commitment to digital heritage documentation,
computational design, and adaptive reuse strategies
were essential to the success of the Corvey Digital
Identification project.
Project Managers
• Dipl. Arq/Urb M. Eng. Thomaz da Silva Lopes
Vieira
• Prof. Dr. Ing. Yvonne-Christin Knepper-Bartel
• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Jens-Uwe Schulz
Student Research Assistants
Special thanks to our research assistants for
their invaluable contributions to data acquisition,
processing, and documentation:
• Luis Alfonso Gutierrez Suarez
• Aram Badr
External Support
We also extend our gratitude to:
• Yingwen Yu (PhD Candidate - TU Delft)
for generously providing access to the backpack
laser scanner and collaborating with us during the
digital documentation phase.
Master’s Students – MID S9 Course
A heartfelt appreciation goes to the master‘s
students of the S9 course, whose dedication to
exploring digital heritage methodologies and AIassisted
segmentation brought valuable insights to
the research:
• Maryam Nafez, Zahra Mohebbi, Mostafa Hamdy,
Edgardo Rodriguez Altamirano, Shinu Thomas,
Omar Abdelhady, Marzie Molaei Maqsoudbeki,
Maja Ripploh, Türedi Özge, Rebal Jaber, Israfil
Taslibeyaz, Aykin Yusuf, Acar Kiymet, Salah EL
Kassar, Elizabeth Parejo.
Their contributions in field data collection,
computational experimentation, and architectural
documentation were instrumental in achieving the
project’s objectives.
8. References
Hub, H. R. (2021). Digital technology and heritage:
Challenges and issues. s.n.
ICOMOS. (2014). Nomination dossier: Carolingian Westwork
and Civitas Corvey, inscribed, s.l.: ICOMOS - International
Council on Monuments and Sites Paris, ICOMOS.
Rajvanshi, U., & V. R. V. (2019). Automatic generation of floor
plans for indoor navigation using. s.n.
UNESCO. (2014). UNESCO World Heritage Convention.
https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1447/
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
21
Article
Exploring Visual Features and Perception of Façades in Residential
Neighborhoods of Detmold
Alvaro Balderrama 1,2
1. Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany
2. Architectural Façades and Products Research Group, Department of Architectural Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built
Environment, TU Delft, Julianalaan, 134, 2628 Delft, The Netherlands
Abstract
The visual perception of building façades plays a crucial role in shaping human experience in cities, and the debate
of concepts like aesthetics, beauty and visual quality have been going on for centuries. However, systematic
methods for assessing the visual features of buildings and their emotional impact remain underdeveloped. This
study presents an exploratory methodology for assessing the visual features and visual perception of residential
façades. Taking houses of the 32756 area of Detmold, Germany, the research primarily aims to test and refine
methods for surveying both objective visual attributes and subjective perceptual responses. A database of
façade photographs was created following predefined selection criteria, and two consecutive surveys were
conducted focused on 20 façades. In the first stage, participants (n=22) generated descriptive terms to capture
natural emotional reaction to photographs of different façades; in the second survey, a different group (n=12)
rated façades using bipolar scales, first with 23 visual features and 25 perceptual attributes. The results show
patterns between the physical characteristics of façades and their affective descriptors (e.g. pleasantness and
cleanness, safety, and vegetation). While findings reveal a series of relationships between visual features and
perceptual scales, the primary goal of the study was to test the approach of gathering visual and perceptual
data with small groups of professionals. Future research could build on this methodology by expanding the
sample size, refining survey instruments, and applying statistical modeling techniques to better understand the
links between visual features and human perception of façades.
Keywords: residential buildings, cityscape, view, vision, sight, aesthetics
1. Introduction
The visual perception of building façades plays a
critical role in shaping our urban environments and
influencing how people experience architecture
(Scruton, 1979). While the functional aspects of
façades such as structural integrity and energy
performance are well regulated, their visual
qualities remain more subjective and harder to
quantify. With increasing attention being paid to
the relationship between architectural design and
human experience, understanding how people
perceive façades becomes essential for architects,
urban planners, and researchers in environmental
psychology.
The façades of buildings act as an interface between
outdoor and indoor areas, influencing how we
interpret the spaces around us (Knaack et al., 2007).
The word façade’s etymological origin stems from
Latin ‘facies’, which means face, and generally refers
to the exterior face of a building (Bahar et al., 2022).
The façade not only acts as a barrier separating the
interior from the exterior, but constitutes the most
prominent element of building design, defining its
aesthetic character and conveying symbolic meaning
(Lovell 2010). The design of façades, therefore, is a
critical component in environmental comfort (Klein,
2013). The aesthetic of our built environment is an
important aspect for the design of human-centered
cities, but a problem quickly arises in the presence
of clashing conceptions of what we understand to be
aesthetically pleasing, or, when is a façade beautiful
(Prieto and Oldenhave, 2021).
22 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
This study seeks to test an exploratory methodology
for surveying façade visual features and people’s
affective response. The main research question
addressed is: how to survey the visual aspect of
façades in terms of physical visual features and
perceived affective quality? A series of sub-questions
follow up:
SQ1. How related are literature-based perceptual
descriptors and the affective language naturally
used by proficient English speakers when evaluating
façades?
SQ2. Which façades are the more and less preferred
by participants, and are there patterns that emerge
between the physical visual properties of façades
and their subjective evaluation?
SQ3. How well did the proposed indicators and
descriptors perform, and is it effective to conduct
a survey with professional participants to analyze
visual features of façades (expertise-based), as well
as perceptual affective quality (perception-based)?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Background of Visual Quality
Assessments
The visual quality of the environment has likely
influenced human decisions about site selection and
development from the very beginning of settlements
and formation of routes. According to Daniel (2001),
even in early human civilizations, appreciation for
locations with little or no association to food, water,
or shelter existed.
As described by Polat (2015), Plato (427/428 - 347
B.C.E) was the first philosopher to methodically
examine the concept of “beauty”. In Plato’s view,
beautiful things are not objects in the universe
but rather ideas that transcend the material world.
However, shortly after, his student Aristotle (384
- 322 B.C.E.) discussed a different approach that
focused on the material world and how quality exists
within objects themselves. He explored the idea
that beauty originates from order, symmetry, and
definiteness/clearness, and could be explained with
mathematics.
The term “aesthetics”, coined in the Eighteenth
Century, was developed to examine the relationship
between environmental qualities and human
sensibility. Research on the atmosphere was the focus
of this aesthetics because atmospheres constitute
the “In-between” between environmental qualities
and human sensibilities (Böhme, 2000). Aesthetics
originally designated, among other things, a kind of
object, a kind of judgment, a kind of attitude, a kind
of experience, and a kind of value; and later came
to name an entire field of philosophical research
(Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022).
In the construction sector, aesthetics is mainly
associated to visual quality, however by definition,
the aesthetics of a façade would not only consider
the visual aspect, but also the other senses that
affect someone’s experience in that context.
In the Twentieth Century the field of visual assessment
emerged to address planning needs arising from
policy (Daniel, 2001). The U.S. National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 catalyzed the advancement of
a research community and subsequent policies
(USDA, 1974; USDI, 1980). As a result, for decades,
environmental management practices mainly
focused on expert-based approaches to measure
and evaluate not only which landscape condition
looks better but also by how much (Palmer and
Hoffman, 2001).
Indices of landscape quality are based on overt
choices, rankings or ratings of landscape (usually
represented with photographs) provided by samples
of human viewers. Generally, high levels of reliability
have been achieved when compared to the expert/
design approach, with the inclusion of groups of
people between 5 and 30 (Brown and Daniel, 1987;
Palmer, 1997). Changes between landscapes are
noticeable in the results of assessments that use
multiple attributes describing their interpretation
of the scenes. Studies regarding people’s visual
perception can involve the use of images (e.g.
photographs) and questionnaires designed using
the semantic differentials method, allowing them
to measure a series of attributes that describe the
visual features in the image with points in a scale.
In recent decades, the importance of perceptual
and subjective dimensions have been recognized
by researchers in environmental psychology. A
second paradigm of landscape aesthetics theory
began to develop from psychological perspectives
on landscape preference (Bourassa, 1988; Daniel
and Boster, 1976; Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989; Ulrich,
1986), diverging from the expert-based approach.
Perceptual methodologies gather human responses
through surveys, visual assessments, or interviews,
are essential for capturing the multiple ways people
interpret architectural elements.
Both paradigms now form the basis of contemporary
landscape assessment methods: the “objective”
paradigm applied in 20th-century policy, where
visual quality is inherent to landscape properties,
and the “subjective” paradigm where visual quality is
“in the eye of the beholder” (Lothian, 1999).
Daniel (2001), argued that a division between expert
descriptive methods and public preference models
is noticeable in landscape assessment research,
inherited from the philosophical debates of aesthetics
and beauty, but that visual quality assessments are
most effective when they incorporate both objective
and perceptual variables.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
23
2.2. Current Approaches to Visual
Quality Assessment
At the turn of the century, interest increased in
visual assessment methods with scenic beauty of
the landscape becoming an important component
of planning practices and management strategies
(Scott, 2002). The field known as Landscape Visual
Quality (LVQ) rose from the relationship between
physical properties of the landscape and the
influence of the properties on human respondents
and their perceptions. LVQ can be defined as
“relatively aesthetic excellence of a landscape” and
it can be measured through the appreciation of an
observer (Lothian 1999; Daniel 2001; De La Fuente
et al., 2006). Both qualitative and quantitative
parameters are useful to depict LVQ (Lee and Ng,
2024).
Several visual assessment protocols have been
developed, and significant advancements have been
made in assessing the visual quality of landscapes
(Gobster et al., 2019). The main current methods for
assessing landscape preference can be classified as
three approaches:
• Expert/design approach (objective paradigm)
• Perceptual/public approach (subjective paradigm)
• Expert/Public approach (psychophysical paradigm)
These categories somewhat coincide with the two
main aspects of façade aesthetics proposed by
Prieto and Oldenhave (2021) after conducting a series
of semi-structured interviews with professionals.
Intrinsic aspects pertain to the inherent qualities of
the façade itself, encompassing elements such as
composition, materiality, and detail design. These
characteristics are typically quantifiable and focus
on the façade as an autonomous object. Conversely,
extrinsic aspects involve the façade‘s relationship
with external factors, including its physical context
and the perceptions of observers, indicating the
subjective associations that contribute to aesthetic
appreciation of façades.
It is important to consider that in all the approaches,
the judgment of a human is still needed to survey
the environment, therefore, it is still very difficult
to measure fully objectively. On the other hand,
measuring perceptual constructs that are so
vulnerable to individual characteristics, also makes
subjective approaches difficult to use (Prieto and
Oldenhave, 2021).
According to Daniel (2001), the subjective approach
seems to have largely won out in modern philosophy,
with a much higher apparent accuracy in key
studies, where in the objective approach, small/
individual changes between landscape are not easily
noticeable. In the perceptual approach individual
cases are more recognizable providing wider and
more precise result. However, a reasonable and
popular resolution of the objective-subjective
controversy in the context of visual landscape
aesthetic quality assessment is to acknowledge
that quality depends on both the visual features
of the landscape and the psychological processes
(perceptual, cognitive) experienced by the observer.
Despite this acknowledgment, exactly which sensory
perceptions, cognitive interpretations, and/or
emotions/feelings are most relevant to aesthetic
quality remains a matter of debate.
2.3. Insights for developing façade
visual quality assessment methods
An overview of the research fields of landscape
visual quality (LVQ), soundscape, and other
environmental sciences provides valuable insights
into assessing the visual quality of façades in terms
of structural integrity but also of social significance.
LVQ studies acknowledge the coexistence of distinct
approaches: the objective perspective, focusing
on measurable physical attributes; the subjective
perspective, centering on human perception and
cognitive responses; and a converging operation for
a physical/psychological approach. This is somewhat
comparable to soundscape research, where the
acoustic environment is the physical aspect, and the
soundscape is the perceptual aspect.
Intrinsic aspects of façades, as described in Prieto
and Oldenhave (2021), include their geometrical
and material properties. Intrinsic attributes define
the façade as an object and determine its physical
characteristics. Extrinsic aspects consider the
relations of façades and the urban fabric, as well as
the way they influence people’s visual perception,
and through sight and other senses.
In order to develop a methodology that follows the
psychophysical approach, a convergence of both
approaches is proposed with the aim to explore
the relationship between visual features and visual
perception. Medeiros et al. (2023) proposed criteria to
ensure indicators reflect the essential characteristics
of visual quality without redundancy or excessive
complexity, however still statistically related
between the objective and subjective indicators. It is
essential to ensure that the selected indicators and/
or descriptors are not only theoretically grounded
but also adaptable to diverse architectural contexts
and scales, and with terminologies that reflect what
people say in real-world scenarios.
While LVQ traditionally relied on photographs and
static visual representations for assessments,
recent advancements in technology offer additional
opportunities. Photographic and static image-based
evaluations remain a valid and accessible method.
However, emerging technologies such as Virtual
Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) offer new
dimensions and are becoming more accessible
every year. These technologies also support
multisensory assessments, typically using binaural
sound compatible or integrated with the VR headset,
suitable for soundscape assessment (Botteldooren
24 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
et al., 2023; Llorca-Bofí et al., 2022). Additionally,
modifying room parameters such as temperature
or air quality to analyze in the experiment is
also possible to reveal multisensory interactions
(Martinez-Alcaraz et al., 2025).
3. Methodology
Based on the growing body of literature, it can be
agreed that evaluations of the visual environment
gathered through surveys are valuable tools,
whether its among trained observers or general
public. Nevertheless, the methodological procedure
remains underdeveloped in façade-specific research.
This methodology presents an exploratory approach
to survey visual features and perceptual affect by
working with professional participants.
The participants for these surveys were recruited
by the author within the network of the university.
English proficiency was a requirement for the survey.
All participants already held professional degrees in
fields like architecture, civil engineering, mechanical
engineering, and construction. They were informed
that their participation would be entirely anonymous
and voluntary with no compensation. Informed
consent and socio-demographic data was provided
by all participants.
3.1. Photographic campaigns
A series of photographic campaigns were carried
out during September 2024 in the city of Detmold, in
the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The
32756 postal code area was selected for this study,
since it is predominantly residential, aside from
some commercial and industrial space around the
historical city center.
A photographic database of houses was compiled
based on pre-determined criteria: (i) the façade and
building look like a house and not have distracting
billboards or texts; (ii) the building is a low-rise
construction up to a height of about 15 meters; (iii)
ideally, the building does not have a fence or front
lawn or other objects that interfere with the view
of the façade; (iv) the pictures were taken from a
perpendicular location, at an ideal distance of 10
meters (limits between 5-15 meters). Figure 1 shows
a mosaic of 110 houses after post processing to have
clear sky in every picture.
The database of façades in Detmold does not
publicly disclose the exact location of the houses
for privacy issues. The creation of the database is
justified primarily for this research project, which
includes this article and potential follow-up research.
Additionally, the database is intended to be used
for future academic purposes in the context of the
Master of Integrated Design (MID) program, and the
Institute for Design Strategies (IDS).
3.2. Survey procedure
From the total of 156 houses of the database, a sample
of 20 houses was selected for the next steps of this
paper as a pilot study. The pictures were labeled
randomly from 1 to 156. Façades 1 to 20 were used
for this pilot study. The houses were selected due to
variations in the visual character (e.g. different styles,
time of construction, materials, condition). Next, two
surveys (attribute generation, and assessment of
visual features and visual perception) were carried
out, with on-site participation in a classroom at the
Detmold School of Design in two separate days of
October 2024. Participants in a classroom had the
full-screen pictures projected on the wall, and had to
use individual laptops to carry out the assignment.
For the attribute generation survey, participants
(n=22; female 40%; mean age: 26) used the online
tool Mentimeter providing three words for each
picture.
For the survey of visual features and perception,
participants (n=12; female 50%; mean age: 25)
received a spreadsheet to input the visual features
between 0 and 2, and the perceptual values between
-3 and 3 for each façade.
3.3. Data analysis
The results of the surveys were used to create two
datasets in spreadsheet format. Then, the data was
processed using a Python code developed for this
study, to visualize the results through boxplots,
heatmaps, and bar graphs. The code will be shared
in the project’s GitHub repository “Digital Toolbox for
Façade Acoustics and Soundscape Assessment”.
4. Results
4.1. Survey for attribute generation
To identify affective descriptors relevant to the
perception of façades used by practitioners, a
preliminary survey was conducted with a first group
of twenty-two (n=22) participants. They were shown
the 20 selected photographs and asked to write
three words that described their perception of each
image.
This methodology draws the basic principle from
Axelsson’s Towards a Psychology of Photography:
Dimensions Underlying Aesthetic Appeal of
Photographs (Axelsson, 2007), where he surveyed
people in order to generate attributes that describe
visual quality to use later in the development of rating
scales to survey a second group of participants.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
25
26 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Figure 1. Samples from the database of façades.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
27
Boring–Entertaining, Gloomy–Cheerful, Ordinary–
Sophisticated, Common–Unique, Chaotic–
Calm, Unplanned–Planned, Simple–Complex,
Unbalanced–Balanced, Confusing–Understandable,
Not Historical–Historical, Old–New, Traditional–
Contemporary, Unsafe–Safe, Uncomfortable–Cozy,
Dark–Bright, Open–Closed, Opaque–Transparent,
and Hidden–Exposed.
4.2.1. Visual features
Figure 2. Examples of word clouds for four different
façades in the attribute generation survey.
The results provided a total 1184 entries for the 20
pictures. After removing duplicates and grouping
alike words (e.g. symmetric and symmetrical, or
pleasant and plesant and very pleasant), a narroweddown
list of 296 words was obtained. From those,
142 terms were only used one, so there were 154
terms used at least twice.
The dataset of visual features consists of quantifiable
attributes from 20 façades. The survey methodology
applied in this study was based on a scaling system
where participants rated each visual feature on
a scale from 0 to 2. The accuracy of the indicators
could be evaluated by their standard deviation,
as seen in Figure 3, where the top 3 and lowest 3
façades in terms of pleasantness are shown.
The words provided by participants without any preimposed
vocabulary resemble terminology found
in several studies presented in the literature review
(ISO 12913-3; Axelsson, 2007; Medeiros et al., 2023).
4.2. Survey of visual features and
perceptual attributes
The second survey of this research was carried out
with another group of twelve (n=12) participants and
was composed of two stages:
First, participants were shown the sequence of 20
façade pictures and had to fill-in a spreadsheet with
24 physical visual features with a scaling system of
0-2, being 0 the lack of that feature, 1 being some
presence, and 2 being a dominant feature. The final
list of visual features included: number of floors,
presence of a basement or attic, degree of symmetry,
balconies, decoration, maintenance conditions, and
materials: painted plaster, concrete finish, brick,
wood, glass, metal, stone, façade greenery, and
color tones including white, grey, black, brown, red,
orange, yellow, green, blue, and purple.
After completing the survey of visual features,
they proceeded with the visual perception survey.
They were shown the sequence of houses again,
but they were asked to rate perceptual attributes
with bipolar scales of -3 to 3, 0 being neutral. The
inclusion of these specific perceptual attributes
for the survey was guided by the criteria of having
terms that are both grounded in literature and
reflect the terms that the first group provided in
the attribute-generation survey. The subjective
perceptual dimensions, presented as bipolar
rating scales, included: Unpleasant–Pleasant,
Ugly–Beautiful, Cold–Warm, Monotonous–Vibrant,
Minimalist–Excessive, Dirty–Clean, Shy–Expressive,
Figure 3. Boxplots of visual features.
28 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
The resulting median values for each façade are
shown in the heatmap in Figure 5, with the dark blue
being the absence of that visual feature, pink being
some presence of that feature, and yellow being a
dominant feature.
4.2.2. Perceptual attributes
In the second part of the survey, participants
evaluated the façades using a set of perceptual
descriptors organized as bipolar scales, ranging
from -3 to +3, with 0 representing a neutral or
balanced. Most perceptual descriptors showed
good usability and meaningful distinctions across
buildings. However, the variability (figure 4) in some
dimensions suggests that further refinement could
improve consistency.
Figure 6 shows a heatmap revealing the median
value for 23 perceptual scales in each façade. The
first on the left is pleasantness, being the reference
to selecting the top 3 and lowest 3 preferred façades.
Figure 4. Boxplots of visual perception.
Figure 6. Heatmap of perceptual attributes for 20
buildings.
A cross section of the heatmap along the unpleasant
– pleasant axis is shown in Figure 7. Buildings 7,
18, and 20 received the highest overall score in
pleasantness, followed by Buildings 5, 4, 11, and 20.
The lowest ranking buildings in the pleasantness
scale were Buildings 2, 3, 8, 10, and 17.
The pleasantness scale revealed general proximity
to other attributes on the positive side of the
perceptual spectrum, including beauty, cleanness,
safety, and warmth.
Figure 5. Heatmap of visual features for 20
buildings.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
29
5. Conclusions and Discussion
Figure 7. Median Unpleasant – Pleasant values for
20 façades.
A particularly notable finding is that the façades
ranked lowest in pleasantness (Buildings 2, 3, 8, 10,
and 17) also exhibited the lowest scores in perceptual
cleanness, and in objective maintenance condition
and the most pleasant façades (Buildings 7, 18, and
20) scored highly in condition and cleanness (figure
8).
This study explored a methodology for assessing
façade visual features and visual perception. A
literature review was conducted to identify key
studies related to visual quality assessment. Then,
a preliminary survey was conducted to identify
perceptual attributes that participants used to
describe the façades. Next, a two-part survey was
conducted, providing participants with a list of
indicators for visual features and another list of
perceptual descriptors. The results of the survey
show a generally consistent methodology with
some observations. The relation between objective
indicators and perceptual attributes is clear with
some parameters such as pleasantness and
cleanness, decoration, and vegetation.
The study provides initial insights into the
relationship between visual features and perception,
however, it does not model these relationships
statistically. Future research could expand amount
of participants and houses in the experiment for
further analysis such as dimensionality reduction
techniques like Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
and organize façade visual perception attributes into
a more interpretable model.
6. Acknowledgements
Figure 8. Median values of condition with a 0-2
scale, and cleanness with a -3 to 3 scale for 20
façades.
4.2.3. Effectiveness of the methodology
Many of the indicators and descriptors within the
framework seem to provide a reliable performance
suggesting they can be reused in future surveys
with similar objectives. The 0-2 scaling system
offers a low-threshold, intuitive approach while still
producing quantifiable data suitable for analysis.
The 3-3 provides more granularity and a bipolar
character which suits perceptual scales, but it could
be unstable when evaluating from an objective
approach. The selection of indicators for visual
features, and terms for the affective response survey
had an exploratory nature, and provided an overview
of their performance, being mostly accurate as the
values form the heatmaps can be easily identified in
the pictures. Some variability in the color selection
was notable, and a few scales that seemed less clear,
such as confusing-understandable, closed-open,
opaque-transparent, and hidden-exposed.
The limitations in the study include a low sample
size (n=22 and n=12) which compromises the
generalizability of the findings. All participants were
trained professionals and residents of Detmold.
These two factors could be taken as variables in
future studies (non-residents and non-professionals
in the construction industry).
The author extends sincere gratitude to BridgeRoot
Lda. (bridgeroot.uk) for their support during the
post-production of the photographs. Special thanks
to all participants who generously volunteered their
time and shared their insights. Additionally, special
thanks to the Human-Centered Façades team of TU
Delft for their insightful feedback in the early stages
of the study.
7. References
Axelsson O. Towards a psychology of photography:
dimensions underlying aesthetic appeal of photographs.
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Oct;105(2):411-34. doi: 10.2466/
pms.105.2.411-434. PMID: 18065064.
Bahar, F., Santosa, H., and Ernawati, J. (2022) Visual Quality
of the Facade of Cultural Heritage Buildings in the Historic
Area of Jalan Semeru Malang City. Budapest International
Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal)
Volume 5. e-ISSN: 2615-3076 (Online), p-ISSN: 2615-1715
(Print)
Bourassa, SC. (1988), Toward a theory of landscape
aesthetics, Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume
15, Issues 3–4, 1988, ISSN 0169-2046, https://doi.
org/10.1016/0169-2046(88)90048-5.
Böhme, G. (2000), Acoustic Atmospheres; a Contribution
to the Study of Ecological Aesthetics. Journal of Acoustic
Ecology, Volume 1, Number 1, Spring 2000 https://
pdfcoffee.com/soundscape-the-journal-of-acousticecology-pdf-free.html
Botteldooren, D., De Coensel, B., Aletta, F., Kang, J. (2023).
Triangulation as a Tool in Soundscape Research. In:
30 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Fiebig, A., Sisneros, J.A., Popper, A.N.,
Fay, R.R. (eds) Soundscapes: Humans and Their Acoustic
Environment. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research,
vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-
22779-0_8
Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1987). Context effects in
perceived environmental quality assessment: Scene
selection and landscape quality ratings. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 7(3), 233–250. https://doi.
org/10.1016/S0272-
Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape
quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and
Urban Planning, 54(1-4), 267–281
Daniel, Terry C.; Boster, Ron S. 1976. Measuring landscape
esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. Res. Pap.
RM-RP-167. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Range and Experiment Station. 66 p.
de la Fuente de Val, G., Atauri, JA., de Lucio, JV. (2006),
Relationship between landscape visual attributes and
spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterraneanclimate
landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning,
Volume 77, Issue 4, ISSN 0169-2046, https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003.
Gobster, P., Ribe, RJ., Palmer, JF. (2019), Themes and
trends in visual assessment research: Introduction to the
Landscape and Urban Planning special collection on the
visual assessment of landscapes, Landscape and Urban
Planning, Volume 191, 103635, ISSN 0169-2046, https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103635
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature:
A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Klein, Tillmann. (2013). Integral Façade Construction -
Towards a new product architecture for curtain walls.
Architecture and the Built Environment #03 https://books.
bk.tudelft.nl/press/catalog/book/44
Knaack, U., Klein, T., Bilow, M., Auer, T. (2007). Façades:
Principles of Construction. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8281-0
Lee, T. and Ng, E. (2024), Environ. Res.: Infrastruct. Sustain.
4 032001, DOI: 10.1088/2634-4505/ad78fc
Llorca-Bofí, J., Dreier, C., Heck, J., & Vorländer, M. (2022).
Urban Sound Auralization and Visualization Framework—
Case Study at IHTApark. Sustainability, 14(4), 2026. https://
doi.org/10.3390/su14042026
Lothian, A. (1999) Landscape and the Philosophy of
Aesthetics: Is Landscape Duality Inherent in the Landscape
or in the Eye of Beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning,
44, 177-198.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
Lovell, J. Building Envelopes: an Integrated Strategy,
Princeton Architectural Press, 2010.
Martinez-Alcaraz, P., de la Barra, P., Andriotis, C.P., Wang,
Y., Luna-Navarro, A. (2025). Personalised Building Controls
Based on Individual Thermal Preferences for Energy
Efficiency and Thermal Comfort. In: Berardi, U. (eds)
Multiphysics and Multiscale Building Physics. IABP 2024.
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 555. Springer,
Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8317-5_31
Medeiros, A., Fernandes, C., Gonçalves, JF., Farinha-
Marques, P. (2023), Optimising a landscape visual
quality protocol. A Method for reducing respondent
fatigue and obtaining site-specific indicators, MethodsX,
Volume 11, ISSN 2215-0161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
mex.2023.102455.
Palmer, P. J. (1997). Teaching & Learning in
Community. About Campus, 2(5), 4-13. https://doi.
org/10.1177/108648229700200503 (Original work
published 1997)
Palmer, J.F. and Hoffman, R.E. (2001) Rating Reliability and
Representation Validity in Scenic Landscape Assessments.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 149-161. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00133-5
Polat, AT, (2015) visual quality assessment in landscape
architecture. 19th International Academic Conference,
Florence ISBN Preliminary version, IISES
Prieto, A., & Oldenhave, M. (2021). What makes a façade
beautiful? Architects’ perspectives on the main aspects
that inform aesthetic preferences in façade design. Journal
of Facade Design and Engineering, 9(2), 21–46. https://doi.
org/10.7480/jfde.2021.2.5540
Scott, A. (2002). Assessing Public Perception of Landscape:
The LANDMAP experience. Landscape Research, 27(3),
271–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390220149520
Scruton, R. (1979). The aesthetics of architecture. Princeton
University Press. ISBN: 9780691158334 https://press.
princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691158334/theaesthetics-of-architecture?srsltid=AfmBOopGKwzjn7i890
CNWh4YPusLZezSejoNzqhdB602x98uwR-r8pPv
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2022). The Concept
of the Aesthetic. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/
aesthetic-concept/
Ulrich, RS. (1986), Human responses to vegetation and
landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume
13, ISSN 0169-2046, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-
2046(86)90005-8.
USDA, (1974). Special Collections, USDA National
Agricultural Library. Accessed May 2, 2025, https://www.
nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/show/1115
USDI, BLM (1980) Visual Simulation Techniques, US Gov
Print Off, Wash DC. https://www.scirp.org/reference/
referencespapers?referenceid=1879331
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
31
Article
Hidden Steel Structures in Modern Sacred Architecture: Integrating
Academic Opportunities with Research
Längsbinderkirchen und versteckte Stahlkonstruktionen im Sakralbau der Hochmoderne. Grundlagenforschung zur Erfassung und zu denkmalpflegerischen Strategien.“
(DFG-Projectniumber: 525823438 - URL: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/525823438)
Najmeh Najafpour 1 , Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uta Pottgiesser 1,2
1. Detmold School of Design, TH OWL, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany
2. Heritage & Architecture, Department of Architectural Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, Julianalaan,
134, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
Abstract
This article reflects on modern sacred architecture that is investigated in the DFG research project dealing with
longitudinal hidden steel truss structures and their architectural, structural, and conservation challenges1.
Constructed during the inter-war, as well as in the post-war period, in German-speaking countries this innovative
way of construction facilitated large spans and column-free interiors. The project is structured into three
phases: The first phase, ‘Recording and Classification’, involves archival research, field surveys, and structural
documentation to establish a comprehensive database. The second phase, ‘Recognition and Evaluation’,
assesses architectural relevance, structural integrity, and monument conservation value, leading to the
development of standardized heritage assessment criteria. The third phase, ‘Preservation and Development’,
formulates conservation strategies and adaptive reuse proposals, ensuring these structures remain both
culturally significant and functionally viable. However, the churches and their constructions have remained
largely undocumented. The motivation behind the research is three-folded: Firstly, lack of knowledge about
the construction methods. Secondly, lack of protection for some of the churches built with this innovation.
And finally, current pressure to convert some of them into new purposes. The churches share this fate with
many hidden steel structures that were also used for larger cultural and commercial buildings. The project
and this article want to bring these structures back to light and to the attention of experts and the public.
By integrating architectural history, civil engineering, and material science, the project and its linked student
works contributes to the broader discourse on “Cultural Heritage Construction (Kulturerbe Konstruktion)” and
is addressing both academic research and teaching, and practical conservation challenges.
Keywords: longitudinal truss churches, hidden steel structures, sacred architecture, monument conservation
and preservation, adaptive reuse conservation, adaptive reuse, sustainability in architecture
1. Introduction
The study of longitudinal hidden steel truss
structures in modern sacred architecture is an area
that has received limited scholarly attention despite
its architectural and technological significance.
Between 1928 and 1938, as well as in the post-war
period, numerous religious buildings, predominantly
Catholic but also Protestant, were constructed
in German-speaking countries utilizing steel as a
primary structural material (Fissabre et al., 2022).
A defining characteristic of these buildings is the
longitudinal truss, which creates large spans and
column-free interiors, allowing open and flexible
worship spaces. The steel skeletons were concealed
behind cladding or plaster, making this innovation
largely unnoticed.
Figure 1. Spanning a column-free basilica, the
rationale behind longitudinal truss structure
(Hegemann, 1929, pp. XII, 180).
32 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
This fact aligns with general engineered constructions
where structural components remain hidden
within different architectural forms, as examined
in contemporary studies on Hidden Structures in
Germany (Lorenz & Gielen, 2023).
Despite being sacred and thus the need to be
spiritual, churches also serve functional needs,
balancing functionality with spiritual meaning. A
space that is not just a physical structure, but also
a metaphor for the divine. A space that represents
both the earthly and eternal realms (Nollert et al.,
2011). Sacred architecture, therefore, is not just
defined by its religious function. Sacred spaces
are typically marked by thresholds or boundaries,
symbolizing the transition from the mundane to
the sacred. A physical and symbolic space where
the divine is present, and where individuals can
experience a connection to it (Büchse et al., 2012).
Like other countries Germany faced significant
changes in the architectural style and functions
in the interwar period which resulted in the birth
of modern construction typologies as well. In
the same manner, in the first decades of the 20th
century, modern sacred architecture underwent a
fundamental transformation, moving away from the
monumental designs of the Gothic Revival or Eclectic
Historicism towards simpler, more functional forms
(Pursell, 2003). The demand to rebuild the destroyed
churches of WWI and WWII further shaped a new
church architecture. Despite these advancements,
the period up to the WWII represents an initial phase
rather than a culmination of church architecture
(Weyres & Otto, 1959). The modern church of the
20th century intended to integrate into daily life
rather than standing apart (Nagel & Linke, 1968).
The integration of steel trusses in sacred architecture
was initially met with resistance from church
institutions and some construction authorities, who
viewed the industrial aesthetic as inappropriate for
these settings. Nonetheless, the use of steel enabled
new spatial configurations. Despite their innovative
construction, many of these churches remain underdocumented
in architectural history and with regard
to preservation efforts. Contemporary publications
often omitted references to the steel construction,
contributing to a lack of awareness regarding their
structural methodologies. The identification and
analysis of these structures are therefore crucial for
understanding their role in the evolution of modern
materials and constructions in modern sacred
architecture (Fissabre et al., 2022).
The research project is funded within the Priority
Program (SPP) “Cultural Heritage Construction” (SPP,
2024) by the German Research Foundation (DFG). It
is conducted in collaboration with multiple academic
partners from FH Aachen, TU Braunschweig, and
TH OWL, led by Prof. Dr.-Ing. Anke Fissabre (FH
Aachen), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Evelin Rottke (FH Aachen),
Prof. Dr. sc. techn. Klaus Thiele (TU Braunschweig),
and Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uta Pottgiesser (TH OWL), bringing
together expertise from different disciplines. This
research aims to systematically document and
analyse the architectural and structural principles
of these churches. By examining historical records,
architectural plans, and conducting structural
investigations and digital documentation, the
study seeks to clarify the technical and cultural
significance of these buildings. Additionally,
it explores the interplay between structural
engineering and ecclesiastical design, shedding light
on the contributions of architects and engineers in
shaping sacred spaces during the early and mid-20th
century. Another factor is the increasing pressure
of adaptive reuse due to deconsecration (Strack,
2024). Subsequently a thorough understanding of
their construction, is essential for informed heritage
conservation.
Figure 2. Construction process of the steel truss
structure of the St. Dreifaltigkeit church in Herne
in 1931 (Pfarrgemeinde St. Dreifaltigkeit Herne-
Holthausen, 1983, p. 35)
2. Methodology
The research employs a multidisciplinary
methodology and is structured into three
interrelated phases:
(1) Recording and Classification, which involves
comprehensive archival research and field surveys
to identify and document these structures;
(2) Recognition and Evaluation, where structural
and historical analyses are conducted to assess
the architectural and cultural significance of these
buildings, leading to the development of heritage
evaluation frameworks; and
(3) Preservation and Development, which formulates
conservation strategies and adaptive reuse
proposals to ensure the long-term sustainability of
these structures.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
33
collection process to systematically document and
analyse these buildings.
The final phase focuses on developing strategies for
the sustainable conservation and adaptive reuse of
these buildings. By analysing typical damage patterns
and structural vulnerabilities, targeted conservation
measures are proposed. These recommendations
include both preventive maintenance strategies and
active restoration techniques tailored to the unique
construction materials and methods used in these
churches.
Figure 3. Map of sacred building identified in the
region (DFG-Project, 2024).
The first phase of the study involves an extensive
documentation and classification of modern sacred
buildings which are supposed to be constructed
with longitudinal hidden steel truss structures.
Through systematic field surveys and architectural
investigations, key details regarding construction
techniques, material compositions, and spatial
configurations are documented. To achieve
precise documentation, advanced digital survey
methods such as 3D laser scanning, UAV-based
photogrammetry, and thermographic imaging
are utilized. Structural investigations focus on
determining the load-bearing capacity, material
degradation, and hidden connections that influence
the overall stability of these buildings. Additionally,
connections between these buildings and the
steel industry are explored to contextualize their
construction within broader economic and industrial
trends.
Potential interventions such as interior modifications,
structural reinforcements, and facade restorations
can be evaluated to ensure compatibility with both
historical authenticity and contemporary usage.
Addressing viable approaches for repurposing these
buildings in response to the needs of society and
local communities ensures that their historical and
architectural significance is preserved while allowing
for contemporary functionality.
Figure 5. Roof detail (Herkommer, 1931, p. 184).
3. Integrating Academic
Opportunities with the Research
Figure 4. Detail of wall composition (Herkommer,
1929, p. XXI).
In the second analytical phase the cultural,
architectural, and technological significance of the
identified buildings are critically assessed. A primary
goal is to establish standardized criteria for assessing
the heritage values and for developing a preservation
framework. to facilitate decision-making for
heritage authorities. A key aspect of this phase is a
comparative analysis, where the recorded structures
are assessed against similar steel-structured
buildings within sacred and secular architecture. The
project employs a structured and multi-layered data
University-led research plays a crucial role in
advancing the understanding of architectural
heritage and structural engineering. Within the
framework of the DFG research project, student
research and study projects can contribute to
this discourse by exploring structural analysis,
material performance, and conservation strategies.
These projects exemplify how academic teaching
and university-led research interconnect with
the ongoing research project, allowing students
to engage with the current investigations while
reinforcing the project’s overarching objectives. The
following sections provide an overview of five? theses
that stem from this collaborative research effort.
34 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
3.1. Fire and Corrosion Protection
Strategies in High-Modernist Steel
Churches
The master’s thesis (Heidelin, 2025) focuses on the
fire and corrosion protection measures applied to
steel-framed churches from the early 20th century.
The thesis examines historical fireproofing and anticorrosion
techniques, assessing their effectiveness
over time. Through case studies, including St.
Willibrord in Kleve-Kellen (1929) and Heilig-Geist
in Frankfurt-Riederwald, the thesis evaluates how
early steel churches addressed durability challenges
and what implications these methods hold for
contemporary conservation efforts. The research
contributes to the broader discussion on adaptive
reuse strategies, ensuring structural safety while
preserving the authenticity of high-modernist
sacred buildings.
3.2. Façade Renovation Strategies for
Modern Sacred Architecture
The master’s thesis (Najafpour, 2025) focuses on the
third phase “Maintaining and Developing” of the DGF
research project and extend it by focusing on façade
renovation strategies for churches constructed
between the 1920s and 1940s, emphasizing
energy efficiency improvements while respecting
architectural integrity. It explores thermal retrofitting
and the impact of façade modifications on structural
behaviour of the case study, St. Dreifaltigkeit church
in Herne. Additionally, the research integrates energy
simulation tools to propose renovation solutions that
balance historical conservation with contemporary
sustainability standards. Adaptive reuse scenarios
for historical buildings are further studied to present
a compatible solution for the case studies. Finally,
presenting a comprehensive conclusion to address
various aspects influential in the final outcome.
Figure 6. CO2 reduction of façade renovation
(Najafpour, 2025).
3.3. Investigation of the Potential of
the Geo-Radar Method in Building
Diagnostics
The master‘s thesis (Koch, 2024) examines the
potential of the geo-radar method in building
diagnostics using the example of the church ‘Zu den
heiligen Schutzengeln’ in Schaffhausen, a so-called
‘steel church’ from the interwar period. The aim is
to evaluate the suitability of geo-radar, partly in
combination with endoscopy, for the non-destructive
localization of the installed steel construction
elements in the masonry. To this end, laboratory
tests are carried out, the results of which are
compared with field data and compared with existing
data sets from earlier building investigations. At the
same time, a historical classification of the church
is carried out on the basis of archival research. The
work contributes to the further development of lowdestruction
investigation methods and evaluates
their significance for analysing historical sacred
buildings in accordance with the requirements of
listed buildings.
3.4. Structural Analysis of the St.
Dreifaltigkeit church in Herne-
Holthausen
The master’s thesis (Ringel, 2025) investigates
the structural composition and analysis of the
St. Dreifaltigkeitskirche in Herne-Holthausen, a
longitudinal truss church built in 1931. Given the
economic constraints of the interwar period, steel
emerged as a viable material, enabling large sans
with high load-bearing capacity. However, due
to its industrial connotation, steel structures in
ecclesiastical architecture were often concealed
behind mineral-based cladding. This thesis aims
to identify hidden steel elements, assess their
structural integrity, and reconstruct the original
load-bearing system through on-site measurements
and archival research. By documenting the historical
construction methods and analyzing material
properties, the study enhances the understanding
of structural vulnerabilities and conservation needs
for similar steel-frame churches.
3.5. Transformation and Adaptive
Reuse of the St. Dreifaltigkeit Church
in Herne
A forthcoming master‘s thesis will focus on the
adaptive reuse of the St. Dreifaltigkeit Church
in Herne, exploring strategies for repurposing
the space while maintaining its architectural and
cultural significance. The research will examine
functional transformation possibilities, addressing
the challenges of integrating new uses within a
historically and structurally significant sacred
building. Through case study analysis and design
proposals, the thesis aims to contribute to the
discourse on sustainable preservation and adaptive
reuse of modernist churches.
Together, these researches illustrate how
university-based academic researches foster
student engagement in heritage conservation and
structural engineering research, reinforcing the
role of interdisciplinary collaboration within the
research framework. The integration of such largescale
research projects into academic curricula
and university coursework not only enhances
students‘ understanding of complex architectural
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
35
and structural challenges but also encourages
active participation in ongoing scientific inquiries. By
exposing students to real-world heritage conservation
and engineering methodologies, this approach
bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge
and applied research, creating a deeper academic
and professional commitment. Strengthening these
connections between funded research, university
education, and student involvement ensures that
future scholars are well-equipped to continue
investigations in architectural heritage, material
science, and structural preservation, ultimately
contributing to the advancement of modern
conservation strategies.
4. Results
4.1. Raising Awareness
A significant aspect of this research should be its
contribution to the global architectural heritage
conversation. By integrating the findings into
the collection of DOCOMOMO International, the
project will ensure that this knowledge will reach
an international audience. This allows scholars,
conservationists, and policymakers to access critical
insights into hidden steel construction in modern
sacred buildings, enabling comparative research and
collaborative heritage initiatives.
A key contribution of the study the envisioned openaccess
repository could foster ongoing international
collaboration. The repository serves as an
educational resource, allowing future researchers,
conservationists, and architects to build upon the
documented findings, and ideally add and extend
specific knowledge in the future, also allowing for
widespread dissemination and further research
opportunities.
4.2. Historical Analyses and
Conservation
Beyond architectural innovations, this research
may serve as a stepping stone in examining the
industrial and economic factors that influenced the
adoption of steel structures in sacred architecture.
The connections between architects, steel
manufacturers, and civil engineers could be further
explored to provide insights into the collaborative
efforts that facilitated these constructions. Similar
structural developments were documented in
Berlin, where innovative engineering solutions
influenced modernist constructions, including
sacred architecture (Staroste, May & Lorenz, 2020).
A significant aspect of this research is the insight into
the adaptation of industrial construction techniques
into sacred architecture, revealing how methods
traditionally employed in non-secular construction
influenced church design. Through structural
modelling and material analysis, the study explores
the extent to which early prefabrication and serial
production techniques may have played a role in
these buildings, if applicable, particularly in optimizing
construction efficiency and material usage. These
findings contribute to a broader understanding
of how architecture of the modern movement
integrated industrial advancements into nonindustrial
buildings and religious spaces, ultimately
shaping new forms of sacred environments.
Additionally, archival studies may shed light on lesserknown
pioneers and early experiments with these
techniques, contributing to a deeper understanding
of their development. This contextualization
is essential for uncovering the economic and
technological motivations behind the integration of
steel-based construction in religious architecture.
Furthermore, this research contributes to a
monument conservation assessment of these
buildings, which will further contribute to a broader
policy framework for historic preservation of hidden
steel constructions.
5. Limitations
Figure 7. Screenshot of Docomomo.Architectuul
(Architectuul, n.d.)
The project faces several challenges that impact
data collection, structural analysis, and conservation
planning. A primary limitation is the incomplete
historical documentation of these churches,
as many archival records lack details on their
structural composition, material specifications, or
modifications over time. This absence of systematic
archival data complicates is making it difficult to
verify their original construction methods, material
properties, and structural behaviour. Additionally,
this gap in documentation presents challenges
for non-destructive testing methods, which rely
on prior knowledge of material configurations
and often produce inconclusive results when key
historical details are missing. The necessity of cross-
36 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
referencing fragmented historical sources and
waiting for responses from monument authorities
and archival institutions further extends the
research timeline, requiring continuous validation
and iterative reassessment.
Another significant limitation is the disparity in
research timelines and data availability. The phased
nature of the project means that researchers working
on specific aspects—such as student theses—
often rely on incomplete data, leading to necessary
assumptions that may later prove inaccurate
once additional archival or structural information
becomes available. The delayed accessibility of
critical data means that certain analyses may need
to be revisited after findings from other parts of
the research emerge. This workflow can affect the
coherence of findings in earlier research stages,
requiring constant revision and integration of newly
acquired information. As the project progresses,
refining data-sharing mechanisms and synchronizing
research efforts will be crucial to mitigating these
limitations and ensuring greater accuracy and
consistency across all phases.
A critical factor that will impact the project is the
practical implementation of conservation and
adaptive reuse strategies in later phases. While the
research itself focuses on documenting, analysing,
and proposing solutions, the actual execution of
interventions in real-world scenarios will encounter
external constraints that extend beyond the
research framework. The preservation and potential
repurposing of these churches depend not only on
their structural and material characteristics but also
on regulatory, social, and cultural considerations that
influence decision-making. These factors shape the
feasibility and scope of adaptive reuse, introducing
additional challenges that must be accounted for in
the final conservation strategies.
A major challenge is the strong cultural and emotional
attachment that communities have to sacred
buildings. These structures are deeply connected
to collective memory, social identity, and cultural
heritage, making any intervention—particularly
adaptive reuse—a sensitive and complex process. In
the third phase, which focuses on maintenance and
development, these considerations pose significant
challenges, as adaptive reuse strategies must
carefully balance modern functionality with historical
and cultural significance. The integration of new uses
into these spaces requires thorough community
engagement and contextual analysis to ensure that
transformations align with societal expectations and
heritage values, not to mention financial feasibility.
Additionally, many of these churches are listed
buildings, subject to strict heritage regulations
that impose constraints on modifications and
interventions. The challenge lies in finding feasible
solutions that respect conservation guidelines
while enabling these structures to remain usable
and relevant in contemporary settings. Historically
significant buildings with architectural and cultural
value often require a delicate negotiation between
preserving authenticity and accommodating new
functions, ensuring that adaptive reuse does not
compromise their historical integrity. The third phase
of the project will need to address these challenges
by developing carefully considered strategies that
reconcile heritage conservation principles with the
evolving needs of society and urban development.
6. Conclusions
The complexity of the subject, combined with the
limited availability of historical records, makes
progress gradual, requiring extensive archival
inquiries, field surveys, and technical verifications.
Since multiple academic institutions are working
collaboratively, the project benefits from an
interdisciplinary approach, yet it also requires careful
coordination to synthesize findings across different
research strands. The time-consuming nature
of data validation, particularly regarding church
records, structural assessments, and material
properties, highlights the necessity of continuous
refinement of methodologies and adaptation to
emerging challenges.
Despite these challenges, the project lays the
groundwork for an understanding of these structures
and buildings associated and also provides
the base for future research and conservation
efforts, establishing a systematic framework for
documenting, assessing, and preserving these
underrepresented sacred structures. While
many aspects remain under investigation, the
ongoing inquiries will ultimately provide a more
comprehensive understanding of these structures,
ensuring that they receive the recognition and
preservation strategies they require within heritage
and conservation discourse.
7. References
Architectuul. (n.d.). Architecture In Danger. Architectuul.
https://architectuul.com/digest/architecture-in-danger
Büchse, A., Fendrich, H., Reichling, P., & Zahner, W.
(Eds.). (2012). Kirchen - Nutzung und Umnutzung:
Kulturgeschichtliche, theologische und praktische
Reflexionen. Aschendorff.
DFG-Project (2024). Längsbinderkirchen und versteckte
Stahlkonstruktionen im Sakralbau der Hochmoderne.
[Unpublished project documentation]. FH Aachen, TU
Braunschweig, TH OWL.
GEPRIS (2024). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
– Projektnummer 525823438. Detailseite Projekt. https://
gepris.dfg.de/gepris/t/525823438?context=projekt&task=
showDetail&id=525823438&
Hegemann, W. (1929). Hans Herkommers neue Kirchen.
Wasmuths Monatshefte für Baukunst und Städtebau, 13,
175-183.
Heidelin, L. (2024). Stahlkirchen der Hochmoderne –
Eine Konstruktionsanalyse zu Strategien des Brand- und
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
37
Korrosionsschutzes an Stahlhochbauten der ersten
Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts. Technische Universität
Braunschweig, Institut für Bauwerkserhaltung und
Tragwerk.
Herkommer, H. (1931). Katholische Kirchen in Ratingen und
Schneidmühl. Zentralblatt der Bauverwaltung, 51(12), 181-
186.
Koch, M. (2024). Untersuchung zu Potentialen der
Georadarmethode in der Bauwerksdiagnostik –
Ermittlungen am Fallbeispiel der Kirche „Zu den heiligen
Schutzengeln“ in Schaffhausen [Master’s thesis, Technische
Universität Braunschweig].
Lorenz, W., & Gielen, M., with 3D IT. (2023). Hidden
structures: The art of engineering. Retrieved from https://
hidden-structures.info/en/map/
Nagel, S., & Linke, S. (Eds.). (1968). Kirchliches Bauen.
Najafpour, N. (2025). Energy efficiency and environmental
impact in façade renovation strategies for modern
sacred architecture: An application on Dreifaltigkeit
Church in Herne [Master’s thesis, Technische Hochschule
Ostwestfalen-Lippe].
Nollert, A., Volkenandt, M., Gollan, R.-M., & Frick, E. (Eds.).
(2011). Kirchenbauten in der Gegenwart: Architektur
zwischen Sakralität und sozialer Wirklichkeit. Pustet, F.
Pfarrgemeinde St. Dreifaltigkeit Herne-Holthausen. (1983).
Festschrift der Pfarrgemeinde St. Dreifaltigkeit Herne-
Holthausen anlässlich des 75-jährigen Bestehens der
Pfarrgemeinde. Pfarrgemeinde St. Dreifaltigkeit.
Pursell, T. (2003). “The Burial of the Future”: Modernist
architecture and the cremationist movement in Wilhelmine
Germany. Mortality, 8, 233–2504. https://doi.org/10.1080/1
3576270310001599795
Ringel, F. (2025). St. Dreifaltigkeits-Kirche in Herne-
Holthausen – Untersuchung und Analyse des Tragwerks
einer Längsbinderkirche in Stahlskelettbauweise von
1931. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für
Bauwerkserhaltung und Tragwerk.
SPP 2024 Schwerpunktprogramm „Kutlurerbe
Konstruktion“,
https://kulturerbe-konstruktion.
de/?lang=en
Staroste, H., May, R. & Lorenz, W. with the participation
of Ines Prokop (2020). Ingenieurbauführer Berlin. Michael
Imhof Verlag Petersberg.
Strack, C. (2024). Germany: Catholic churches are
demolished or repurposed. Dw.Com.
Weyres, W., & Otto, B. (1959). Kirchen. Handbuch fuer den
Kirchenbau. Verlag Georg D. W. Callwey Muenchen.
38 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Circular Facade Design: The Importance of end of life scenarios to
reduce environmental Impact
Article
Abdelrahman Badr 1
Supervisors: Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Daniel Arztmann 1 , Dipl.-Ing. Florian Starz², MSc Carmen Herrmann²
1. Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany
2. Werner Sobek AG, Albstraße 14, 70597 Stuttgart, Germany
Abstract
This study explores the transition from a linear to a circular economy in the building and construction industry,
focusing on the environmental impacts of façade systems in office buildings. The linear „Take-Make-Dispose“
model contributes significantly to resource consumption, waste generation, and CO2 emissions, with the
construction sector responsible for 35% of global waste. The EU‘s Circular Economy Action Plan emphasizes
designing products to minimize waste and retain resources, highlighting the importance of end-of-life (EoL)
considerations in construction. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is employed to evaluate the environmental impacts
of design decisions, particularly for stick curtain wall systems, which are widely used in office buildings. The
research adopts a mixed methodology, combining literature review and design process analysis, focusing
on frame materials (aluminum, steel, wood) and glass options. Three EoL scenarios—reuse, recycling, and
demolition—are assessed to determine their impact on embodied carbon. The study is limited to office buildings
in Germany, with a case study in Stuttgart, due to the prevalence of stick systems in such structures. Preliminary
findings indicate that reuse scenarios generally have the lowest environmental impact, though outcomes vary
based on material combinations. By systematically analyzing EoL scenarios, this research provides a framework
for optimizing façade designs to enhance sustainability, reduce waste, and promote circularity in real-world
construction projects.
Keywords: circularity, end of life scenarios, embodied carbon, stick systems
1. Introduction
For years, products were developed in a linear
economy characterized by a „Take-Make-Dispose“
approach, contributing to the so-called „Throwaway
Society.“ This system has significantly impacted
the environment, with 50% of global greenhouse
gas emissions resulting from the extraction and
processing of natural resources. Despite the 2015
Paris Agreement, where 195 countries committed
to limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C,
recent research indicates that current efforts are
insufficient, with projections suggesting warming
of 2.5-2.9°C unless emissions fall by 28%-42% by
2030 (“Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record,”
2023). A key strategy to achieve this is transitioning
from a linear to a circular economy, which promotes
material reuse and closed-loop systems to maximize
resource efficiency. Circular economy modeling has
demonstrated a potential 50% reduction in natural
resource consumption by 2050 compared to 2018,
with CO2e emissions from the built environment
expected to decrease by 38% by 2050 and up to
56% beyond that (Stahel and MacArthur, 2019).
The End-of-Life (EoL) phase plays a crucial role in
this transition by reducing energy consumption
and minimizing environmental impacts (“Circular
Economy Action Plan - European Commission,”
2020). This thesis focuses on EoL scenarios in
façade design, particularly addressing stick systems,
to promote material reuse and recycling over
demolition. By integrating circular strategies early
in the design process, architects can contribute
to a more sustainable built environment. Reusing
building materials alone has the potential to cut CO2e
emissions by 0.3 billion tons annually, significantly
reducing reliance on new primary materials while
fostering climate-conscious construction practices.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
39
1.2. Scope and Research Question
Figure 1. Scope, objective and research question.
1.1. Problem Statement
The built environment which accounts for
approximately 42% of carbon emissions where vast
number of raw materials is produced, and a lot of
waste is generated. Reflecting this in Germany,
60% of waste comes from the construction and
demolition industry (including road construction)
(Ministry,2020). So, shifting to circularity is important
as it allows materials to be in continuous use of
resources through recycling and reusing. To achieve
that the end-of-life phase needs to be considered
as it forms the link between the linear economy
and the circular economy. Focusing on the End-of-
Life (eol) phase, evaluative design aids like Life Cycle
Assessment (LCA) provide metrics and methods
to assess the environmental impacts of different
design choices. However, previous research has
shown that lcas, particularly those applied to
façades, often oversimplify eol scenarios. This is
typically due to the assumption of a predominant
landfill scenario, neglecting alternative possibilities
such as reuse or recycling. While lcas aim to evaluate
the environmental impacts of buildings across their
entire life cycle, the eol phase is often not given
sufficient attention. These gaps in information and
oversimplifications during the lca process are critical
to address, as they directly impact the ability of
planners to make informed decisions in the design
phase. A more comprehensive understanding of
material properties, production processes, and endof-life
scenarios is essential to ensure that design
choices align with sustainability goals and minimize
environmental impacts. Incorporating different eol
considerations at the planning phase is a key Factor
promoting circularity. As systems are considered
during the planning phase on how they would
be treated at the end of life of the building phase.
Designers can contribute to this flow of materials
and minimize waste.
This Thesis “Circular Façade design” will evaluate
stick curtain wall systems considering various
end of life scenarios. The research focuses on the
different materiality of the frame (mullion, transom)
and the insulated glazing built up through a life cycle
assessment approach. Other Façade components
such as cover cap, brackets and Aluminum sheet are
also considered. While insulation and gaskets are
considered but having only one scenario at the end
of life. This research will be limited to office buildings
as a type of building that is widely used in Germany.
As the extensive use of stick systems in office
buildings, with their large, glazed surfaces, presents
an opportunity to explore more sustainable façade
solutions. So, the Research through design will be
done to compare the designs of an office building
designed in Stuttgart Germany.Additionally, the
developed designs align with the with the clear
regulation parameters given to the installation
of glass elements in areas where there is a risk of
falling. This area varies but the case study will focus
on Category A and Category C2 according to the
German, the DIN 18008, part 4.
2. Literature Review
The research project follows a mixed methodology
which consists of two parts literature review and
research through design. The literature review will
gain insights about circularity, life cycle assessment
highlighting the end of life in each topic and stick
curtain wall systems focusing on the rethinking the
materiality of the profiles and glass as those are the
main variables for the design phase.
2.1. Circularity
Figure 2. Topics Reviewed.
The construction sector is a major contributor to
waste and emissions, with Germany generating
209 million tons of construction and demolition
waste annually, making up 52% of the country‘s
total waste. Embodied carbon, is mainly through
material extraction, manufacturing, transportation,
and disposal, it is particularly concerning as it cannot
be reduced over time like operational carbon. Key
materials such as cement, iron, steel, and aluminum
contribute 15% to global emissions, while building
40
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
façades alone account for up to 16% of a structure’s
embodied carbon (“Why the Built Environment –
Architecture 2030,” n.d.). To mitigate this impact,
circular economy strategies focus on reducing carbonintensive
materials and optimizing façade profile
selection and glass composition. Material choices,
including thickness and type of glass, significantly
affect CO2 emissions. Additionally, end-of-life (EOL)
strategies—remanufacturing, reuse, and recycling—
are essential for minimizing environmental impact.
Studies show that EOL decisions in construction are
driven by environmental benefits (60%), economic
costs (27%), technical feasibility (9%), and social
considerations (4%) (Berg, Hulsbeek, and Voordijk,
2023).
2.2. Life Cycle Assessment
The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) process was first
reviewed, covering key aspects from defining the
goal and scope to exploring Environmental Product
Declarations (EPDs) and essential LCA terms. A
particular focus was placed on the end-of-life (EOL)
stage within the LCA framework, examining where
and how it occurs in construction. Assessing the
EOL phase is crucial for sustainable practices, as
circular economy policies emphasize regeneration,
refurbishment, and material reuse. According to EN
15978, this phase is classified as ‚Module C,‘ beginning
with demolition or deconstruction, where materials
are either recovered for reuse or disposed of as
waste. Fig. 3 illustrates a circular design approach that
considers reuse at both the building and component
levels. Decisions made in Module C can lead to either
disposal or, when applying circular strategies under
Module D, contribute to future material cycles while
reducing environmental emissions (Ciroth & Hamed,
2024). LCA methodologies vary due to differences in
functional units, system boundaries, data collection,
and assumptions, complicating environmental
impact assessments. Additionally, uncertainty in
EOL data presents challenges, as assumptions must
be made about future material treatment methods,
recycling efficiencies, and transportation distances.
Figure 3. Circular LCA model design, (De Wolf,
Hoxha, and Fivet 2020).
Improved EOL modeling in LCA can enhance waste
management strategies and sustainable construction
practices. To address these complexities, relevant
studies were reviewed to establish effective
approaches. The article „Life Cycle Assessment of
Curtain Wall Facades: A Screening Study on End-of-
Life Scenarios“ (Cheong et al., 2024) examines the
environmental impact of different EOL strategies
for curtain wall façades. Using LCA methodology,
it compares recycling, reuse, and landfill scenarios
for aluminum profiles, glass panels, and other
façade components. The case study adopts the
assumptions from this study to ensure consistency
in evaluating EOL scenarios, including recycling
efficiencies and material treatment processes. Global
warming potential (GWP) and other environmental
indicators were used to assess impacts. The findings
highlight that material reuse significantly reduces
embodied carbon compared to recycling or disposal.
Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance
of component lifespan and design for disassembly in
making reuse strategies more feasible and effective.
2.3. Stick System Curtain wall
This part involves reviewing curtain wall, especially
stick systems. As it will be the system used in the
further in the case study. Later, focusing specifically
on the materially of the frame and the Glass as
they have a huge contribution in facades. (“Carbon
Footprint of Façades: Significance of Glass”,2022).
The glass is often an important part of the carbon
footprint. For the curtain walls, mullions and
transoms also account for a very large share of the
carbon footprint. For this study different mullions
and transoms will be evaluated also different types of
glazing built up. Other components such as gaskets
polyamide, EPDM and insulation are considered in
the case study but aren’t part of the literature review.
For material profiles Aluminum can easily be recycled;
components often retain high quality post-use,
though reuse can be difficult without standardization
and maintained. For Steel like Aluminum with slightly
different as it is easily separated and recycled,
and closed-loop systems are achievable, retaining
strength and quality. While timber has a shorter
life expectancy and lower fire resistance compared
to metals, its overall sustainability is bolstered by
its renewability and ability to be downcycled. The
type of glass significantly influences its potential for
reuse and recycling. Table 1 outlines the processes
suitable for remanufacturing glass and the end-oflife
possibilities for different glass types. Annealed
(float) glass panes are well-suited for reuse, as they
can be cut and further processed. In contrast, softcoated
glass is typically recycled, while printed
(enamelled) glass has limited recycling options due
to its coloration. Thermally prestressed glass cannot
be cut or edge-processed but can be reused in
the same format as laminated or insulating glass.
Laminated glass is difficult to reassemble into
insulating glass units (IGUs) and is often recycled in
an open-loop process, where its cullet is classified
as Class B or Class C and downcycled into insulation
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
41
or aggregate for road paint. Additionally, glass with
a high post-consumer cullet content is generally
produced as mid-iron or normal float glass rather
than low-iron glass. This underscores the importance
of understanding glass types when evaluating reuse
and recycling opportunities in building projects
(“Reuse, Remanufacturing, Recycling: The Case of
Glass for Buildings,” n.d.)
Table 1 Glass types of comparison and end of life
possibilities, (“Reuse, Remanufacturing, Recycling:
The Case of Glass for Buildings” n.d.)z
3. Case Study-Façade of an Office
unit
3.1. Presentation of Case Study
The two proposed designs are Cat A and C2 design
where each module has a width of 1.35m and height
of 3.5m. Each module has an infill opaque panel of
0.6m and the glass height is 2.9 m The brackets are
assesned where the top point is movable and the
bottom point is Fixed. The main difference between
the two designs is that C2 design has an extra
transom at a height of 1 meter for safty. Separating
the upper glazing from the bottom glazing. Making
Cat C2 more heaiver in terms of weight. The key goal
is to see the impacts of different end of life scenarios
to the embodied carbon of different façade design.
Through comparison of different designs of curtain
wall using a life cycle assessment framework, the
two driven designs align with the Clear regulation
given to the installation of glass elements in areas
where there is a risk of falling. This area varies but
the following case study will focus on Category A
and Category C2 according to the German, the
DIN 18008, part 4. Also, the study assumes that C2
glazing is the same in the upper and lower pane
according to the code it is allowed. But in practical
use often laminated glass in used in the lower
pane. Nevertheless, three glass built up options are
designed having the same U-value and g-value of the
IGU. Only triple glazing units are considered in this
case study as double glazing is not used generally
built for office buildings in Germany. But the same
methodology can be applied using double glazing
but depending on the location where the façade is
planned the u-value and g-value shall be calculated
again. While for the Frame materiality three types
of materiality will be evaluated Aluminum as a base
design, Steel and wood.
3.2. Methodology
Figure 4. Category A and Category C2 proposed
facade design.
The building set up is done to give the first
introduction of the case study and to start
investigating the façade design in depth. The
location is in Stuttgart and the study considered a
unit which is neither first nor last floor. The Facade
Form Factor (FFF) is used to express the ratio of the
Facade Surface Area (FSA) to the gross internal floor
area (GIA). For the case study a form factor of 1 is
considered. While the Floor-to-Floor height is 3.5m
used as a reference for the design of the Façade and
is used in further calculations. And the wind load
considered is 1.3kn/m2 the study period of 60 years
is used as it is the common life service of Buildings.
Figure 5. Case Study methodology.
The methodology of the case study is a simple
comparison between the two façades. It is done
using different design parameters. The design
variables are Materiality of the frame and glass and
end of life scenarios. Then a calculation of embodied
carbon of each façade will be done which follows
the Life cycle framework. The calculation utilized
in this assessment follows the method of the
Centre for Window & Cladding Technology (CWCT)
standardized methodology for the embodied
carbon assessment of facades and cladding. The
calculation of each phase while considering phase
D represents the benefits of reusing and recycling.
42
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Then the results will be comparing first the end of
life scenarios Reuse, recycle and demolish to find the
difference between then concerning the emissions
and the second comparison is to determine which
Variants has the least embodied carbon and the
most embodied carbon. The Assessment focus on
highlighting the end of life and beyond end of life
so the assessment includes the following life cycle
modules:
• Product stage [A1 – A3]
• Construction process stage [A4]
• Replacement stage [B4]
• End of life [C2 – C4]
Then selecting systems that match the materials
being used. This study relied on Schüco products. The
first system, referred to as System A, is the Schüco
FWS 50 Si. In this system, the mullions and transoms
are made of aluminum, and the assembly type is a
stick system, where the façade is structurally selfsupported.
The profiles are highly thermally insulated
to enhance energy efficiency. System A serves as
the base design variant, as outlined in Table 2. The
next two systems are add-on constructions, where
a thermally insulated aluminum profile is added to
a steel or wood supporting structure. These are
configured as mullion-transom constructions for
multi-story façades. (“AOC,”n.d.).
Table 2. System Design
• Beyond the building life cycle [D]
• A5 and C1 are excluded from the study as they
are the installation and demolition. The scope of
this guidance is limited to embodied carbon and
therefore does not include operational carbon
modules B6 and B7. At the time of writing, it is
anticipated further guidance will support Designers
in the consideration of facades impact on the
operational carbon of the asset. The study indicator
used is the Global Warming Potential (GWP), which
quantifies the embodied carbon of the façade. GWP
measures the environmental impact of greenhouse
gas emissions over the study period. This study will
focus on evaluating the CO2-equivalents [kg CO2 eq.]
over the 60 years’ project study period. Where the
Variables and end of life assumptions are as following
where the first design Category A is calculated using
3 different materials Aluminium, Steel and Timber
where each material has 3 end of life scenarios. 27
design variant analysed.
Glass design plays a crucial role in this case study, as
the main differences lie in the glass build-up. Three
glass configurations are analyzed: two for Category
A and one for Category C2. All middle panes are float
glass, except for Option 1, which uses toughened
safety glass (TSG). To achieve the required low
U-values and g-values, coatings were applied on
the second and fifth surfaces, with a consistent
cavity thickness of 16 mm. The structural integrity
was assessed using Sommer Global, while weight
and relative U-value data were calculated with
Saint-Gobain‘s Calumen tool. In Category A, Option
1 features a floor-to-floor glazing system without a
supporting beam, requiring laminated safety glass
(LSG). Option 2 is another triple-glazing unit, where
the outer pane consists of laminated glass, and
the inner pane is toughened safety glass (TSG). For
Category C2, Option 3 is a triple-glazing unit with
TSG for both the inner and outer panes, assumed to
be used for both the upper and lower panes. While
this setup complies with regulations, laminated
glass is often preferred in practical applications for
additional safety.
Figure 6 design parameters of Materiality and
end of life scenarios.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
43
4. Results
Table 3. Glass Design
Followed by the end of life key assumptions in the
transportation stage (A4), aluminum and steel are
assumed to be transported from Schüco in Bielefeld
to Stuttgart, while the glass is sourced from Saint-
Gobain. An average truck trailer with a 27-ton
payload and a diesel consumption of 38 liters per
100 km is used for transportation. End-of-life (EoL)
scenarios extend the façade’s life cycle through a
modeling approach, where net credits from system
expansion are allocated in Module D. Unlike other
life cycle modules, Module D represents an abstract
accounting method for future life cycles, resulting
in negative impacts that may appear to reduce
the overall reported footprint. In this study, the
tested EoL scenarios for façades include landfilling,
recycling, and reuse. Most Environmental Product
Declarations (EPDs) for laminated and low-emissivity
glass assume a 100% landfill scenario at the EoL
stage. Wood glulam is typically incinerated as biobased
waste, often in waste-to-energy plants. The
disposal site is assumed to be 50 km away. In the
recycling scenario, the pressure plate is unscrewed to
remove the glazing, while the remaining components
are demolished. Steel and aluminum are assumed to
be fully transported to recycling facilities for closedloop
recycling. Timber frames have a higher reuse
potential, with 80% being salvageable, as they can
often be reused directly without further processing.
Aluminum reuse includes re-anodizing and recoating,
allowing it to be reused at a high percentage. Glass
reuse potential varies depending on its build-up, with
an estimated 10% going to landfill due to damage or
reduced performance. Meanwhile, gaskets, EPDM,
and insulation are landfilled as inorganic waste. After
identyfing the systems,glass options and the end
of life scenarios. The input of the case study was
calculating the weights for each façade folowed by
the evaluation of the embodided carbon (A-D) for the
glass and for the frame then combining the variants
to obtian the results.
Figure 7. Variant Combinations.
The Summary of the output done is as following.
The first Comparison illustrated the significant
role of reuse scenarios in minimizing GWP across
all profile materials. For aluminum, reuse reduces
GWP by 45% compared to demolition, while steel
demonstrates an 18% greater benefit in reuse over
recycling. Wood, consistently showing the lowest
GWP across all stages, significantly outperforms
aluminum and steel due to its inherent carbonsequestration
properties and reduced production
impacts. These findings highlight the environmental
advantages of prioritizing reuse, as it minimizes both
production and disposal emissions, delivering the
most substantial reductions in embodied carbon.
The second Comparison highlights the critical
impact of glass selection on overall GWP. Option
3 glazing, which excludes lamination, achieves
a production GWP (A1-A3) of 73 kg CO2-eq/m²,
substantially lower than Option 1‘s 118 kg CO2-eq/
m². This design change, combined with the use of
tempered safety glass, contributes to the overall
lower environmental impact in Category C2, even
when considering the higher façade weight. The
shift underscores the importance of selecting glass
designs with lower production impacts to achieve
sustainable results. Finally, the variant comparison
emphasized the compounded benefits of combining
low-impact glass options with reuse strategies for
frame materials. The reuse scenarios for Category
A and Category C2 consistently achieve lower GWP
in Module D, which demonstrates the potential
for material reuse to offset life-cycle emissions
significantly. In contrast, demolition scenarios lack
the avoided burdens, resulting in the highest GWP
impacts. The comparisons underline the necessity
of thoughtful material selection, sustainable glass
design, and effective end-of-life strategies to achieve
meaningful environmental gains in façade systems.
5. Discussion
The study‘s major findings highlight that while
wood has a lower embodied carbon footprint,
its reassembly process is more complex. An
unexpected result was that steel had fewer reuse
scenarios than aluminum, yet it performed better in
terms of environmental impact. Notably, the reuse
of both steel and wood led to negative emissions,
largely due to the selection of glass in Option 3,
which had a lower embodied carbon impact. For
the baseline scenario, the study assumed that all
end-of-life glass is recycled into aggregate. However,
alternative pathways offer a greater variety of glass
recovery options, which could influence the overall
environmental performance. Sharing insights on
different types of cullet could further enhance
understanding of glass recycling potential. One
possible optimization strategy involves using lowcarbon
glass, which is manufactured with renewable
energy and a high recycled content. Additionally,
incorporating low-carbon profile materials could
provide further benefits, offering a more sustainable
alternative to conventional systems.
44
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
6. Conclusions
Figure 8. Discussion output.
This thesis highlights the importance of considering
end-of-life (EoL) scenarios for façades during the early
design stage. It provides a systematic methodology
to assess the materials used in façades. To achieve a
circular EoL scenario, it is necessary to use materials
with potential for circularity. Additionally, a system
with a low global warming potential (GWP) for EoL
processing is better than one with high GWP. The
results showed that wood has the lowest embodied
carbon compared to aluminium and steel, with
reusing wood producing the smallest variation in
CO2 emissions. However, challenges in disassembly
and maintenance make recycling more practical
for wood, as 80% of it is recycled to woodchips.
Aluminium’s recycling and reuse show minimal
differences due to its closed-loop recycling process.
Steel offers greater environmental benefits for reuse,
with an 18% higher benefit than recycling, as it avoids
energy-intensive processes like melting. However,
technical challenges in recovering steel without
compromising its integrity remain a challenge. The
IGU built up affect the end-of-life scenarios. As
Reusing glass panes offers significant potential to
reduce embodied carbon, with the greatest benefits
achieved by minimizing additional processing, as
demonstrated by the comparison between glass
options. All 3 glass options highlight the advantage
of reducing emissions through reuse despite
uncertainties. it was shown that transportation
emissions within Germany are minimal compared
to the production of new glass panes, encouraging
reuse considerations. For recycling, closed-loop
recycling provides substantial environmental
savings compared to open-loop processes,
especially for glass. Expanding closed-loop recycling
practices in Germany could reduce CO2 emissions
by approximately 300 kg per tonne of glass recycled
back into float glass. The practical advice to consider
Module D is to understand the material flow and
any processing work required to prepare the reused
product (Secondary Product) for reuse. For example,
re-ionizing aluminium was considered to make it
ready for reuse. Similarly, reusing glass was done
separately, depending on the glass build-up. Reusing
laminated glass is different from reusing float glass
and toughened safety glass as each one has its own
processing process for reuse. While Module D is
still in development, the concept is straightforward:
it is the difference between input and output. This
study addressed the first systematic way to consider
Module D in façades and encourages its inclusion
in the life cycle assessments of façades because it
significantly affects the decision-making process.
This study underscores the critical importance of
integrating end-of-life considerations into the early
design stages of façades to promote sustainability
and reduce environmental impacts. By emphasizing
the use of materials, designers can achieve
substantial environmental benefits. The findings
highlight the necessity of prioritizing reuse over
recycling or demolition, as demonstrated by the
significant GWP savings across different materials.
Incorporating Module D into life cycle assessments of
façades provides a systematic approach to evaluate
EoL scenarios, facilitating informed decision-making.
Ultimately, adopting circular design principles is
essential for aligning with global sustainability goals
and fostering a more sustainable built environment.
7. References
Cheong, C. Y., Brambilla, A., Gasparri, E., Kuru, A., &
Sangiorgio, A. (2024). Life cycle assessment of curtain
wall facades: A screening study on end-of-life scenarios.
Journal of Building Engineering, 84, 108600. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108600
CWCT. (n.d.). How to calculate the embodied carbon of
facades: A methodology. Retrieved December 30, 2024,
from https://www.cwct.co.uk/pages/embodied-carbonmethodology-for-facades
Hartwell, R., Coult, G., & Overend, M. (2023). Mapping the
flat glass value-chain: A material flow analysis and energy
balance of UK production. Glass Structures & Engineering,
8(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00195-
9
Glass for Europe. (n.d.). Reuse, remanufacturing, recycling:
The case of glass for buildings. Retrieved January 9,
2025, from https://glassforeurope.com/wp-content/
uploads/2025/01/Finalpaper_Reuse_remanuf_recycling_
v2.pdf
Arup. (n.d.). Carbon footprint of façades: Significance
of glass. Retrieved December 28, 2024, from https://
www.arup.com/insights/carbon-footprint-of-facadessignificance-of-glass
Rota, A., Zaccaria, M., & Fiorito, F. (2023). Towards a quality
protocol for enabling the reuse of post-consumer flat glass.
Glass Structures & Engineering, 8(2), 235–254. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s40940-023-00233-0.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
45
Article
Energy Efficiency and Environmental Impact in Façade Renovation
Strategies for Modern Sacred Architecture
Summary of the Master Thesis presented for the Master of Integrated Design - Façade Design specialization
Najmeh Najafpour 1
Supervisors: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uta Pottgiesser 1,2 , Prof. Dr.-Ing. Susanne Schwickert 1
1. Detmold School of Design, TH OWL, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany
2. Heritage & Architecture, Department of Architectural Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, Julianalaan,
134, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
Abstract
This thesis as part of the broader DFG research project, focuses on maintaining modern sacred architecture
with longitudinal hidden steel truss structures built between 1928 to 1938 in German speaking countries;
by exploring energy efficiency and environmental impact of façade renovation of such structures and how
they can be preserved and adapted for sustainable use. Using the Dreifaltigkeit Church in Herne as a case
study, the research explores adaptive reuse strategies that enhance functional and cultural relevance without
compromising historical authenticity, searching for partial adaptation rather than complete transformation. The
study evaluates thermal and energy performance, develops retrofitting strategies, and presents a structured
methodological framework that can act as guideline for similar buildings. Key findings highlight the necessity
of a holistic retrofitting approach, demonstrating that while building envelope improvements are crucial for
reducing heat loss, however upgrades to energy systems pays a crucial role as well.
Keywords: modern sacred architecture, energy-efficient retrofitting, façade renovation strategies, heritage
conservation, adaptive reuse, sustainability in architecture
1. Introduction
Façade of modern sacred architecture represents
a unique opportunity to consider both cultural
heritage and energy inefficiency issues when dealing
with renovation, making it an important subject for
research on sustainable building practices. This
thesis focuses on the façade renovation strategies
for Modern sacred buildings constructed during
the interwar period in German-speaking countries.
As part of a broader research project by DFG
(German Research Foundation) which focuses on
identifying, documenting, and maintaining modern
sacred architecture with longitudinal hidden steel
truss structures. It aligns with the third phase,
„Maintaining and Developing,“ of the DFG research
project by exploring how façade retrofitting can
enhance energy efficiency and environmental
impact of these buildings while maintaining their
architectural integrity. The research examines
energy performance challenges in such buildings,
emphasizing the need for tailored renovation
strategies that respect their historical and cultural
significance.
Despite increasing recognition of the need for
sustainable retrofitting, modern sacred architecture
remains underexplored in terms of energy-efficient
façade renovations. Existing studies on adaptive
reuse and heritage conservation often focus on
broader architectural typologies, overlooking
the unique challenges posed by churches. This
research addresses these gaps by evaluating
façade renovation strategies that improve energy
performance while ensuring compatibility with
historical preservation standards.
46
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
2. Literature review
2.1. Modern Architecture
Modern architecture, emerging in the early 20th
centuries, was defined by its use of industrial materials,
technological innovations, and a functionalist
aesthetic. The use of reinforced concrete, glass,
and steel allowed for the construction of lighter
and taller structures (“Modern Architecture,” 2024).
The movement was driven by a desire to improve
living conditions and reshape urban environments
through efficient, standardized designs (Prudon,
2008). Modernist architects sought to move away
from ornamentation and historical styles, instead
advocating for minimalist, rational forms that aligned
with the social and technological advancements of
the time (Colquhoun, 2002).
Following the First World War, modernist architecture
gained prominence in Europe, particularly
in Germany, where it was seen as a tool for
reconstruction and modernization. The destruction
caused by the war necessitated new approaches to
rebuilding, prompting architects to adopt a pragmatic
perspective (Benevolo, 1977). This period also saw
a philosophical shift, with prioritized functionality
over aesthetics, aligning with the broader cultural
and political changes of the interwar period. As
a result, movements such as Bauhaus and Neue
Sachlichkeit (New Objectivity) emerged, emphasizing
standardization, prefabrication, and the integration
of architecture with industrial production (“Modern
Architecture,” 2024; Colquhoun, 2002).
In Germany, the interwar period was particularly
influential. The Bauhaus, epitomized this shift,
promoting a design philosophy that integrated art,
craftsmanship, and technology. By the late 1920s,
the movement had evolved into Neue Sachlichkeit,
which further emphasized functionality and realism,
rejecting the expressive tendencies of earlier
architectural styles (Gössel & Leuthäuser, 2022).
However, political changes in the 1930s disrupted
this trajectory, leading to a stagnation of architectural
innovation in Germany (Pevsner, 2008).
The adoption of modernist principles extended
to sacred architecture, where religious buildings
were aligned with contemporary materials and
construction techniques. The need for costeffective,
functional structures led to the integration
of steel trusses and concrete, allowing for expansive,
column-free interiors (Fissabre et al., 2022). This
transformation of sacred architecture reflected
broader societal shifts, where churches were
designed to be more integrated into daily life rather
than serving as monumental, isolated structures
(Nagel & Linke, 1968).
2.2. Sustainability and Preservation
With the passage of time these buildings needed to be
preserved. The preservation of modern architecture
presents distinct challenges, as they were often
constructed using experimental materials and
techniques that lack durability and energy efficiency.
Early preservation efforts focused primarily on
historical monuments, while modern architecture
was largely overlooked until organizations like
ICOMOS and DOCOMOMO began advocating for
its conservation (Macdonald et al., 2015). Over time,
sustainability has emerged as a central concern in
preservation, ensuring that conservation efforts also
align with contemporary environmental goals.
Preserving modernist structures requires balancing
cultural heritage with the need for energy
efficiency. Many buildings from this era were built
without consideration for insulation, airtightness,
or energy performance, leading to poor thermal
comfort and high energy consumption (Ayón
et. al, 2019). Modern preservation strategies
must address these shortcomings by integrating
energy-efficient materials and technologies
without compromising architectural integrity. The
Eindhoven-Seoul Statement (2012) expanded on
previous DOCOMOMO principles, advocating
for conservation approaches that incorporate
sustainability and climate resilience (Docomomo
International, n.d.). This shift acknowledges that
preserving modern architecture must also involve
upgrading its environmental performance to ensure
long-term viability.
Adaptive reuse has emerged as a critical strategy
in sustainable preservation, allowing modernist
buildings to maintain their historical significance
while meeting contemporary energy standards.
Retrofitting measures, such as improved insulation,
upgraded glazing, and energy-efficient HVAC
systems, are necessary to enhance the thermal
performance of these structures while respecting
their original design intent (Prudon, 2008).
Moreover, preservationists increasingly emphasize
rehabilitation over strict restoration, ensuring that
interventions are both reversible and compatible
with existing materials (Giebeler et al., 2012). These
adaptive approaches allow heritage buildings to
remain functional and reduce the carbon footprint
associated with demolition and new construction.
The role of international policies in shaping
sustainability practices within preservation efforts
cannot be overlooked. Frameworks such as the Madrid
Document (2011) and the Burra Charter (1979) outline
methodologies for integrating conservation with
sustainable development (ICOMOS ISC20C, 2011).
Additionally, national policies, such as Germany’s
Cultural Property Protection Act and the Federal
Building Code (BauGB), provide legal guidelines for
balancing historical preservation with environmental
upgrades (Federal Government of Germany, n.d.).
By aligning modern architecture conservation with
sustainability objectives, these regulations ensure
that energy efficiency improvements contribute
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
47
to both heritage conservation and contemporary
climate action goals.
2.3. Energy Efficiency in Heritage
Preservation
The implementation of energy efficiency policies has
played a crucial role in shaping the preservation of
heritage buildings while addressing sustainability
concerns. Regulatory frameworks such as the
European Union’s Energy Performance of Buildings
Directive (EPBD) have established strict energy
efficiency targets, requiring member states to
improve the performance of their building stock.
This directive mandates nearly zero-energy
standards for new constructions while incentivizing
retrofits for existing buildings (Energy Performance
of Buildings Directive, n.d.). Similarly, Germany’s
Building Energy Act (GEG) integrates national energy
conservation laws to improve efficiency in both
modern and heritage structures, with exemptions
for listed buildings to balance conservation needs
(“Energieeinsparverordnung,” 2024).
At the international level, initiatives such as the Paris
Agreement (2015) and the European Green Deal
(2019) have reinforced the need to retrofit existing
buildings to meet carbon reduction targets (The
Paris Agreement | United Nations, n.d.; European
Commission, n.d.). However, implementing energy
retrofits in historic buildings presents unique
challenges, particularly in maintaining architectural
authenticity while improving thermal performance.
To address these challenges, frameworks like EN
16883 provide guidelines for integrating energy
efficiency measures while preserving historical
significance (European Standards, n.d.).
The need to retrofit modern heritage buildings
require careful adaptation of contemporary
energy efficiency measures without compromising
architectural integrity. Strategies such as passive
climate control, improved insulation, and selective
façade retrofits offer viable solutions for enhancing
thermal performance while respecting historical
structures (Troi & Bastian, 2014). However, challenges
remain in balancing regulatory requirements, costeffectiveness,
and cultural heritage considerations.
These complexities highlight the necessity of
a methodological approach that integrates
sustainability principles with the architectural
preservation of modern sacred buildings. The
following section will explore the methodological
framework adopted to address these challenges
within the context of this study.
the church‘s historical background and technical
characteristics. Finally, its location is analysed to
discuss its adaptive reuse possibilities. It is important
to note that the church is both a listed building as
well as an active place of worship, necessitating
only minimal interventions for its adaptive reuse.
As a result, the design suggestions remain limited
to respect the church’s historical and functional
significance.
Defining energy goals is the next step. These goals
are associated with the changes introduced through
retrofitting, with particular emphasis on buildingskin-related
measures. The analysis is done by
EVEBI, an energy simulation software. A detailed
assessment of the current energy performance of
the building’s façade components and proposed
retrofit measures will follow suit.
3.1. St. Dreifaltigkeit Church Overview
St. Dreifaltigkeit Church in Herne, located at
Börsinghauser Str. 60, was constructed between
1931 and 1932 by architect Karl Wibbe in response
to the rapid population growth due to coal mining
expansion in the area. The church was designed
with a steel truss structure to mitigate potential
mining-related damage, a concern raised by the
mining authorities. The interior design features a
net-like ceiling structure and a semicircular altar
area which was adorned with a mural of the Holy
Trinity by Ernst Bahn. During World War II, the
church sustained significant damage and underwent
extensive reconstruction, completed in 1946.
Further modifications included a new slate roof and
the addition of a weekday chapel in the subsequent
years. The church was officially listed as a monument
in 2009. Architecturally, it is distinguished by its
clinker brick façade, a massive west tower with
pyramid-shaped roofs, and stained-glass windows
added in the late 1960s by Nikolaus Bette.
3. Methodology
The St. Dreifaltigkeit Church in Herne, a sacred
building amongst the ones identified in the DFG
project, is the thesis sample study that will be
analyzed. The analysis begins with an overview of the
study sample, followed by a detailed examination of
Figure 1. St. Dreifaltigkeit church front view (DFG
funded project ‚525823438‘, 2024) .
48
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
3.2. Adaptive reuse suggestions
Figure 2. Construction process of the steel
truss structure of the church (Pfarrgemeinde St.
Dreifaltigkeit HerneHolthausen, 1983, p. 35).
The church‘s surroundings provide significant
contextual insights into its adaptive reuse potential.
Positioned centrally within a neighbourhood that
accommodates families and children, with a Catholic
daycare centre to its south and an elementary
school to its north, the church is embedded in a
community-oriented environment.
Figure 4. Neighbourhood figure-ground usage plan.
Figure 3. St. Dreifaltigkeit existing plan.
The design prioritizes structural stability while
maintaining visual openness. The foundation
comprises a concrete ring with robust concrete pillars,
allowing the steel truss to be detached and realigned
if necessary. The roof features an arched steel band
structure supporting a layered construction, with
wooden shingles covering the exterior. The church
walls are composed of masonry concrete blocks
with a clinker brick exterior, a hallmark of Brick
Expressionism. This material selection enhances
durability and weather resistance while preserving
the building‘s historical character.
This spatial setting suggests an opportunity to extend
its function beyond religious services, integrating
weekday activities that align with the needs of the
locals. The neighbourhood’s mix of educational and
residential functions presents a clear framework for
the adaptive reuse function of the church as a multipurpose
space.
The adaptive reuse must balance multiple
considerations, including community needs,
architectural integrity, and religious significance.
Given the interest of church authorities in expanding
its role, proposals focus on minimal interventions
that enhance the building’s usability without
compromising its sacred character. Suggested
strategies include hosting after-school programs,
tutoring sessions, and educational workshops,
leveraging its proximity to schools. Additionally, the
church’s acoustics and open interior space make it
Figure 5. Adaptive reuse suggestion - section view.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
49
suitable for cultural events, such as music recitals,
art exhibitions, and community gatherings. To
achieve this, flexible interior modifications, such as
temporary partitions and adaptable furnishings, can
be introduced to create multifunctional areas while
preserving the church’s architectural authenticity.
These adaptive reuse strategies ensure that the
church remains a central spiritual hub while evolving
to meet contemporary community demands,
securing its long-term relevance.
analysed; made of concrete and plaster, exhibited
the highest thermal losses with a U-value of 3.941
W/m²K. By integrating calcium silicate and a vapour
retarder, the retrofitted version significantly lowers
this value to 0.833 W/m²K.
3.3. Thermal Performance Evaluation:
Existing and Retrofitted
The thermal performance analysis of St. Dreifaltigkeit
Church highlights the inefficiencies of the existing
building envelope in meeting the energetic needs
for modern regulations. Since the Church is a
listed building, it is exempted from complying with
Buildings Energy Act (GEG), however, implementing
such measures could set a valuable example of how
heritage buildings can achieve energy efficiency
without compromising their historical value.
The original structure exhibits high thermal losses,
particularly through the roof and windows, due
to outdated materials and insufficient insulation.
The existing U-values indicate significant heat
transfer, contributing to increased energy
demand and poor indoor thermal comfort. The
exterior walls, while somewhat more efficient, still
fall short of contemporary energy performance
standards. To enhance energy efficiency, retrofitting
measures were implemented, focusing on material
upgrades and additional insulation layers. since
detailed information about the composition of the
component was not available (during the study
process) approximation was used.
Floor
The existing floor structure consists of limestone,
mortar, cement screed, concrete, and compacted
soil, with the U-value of 1.209 W/m²K. The retrofitting
strategy introduces foam glass insulation and an
impact sound mat, significantly reducing the U-value
to 0.162 W/m²K. This enhances thermal efficiency
while ensuring structural stability and compatibility
with the original materials. Also, an overhaul of the
floor presents an opportunity to lay the pipework for
the heating system upgrades.
Roof
The roof of the whole church was analysed in two
configurations: shingle and copper covering. The
existing shingle-covered roof comprises wooden
shingles and boards, with a U-value of 1.913 W/
m²K (for the sake of simplification in the simulation
process with EVEBI). The retrofitted version
incorporates wool wood insulation and a damp
barrier, reducing the U-value to 0.129 W/m²K. as for
the copper-covered roof, only the bottom layer was
Figure 6. Roof structures map relevant to the study.
Walls
The church’s original exterior walls, constructed
from clinker bricks, cement mortar, concrete blocks,
and plaster, provided moderate insulation with a
U-value of 0.922 W/m²K. Retrofitting efforts included
the addition of calcium silicate insulation while
maintaining the original brick façade, reducing the
U-value to 0.498 W/m²K. This intervention ensures
improved thermal performance while preserving the
building’s historic character. However, the thermal
performance of the retrofitted wall can improve with
the increase in insulation depth.
Windows
The original windows, composed of single-glazed
stained glass, were the weakest thermal component,
with a U-value of 4.398 W/m²K. Retrofitting involved
adding secondary double-glazed window behind the
stained glass, significantly improving insulation and
reducing the U-value to 1.875 W/m²K. This upgrade
enhances energy efficiency while maintaining the
architectural and aesthetic integrity of the church.
These retrofitting measures collectively contribute
to reducing heat losses, improving indoor thermal
comfort, and enhancing the overall energy efficiency
of the building while preserving its historical and
cultural significance.
50
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Table 1. Thermal Performance Evaluation: Existing and Retrofitted
Component
Original U-value
[W/m²K]
Retrofitted U-value
[W/m²K]
Material Layers (Existing)
Material Layers (Retrofitted)
Floor 1.209 0.162 Limestone, Mortar, Cement screed,
Concrete, Compacted soil
Limestone, Mortar, Cement screed, Foam glass insulation,
Impact sound mat, Compacted soil
Roof (Shingle
Covering)
1.913 0.129 Wooden shingles, Wooden board Wooden shingles, Wooden board, Wool wood insulation,
Damp barrier, Additional wool wood insulation
Roof (Copper
Covering)
3.941 0.833 Concrete, Plaster Concrete, Calcium silicate, Damp barrier, Plaster
Exterior Wall 0.922 0.498 Clinker bricks, Cement mortar,
Concrete block, Plaster
Clinker bricks, Cement mortar, Concrete block, Calcium
silicate insulation, Plaster
Window 4.398 1.875 Single-glazed stained-glass, Wooden
frame
Double-glazed stained-glass, Reinforced wooden frame
Figure 7. Plan, elevation and section detail existing
façade.
Figure 8. Plan, elevation and section detail after
façade retrofit.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
51
4. Results
In this part the result of the energy retrofit will be
discussed. This is possible first through investigation
of the existing building and its current energy
consumption, and then application of the retrofitted
scenario and the subsequent changes in demand
and consumption pattern.
For ease of comprehension in the next part the
retrofitted actions are introduced as steps but by
no means do they imply the necessity of application
based on this hierarchy. On the contrary, the
recommended steps should be chosen based on
the consultation with stakeholders and experts,
immediate needs, energy regulation and financial
capacity just to name influential factors.
4.2. Energy Evaluation: Retrofitted
Step 1: Floor
The floor retrofit included insulation layers beneath
the original stone flooring, contributing to a 10.8%
reduction in primary energy demand. Heat transfer
loss improved by 12.7%, decreasing from 1.50 W/m²K
to 1.31 W/m²K. These changes enhance the thermal
efficiency of the floor, addressing one of the major
areas of heat loss.
Step 2: Roof
Roof insulation had the most significant impact,
reducing primary energy demand by 42.37% and
heat transfer loss by 56.25%, from 1.31 W/m²K to 0.68
W/m²K. This step drastically improved the building‘s
thermal envelope, as the roof was previously one of
the largest sources of heat loss.
Figure 9. Energy retrofit measure concept.
4.1. Energy Evaluation: Existing
The energy performance evaluation of the existing
church focuses on the main heated area, as it
undergoes adaptive reuse. Key metrics derived from
GEG 2024 and DIN V 18599, such as primary energy
demand (QP) and heat transfer loss (HT), serve as
benchmarks to assess efficiency. The building‘s
energy classification, based on final energy demand
(kWh/m²·a), indicates poor performance, with a
primary energy demand of 1,148.6 kWh/(m²·a)—far
exceeding benchmarks for both modernized old
buildings (301.3 kWh/(m²·a)) and new constructions.
The classification highlights the urgent need for
retrofitting measures to address excessive heat loss
and non-compliance with sustainability standards.
Additionally, energy flow analysis reveals that the
highest losses occur through the roof and walls,
followed by windows and floors.
The results underscore the necessity of enhancing
insulation, improving air sealing, and integrating
renewable energy sources to align with regulatory
requirements. The current inefficiencies not only
impact operational costs but also contribute to
high CO2 emissions, reinforcing the importance of
intervention. The next section explores potential
retrofit strategies to improve thermal performance
and energy efficiency while maintaining the
architectural integrity of the church.
Step 3: Walls
Wall insulation further enhanced efficiency, lowering
primary energy demand by 10.95% and heat transfer
loss by 14.29%, from 0.68 W/m²K to 0.52 W/m²K.
While its impact was lower than the roof, it played a
crucial role in reducing energy losses and improving
overall thermal comfort.
Step 4: Windows
The addition of secondary glazing reduced primary
energy demand by 9.08%, from 500.1 kWh/m²a
to 410.8 kWh/m²a. Heat transfer loss dropped
by 26.92%, from 0.52 W/m²K to 0.38 W/m²K. This
intervention significantly improved insulation while
preserving the church’s historical appearance.
Step 5: Heating System
A water-to-water heat pump replaced the outdated
oil heating system, reducing primary energy demand
by 48.78%. The building‘s energy efficiency class
improved significantly, decreasing from 370.8 kWh/
m²a to 116.9 kWh/m²a, marking one of the most
drastic changes in the retrofit.
Step 6: Photovoltaic Panels
The integration of photovoltaic (PV) panels further
enhanced energy efficiency, reducing primary
energy demand by 21.76%, from 210.5 kWh/m²a to
164.7 kWh/m²a. This intervention introduced on-site
renewable energy generation, decreasing reliance
on non-renewable sources.
52
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Table 2. Energy efficiency and primary energy demand,
Heat transfer loss and CO2 Emission reduction evaluation across the 6 steps
heating and renewable energy integration. These
results highlight the need for a holistic retrofitting
strategy that considers both passive and active
energy measures.
Figure 10. Existing (red) and retrofitted (green)
building’s energy flow.
5. Conclusions
This study explores the energy efficiency,
environmental impact, and façade renovation
strategies of modern sacred architecture, focusing
on churches with longitudinal hidden steel truss
structures. The primary objective was to assess the
thermal and energy performance of the sample case
study and propose retrofit solutions that balance
historical authenticity with sustainability. Through
the case study of the St. Dreifaltigkeit Church in
Herne, this research examines how adaptive reuse
and targeted façade interventions can extend the
functional and cultural relevance of sacred buildings
while improving their energy efficiency.
A key aspect of this study was to establish a
methodological framework for preserving and
adapting modern sacred architecture. Rather
than prescribing a universal solution, the research
comes to the conclusion that for such significant
buildings only tailored solutions could work. It
offers a structured approach that can be tailored
to individual buildings based on their architectural
and contextual conditions. The findings emphasize
that while building envelope interventions, such
as insulation and glazing upgrades, reduce heat
loss, significant improvements in energy efficiency
classification require systemic upgrades, including
By bridging the gap between heritage conservation
and energy performance optimization, this
research contributes to the broader discourse on
sustainable preservation. The study underscores
the importance of adapting sacred buildings
to contemporary energy standards without
compromising their historical significance. The
methodological approach developed here serves
as a reference point for decision-makers navigating
similar renovation challenges, ensuring that sacred
architecture remains functional, culturally relevant,
and environmentally responsible in the long term.
5.1. Limitations
This study encountered several challenges,
particularly regarding the availability and accuracy
of material data for the building components. The
lack of precise documentation for the physical
properties of materials in the St. Dreifaltigkeit
Church necessitated the use of approximations
derived from standards and literature. While these
estimates provided a reasonable basis for energy
performance simulations, they may not fully reflect
the actual thermal and structural characteristics
of the building. Additionally, material investigations
within the broader DFG project, such as 3D scanning
and sampling, were still in progress, limiting their
integration into this research. Another major
challenge arose from the church’s heritage status,
which imposed strict conservation constraints
on retrofitting measures. This restricted potential
interventions, particularly concerning façade
renovation, requiring careful alignment with
preservation regulations.
Beyond technical and regulatory constraints,
the study‘s reliance on a single case study limits
the generalizability of its conclusions. While the
developed methodology offers a structured
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
53
framework for retrofitting modern sacred buildings,
each case demands tailored solutions based on
its unique architectural and historical context.
Time constraints also prevented the inclusion of a
comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA), which
would have enriched the evaluation of environmental
impacts. Additionally, while EVEBI was a useful tool
for energy simulation, relying solely on one software
may have introduced biases; future research could
benefit from cross-validation with other tools.
5.2. Suggestions
To further improve the building’s energy
performance, increasing the thickness of wall
insulation in the building envelope is recommended.
A greater insulation depth would lower U-values,
reducing heat transfer and enhancing overall
thermal efficiency. However, this must be assessed
for structural feasibility and user comfort. Another
key recommendation is replacing the existing roof
composition with modern insulating materials, as the
current materials fail to meet contemporary energy
performance standards. Given the church’s heritage
status, this intervention would require approval from
conservation authorities. If a roof replacement is
undertaken, it presents an opportunity to integrate
photovoltaic (PV) panels, enabling on-site renewable
energy generation while improving energy efficiency.
Beyond direct interventions, a holistic approach
should include professional assessments for
structural stability, fire safety, and heating system
optimization. Structural engineers must evaluate
the feasibility of increasing insulation depth and
replacing the roof without compromising the
integrity of the building. Fire safety specialists
should ensure compliance with regulations,
particularly when introducing new insulation
materials. Additionally, renewable energy integration
should be optimized through detailed feasibility
studies considering shading, orientation, and
surface area. Other sustainability measures, such
as circular economy principles and embodied
carbon analysis, can further enhance the process.
Expanding renewable energy sources beyond PV
panels, including geothermal systems, could provide
additional benefits. Implementing these strategies
would enhance the building’s sustainability while
preserving its architectural and cultural significance.
6. References
Ayón, A., & Pottgiesser, U. (2019). Reglazing Modernism:
Intervention Strategies for 20th-Century Icons. Birkhäuser.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035619348
Colquhoun, A. (2002). Modern Architecture. OUP Oxford.
Benevolo, L. (1977). History of Modern Architecture. MIT
Press.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). (2024). Project
525823438. Retrieved from https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/
projekt/525823438
Docomomo International. (n.d.). Retrieved January 24,
2025, from https://docomomo.com/organization/
Energieeinsparverordnung. (2024). In
Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.
title=Energieeinsparverordnung&oldid=1241390077
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. (n.d.). Retrieved
January 4, 2025, from https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/
energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/energyperformance-buildings-directive_en
European Commission. (n.d.). Renovation wave. Retrieved
January 2, 2025, from https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/
energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/renovationwave_en
European Standards. (n.d.). CSN EN 16883—Conservation
of cultural heritage—Guidelines for improving the energy
performance of historic buildings. Https://Www.En-
Standard.Eu. Retrieved January 4, 2025, from https://
www.en-standard.eu/csn-en-16883-conservation-ofcultural-heritage-guidelines-for-improving-the-energyperformance-of-historic-buildings/
Federal Government of Germany. (n.d.).
Kulturgutschutzgesetz – Gesetz zum Schutz von Kulturgut.
Kulturgutschutz Deutschland. Retrieved December 28,
2024, from https://www.kulturgutschutz-deutschland.de/
Fissabre, A., Rottke, E., Pottgiesser, U., & Thiele, K. (2022).
Längsbinderkirchen und versteckte Stahlkonstruktionen
im Sakralbau der Hochmoderne. [Unpublished project
report]. FH Aachen, TH OWL, TU Braunschweig.
Giebeler, G., Krause, H., Fisch, R., Musso, F., Lenz, B., &
Rudolphi, A. (2012). Refurbishment Manual: Maintenance,
Conversions, Extensions. Birkhäuser. https://doi.
org/10.11129/detail.9783034614337
Gössel, P., & Leuthäuser, G. (2022). Architektur des 20.
Jahrhunderts. TASCHEN.
ICOMOS ISC20C. (2011). Approaches for the Conservation
of Twentieth-Century Architectural Heritage (Madrid
Document 2011).
Macdonald, S., Normandin, K. C., & Kindred, B. (2015).
Conservation of Modern Architecture. Routledge.
Modern architecture. (2024). In Wikipedia. https://
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Modern_
architecture&oldid=1260115736
Nagel, S., & Linke, S. (Eds.). (1968). Kirchliches Bauen.
Pevsner, N. (2008). Europäische Architektur: Von den
Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart (9. Complete Overcoloured.
edition). Prestel Verlag.
Pfarrgemeinde St. Dreifaltigkeit Herne-Holthausen. (1983).
Festschrift der Pfarrgemeinde St. Dreifaltigkeit Herne-
Holthausen anlässlich des 75-jährigen Bestehens der
Pfarrgemeinde. Pfarrgemeinde St. Dreifaltigkeit.
Prudon, T. H. M. (2008). Preservation of Modern
Architecture (1st edition). Wiley.
The Paris Agreement | United Nations. (n.d.). United
Nations Climate Change. Retrieved January 4, 2025,
from https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/parisagreement?utm_medium=website&utm
Troi, A., & Bastian, Z. (Eds.). (2014). Energy Efficiency
Solutions for Historic Buildings: A Handbook. Birkhäuser.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038216
54
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Integrating Machine Learning with Circular Economy
Article
Bahareh Hemmatikhanshir 1
1. Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany
Abstract
The growing challenges of environmental degradation and resource scarcity have highlighted the urgent
need for a shift from traditional linear economic models to circular economy (CE). The concept of circularity
economy aims to minimize waste and optimize resource use by promoting practices like product reuse, repair,
and recycling. However, the practical implementation of CE faces significant barriers, including complexities
in reverse logistics, product lifecycle prediction, and recycling processes. Machine learning (ML) has emerged
as a powerful tool to overcome some of these obstacles, offering solutions such as predictive maintenance,
intelligent sorting, and optimized resource management. This paper explores the integration of ML into circular
economy practices, particularly in the context of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry.
By reviewing recent literature, we examine how ML can support circular economy principles, identify the current
applications and effectiveness of ML in promoting CE, and explore the potential for scaling and optimizing MLbased
solutions. Furthermore, we discuss the technical and organizational barriers to implementing ML in CE,
aiming to bridge the gap between technological advancements and practical adoption. This research provides
insights into the future potential of ML to accelerate the transition toward a sustainable circular economy.
Keywords: machine learning, circular economy, artificial intelligence, sustainability, AEC industry
1. Introduction
Environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and
technological advancement have caused a paradigm
shift from traditional linear economic models toward
circular economy (CE) frameworks. As global waste
generation is projected to reach 3.4 billion tones
by 2050, the imperative to transition from a ‚takemake-waste‘
model to a regenerative system has
never been more urgent. This disruptive production
approach has raised serious concerns regarding
health, biodiversity, climate, and our overall
atmosphere (Kaza et al., 2018).
A promising solution to these issues, is known as
circularity which is the idea of diminishing waste
production by designing products that can be
reused, repaired, refurbished, upgraded and
disassembled; hence, extending a product‘s life
cycle to its maximum. The circular economy concept,
which aims to separate economic growth from
resource consumption through closed-loop systems,
faces significant operational challenges in its
practical implementation. These challenges include
the complexity of reverse logistics, the difficulty in
predicting product lifecycles, and the inefficiencies
in waste sorting and recycling processes.
Recent technological advancements in artificial
intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have
created unprecedented opportunities to enhance
the effectiveness of circular economy initiatives (All
Noman et al., 2022). Within this context, machine
learning (ML) emerges as a transformative tool that
can accelerate the implementation and optimization
of circular economy principles across architecture,
engineering, and construction (AEC) industry.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
55
From predictive maintenance that extends product
lifespans to intelligent sorting systems that improve
recycling efficiency, ML algorithms are increasingly
being utilized to support circular business models.
However, despite these developments, there
remains a significant gap in our understanding of
how ML applications can be systematically integrated
into circular economy frameworks to maximize their
impact. This research paper aims to address this
knowledge gap by providing an analysis of current
machine learning applications in circular economy
context, and identifying potential areas for future
development. Through a review of existing literature
and studies, ML was examined how it can serve as
a catalyst for circular economy adoption across AEC
industry and scales of operation.
The volume and area of research related to the
circular economy using machine learning approaches
have significantly increased, creating a vast amount
of bibliometric information (All Noman et al., 2022).
In this research, we presented a study of literature
concerning the adoption of machine learning in the
circular economy.
This article focuses on three primary research
questions:
1. What are the current applications and effectiveness
of ML in supporting circular economy principles?
2. How can ML applications be scaled and optimized
to accelerate the transition toward a circular
economy?
The selected literature was then categorized into
thematic groups: ML for waste reduction, product
lifecycle optimization, supply chain and resource
efficiency, and energy savings. This categorization
facilitated a focused analysis of how ML contributes
to various aspects of the circular economy. For each
study, details were extracted on their objectives,
methodology, and outcomes, emphasizing their
contributions to circular economy goals such as
reduced waste, cost savings, and material recovery
rates.
2.1. Understanding Circular Economy
The circular economy represents a paradigm shift
from the traditional linear economic model of „takemake-dispose“
to a regenerative approach that
emphasizes the „reduce, reuse, recycle“ principle
(Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2019). Any system
based on continual extraction and consumption
will eventually experience limits to growth. Today’s
economy is hugely wasteful, which results in large
losses of value (Vogiantzi et al., 2023) For example,
in 2016 the world produced 45 million tonnes of
electronic waste (e-waste), with an estimated value of
EUR 55 billion in raw materials. A hefty portion of this
value is never recovered, as only 20% of this waste
is collected and recycled appropriately. Similarly,
the global food system currently grows more than
enough food to feed the world’s population, but
roughly a third is lost or wasted throughout the
supply chain and during consumption (United
Nations, 2011).
3. What technical and organizational barriers exist
in implementing ML solutions for circular economy?
2. Methodology
This literature review aims to explore the intersection
of machine learning (ML) and circular economy (CE)
by identifying key themes, recent advancements, and
research gaps in the application of ML for circular
practices. The scope of this narrative review is
limited to peer-reviewed journal articles, conference
proceedings, and reports from the past 20 years,
ensuring that the analysis reflects developments and
state-of-the-art applications. The primary keywords
included „machine learning,“ „circular economy,“
„product lifecycle,“ along with secondary terms like
„predictive modelling“ and optimization“.
To identify relevant literature, databases such as
IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google
Scholar were used. Inclusion criteria required that
selected studies focus on ML applications that
directly address circular economy principles, such
as waste reduction, recycling, lifecycle optimization,
and supply chain efficiency. articles that focused on
environmental studies or recycling practices without
the integration of ML or CE objectives were excluded.
Figure 1: Linear, Recycling and Circular Economies.
This transformation is driven by increasing
environmental concerns, resource scarcity, and the
need for sustainable business practices. The concept
extends beyond mere recycling to encompass the
entire product lifecycle, from design and production
to consumption and recovery. The fundamental
difference between circularity in consumer goods and
the built environment lies in their scale, complexity,
and lifespan characteristics. While consumer goods
are typically designed for easy disassembly and
recycling (like cars with 95% recyclability), buildings
present unique challenges due to their massive
scale, 30-50 years lifespan, and complex layered
construction methods. (Voulvoulis, 2022). Buildings
56
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
often require heavy machinery for demolition and
face challenges with material separation due to
common practices like wet construction methods,
hidden installations, and extensive use of adhesives
and sealants. To address these challenges, the future
of circular building design must focus on Design
for Disassembly principles, modular construction
systems, exposed systems for easy maintenance,
and dry construction methods prioritization. This
shift requires not only technical innovations but
also systemic changes, including standardization
of building components, development of reversible
connection systems, and integration of circularity
principles in building codes. Unlike consumer
goods where repair, reuse, and recycling pathways
are well-established, the built environment needs
specific solutions that account for its unique
characteristics while still achieving circular economy
goals of waste reduction and resource efficiency.
Another example from the AEC industry would be
“Villa Welpeloo house and art studio” designed and
constructed by Superuse Studios in 2005. Whilst the
house is certainly architecturally striking, there are
two features of its creation that make it especially
noteworthy. Firstly, 60% of the house is made up
of materials salvaged from the local area, Steel was
also sourced from machinery previously used in
textile production, a once-prominent industry in
the Enschede region of the Netherlands, where the
house is located. The wood used in the facade was
taken from 200 damaged cable reels, which gave
pieces of uniform size and shape. This wood would
traditionally be turned into particleboard (or worse,
end up incinerated) effectively shortcutting the
usefulness of the material. The desire to salvage also
led to the design process being conducted in parallel
with the materialization process. The „Superuse“
strategy of changing a material’s performance has
not only been adopted as the name of the firm itself
but has also been researched and used on around
90% of its 180 projects (Bartolini, 2021). In a circular
economy, creating value is increasingly decoupled
from consuming finite resources. It presents
organisations small and large, local and global,
private and public, with the potential to create an
economy that is distributed, diverse, and inclusive.
Related to the role of the architectural designer,
Galle et al. (2015) discussed the need to change from
the short-term involvements of the designer to longterm
engagements to encourage lifecycle thinking
and the well-considered management of buildings.
Kozminska (2019) argued that the circular design
process differs substantially from the standard
design approach based upon the investigation of a set
of architectural case studies. Accordingly, the design
process requires interdisciplinary collaboration
and should encompass the lifecycle of materials to
define future methods of maintenance, disassembly
and the reuse of materials. Finally, Kanters (2020)
discussed how architects can play a pivotal role in
the transition to a CE by linking different actors (e.g.,
client, contractor, other consultants, engineers) but
will need to develop leadership skills to fulfil this role.
In addition, they will need to develop the ability to
work with flexibility in the design process and acquire
deeper material and construction knowledge.
2.2. Understanding Machine Learning
Machine learning is a branch of Artificial Intelligence
that benefits from computer algorithms that learn
from data, analyse and draw inferences from
complex data patterns, and make predictions with
minimal human intervention. (Zhou, 2021). ML
algorithms have been developed throughout the past
decades, based on statistical methods, automated
and optimized to provide predictions. This training
process can be repeated and configured to improve
the quality of derived results. ML algorithms can
detect significant dependencies between the
data features of real-time datasets and this ability
can identify opportunities for circular solutions.
(Prioux et al., 2023). An intelligent economic system
continuously demands innovative solutions to boost
the quality and sustainability of actions relate to
the whole system while diminishing costs. In this
circumstance, technologies driven by artificial
intelligence are ready to render in the new industrial
paradigms (Gupta, 2018). Artificial intelligence is
organized into various subsets like data mining,
machine learning and deep learning. Artificial
intelligence is a combination of mathematical
reasoning and error reducing functionalities (Awan
et al., 2021). ML, as part of the emergent „Fourth
Industrial Revolution”, can support and accelerate
the pace of human innovation to design products,
bring together aspects of successful circular business
models, and optimise the infrastructure needed to
loop products and materials back into the economy.
Utilising ML capabilities could create a step change
which goes beyond realising incremental efficiency
gains to help design an effective economic system
that is regenerative by design (Ellen MacArthur
Foundation, 2010). The contribution of AI has been
proven significant towards making the ground to
achieve global sustainable development (Oke, 2004).
Therefore, artificial intelligence can be a great aid in
solving vital issues related to an intelligent circular
economic system (e.g., sustainable manufacturing
system, waste management, reverse logistics,
optimization of energy sources, supply chain
management).
Creating and implementing AI-based applications
requires a set of basic elements to be in place.
Experts are needed for algorithm optimization and
development, preparation of training data and the
translation of the algorithm output into results that
make sense for human needs. Another requirement
is the availability of sufficient high-quality data to
train the algorithm. „Rubbish in, rubbish out“ means
that badly engineered data leads to poor quality
outputs. According to Haefner et al. (2023), despite
creating 2.5 quintillion bytes of data daily (as a
comparison, this number is equivalent to a quarter
of all living insects at any moment), most of this data
is not usable for AI due to insufficient data labelling.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
57
Also, data privacy and security can limit usage and
access. This points to another basic element: AI
infrastructure. For example, to capture value from
AI, organisations need to establish digital processes,
an open culture around AI, and on a technical level,
appropriate processing power to handle all data
inputs (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2019).
In summary, the need for ML stems from the
inherent challenges posed by the abundance of
data and the complexity of modern problems. By
harnessing the power of machine learning, we can
identify hidden insights, make accurate predictions,
and revolutionize industries, ultimately shaping a
future that profits from intelligent automation and
data-driven decision-making.
3.Result
3.1. Current effectiveness of ML in
supporting CE
According to recent research, digital technologies
have an urgent role and increasing involvement
to enhance CE solutions to overcome current
challenges (Bressanelli et al., 2018; Kortelainen et
al., 2019). Digital technologies contribute to product
visibility through intelligent sensors and provide
information on assets, location, condition and
availability (Antikainen et al., 2018). Currently, one
of the most important roles of circular business
models is to share and lease the products instead of
selling (Bocken et al., 2016; D. Waughray et al., 2018)
mention that digitalization is one of the key solutions
in accelerating the move towards circularity.
Moreover, utilizing digital technologies such as AI,
IoT or Blockchain enhances the ways in developing
and improving transparency and traceability
throughout product lifetime (Stankovic, 2017). In
a digital world, producers have the opportunity to
monitor, control, analyze and optimize products’
performance through smart, connected products
and to collect valuable data of the usage of materials,
components and goods (Porter et al. 2014). ML
has emerged as a powerful tool in supporting CE
principles, with current applications demonstrating
its capacity to improve resource efficiency, extend
product lifecycles, and enhance waste management
processes. From an architectural perspective, ML can
play a transformative role in advancing CE principles
through smarter, more sustainable building design,
material selection, and lifecycle management. ML
techniques are actively used across various CE
practices:
3.1.1. Material Selection and Optimization for
Longevity:
ML models can analyse historical data on building
materials, evaluating durability, environmental
impact, and maintenance needs over time.
This enables architects and engineers to select
materials with lower carbon footprints and
longer lifespans, aligning with circular economy
principles. For instance, ML algorithms can assess
the environmental impact of different materials by
analysing embodied carbon data and predicting their
performance under specific climate conditions. By
selecting sustainable materials that require minimal
replacement or maintenance, architects can design
buildings that are inherently circular, contributing to
resource conservation over the structure’s lifecycle.
Recent studies from the Building Research
Establishment (BRE) demonstrate compelling
evidence for ML‘s effectiveness in sustainable
building material selection. Analysis of 50,000
material samples across 25 years of historical data
shows that ML models achieve 88-94% accuracy in
predicting material performance. When examining
specific materials, ML-enhanced assessment has
extended predicted lifespans significantly: concrete
durability estimates improved from 50-60 years to
65-75 years (92% accuracy), while steel projections
increased from 40-50 years to 45-55 years (89%
accuracy) (BRE, 2023).
Table 1: Material lifespan analysis (source: BRE,2023)
“According to International Journal of Sustainable
Construction, 2023. Optimizing Materials for
Sustainability: Machine Learning Applications
in Concrete Mixtures. International Journal of
Sustainable Construction, 12(4), pp. 134-145”. the
environmental impact is particularly noteworthy,
with ML-optimized concrete mixtures reducing
embodied carbon from 333 kg CO2e to 278 kg COe
per cubic meter, representing a 16.5% reduction.
Performance under varying climate conditions
has also improved, with ML predicting material
degradation at 8-10% per decade compared to
traditional assessments of 12-15%, marking a 35%
improvement in prediction accuracy. Cost-benefit
analysis over a 50-year lifecycle reveals that while
ML-optimized solutions have higher initial costs
($98/m² versus $85/m² for traditional materials),
they result in lower maintenance costs ($2.8/m²/
year compared to $4.2/m²/year), leading to total
lifecycle savings of $57/m². Implementation results
from 15 commercial buildings using ML-optimized
materials show remarkable improvements: 24.5%
better energy efficiency, 32.7% reduction in
maintenance costs, 15.3% increase in material
longevity, and a 27.8% decrease in carbon footprint.
The ML models, utilizing both Random Forest (91%
accuracy) and Neural Network (89% accuracy)
approaches, consider multiple variables including
weather resistance (35% importance), material
composition (28%), installation methods (22%), and
environmental factors (15%). These improvements
translate to substantial environmental benefits per
building, including annual reductions of 23.5 metric
58
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
tons in CO2 emissions, 18.7% in water usage, 21.3%
in energy consumption, and 15.9% in waste material
(Adel, 2023).
3.1.2. Predictive Maintenance and Lifecycle
Extension of Building Components
ML-based predictive maintenance systems can help
monitor the condition of a building‘s façade, HVAC
systems, and structural elements in real-time. By
using sensor data to forecast when components
may need repair or replacement, architects and
facility managers can take preventative actions,
extending the life of building components and
reducing waste (Hennik Group, 2020). For example,
a machine learning system might detect early signs
of façade degradation due to exposure to salty
winds in coastal areas or fluctuating temperatures.
With timely interventions, the building’s façade
can be preserved for longer, reducing the need for
frequent replacements and minimizing material
waste—a key circular economy goal. ML will expand
our capability to retain, analyse, make predictions,
and make informed decisions from collected data.
Not only helping operators to make decisions, but
ML is currently performing cognitive functions
traditionally reserved for humans. In the facility
management profession, operationalized ML can
provide unbiased repair responses and investment
decisions. Full operational capability will be achieved
when AI is monitoring the operational characteristics
of the facility systems, records the data, analyses
the data, develops recommendations based on the
data, and presents the recommendations to facility
management professionals to make decisions (Feng,
C. et al, 2020).
3.1.3. Design for Deconstruction and Adaptive
Reuse:
ML can significantly enhance design strategies that
support circular economy principles by optimizing
the reuse and recycling potential of building
components. By analyzing historical data from past
construction projects, ML algorithms can identify
which structural systems, connection methods,
and material choices are most conducive to easy
disassembly. For instance, models can examine the
performance and flexibility of various connection
types, guiding architects towards selecting
components that are more easily detached and
reused, thereby extending the lifecycle of materials
(Bianchine et al., 2019). Additionally, ML can optimize
modular construction approaches by studying
deconstruction patterns to recommend the use of
prefabricated components. This not only accelerates
construction and assembly but also simplifies future
disassembly, allowing entire sections of buildings
to be reconfigured or relocated with minimal waste
(Scipioni et al., 2021). Furthermore, predictive analysis
capabilities of ML systems can assess the condition
and reuse potential of materials, such as steel
beams, wood panels, or facade elements, before
demolition begins. This enables construction firms
to recover high-value materials efficiently, optimizing
resource flows and reducing the environmental
impact associated with conventional demolition
(Bianchini et al., 2019). By focusing on adaptive reuse,
these technologies contribute to a more sustainable
and circular approach in the construction industry.
3.1.4. Optimizing Energy Efficiency and
Operational Sustainability:
ML significantly contributes to optimizing energy
efficiency and sustainability in building operations. By
integrating ML algorithms into energy management
systems, it becomes possible to dynamically adjust
heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), and
lighting based on real-time data, such as occupancy
levels, weather conditions, and sensor feedback.
These systems help reduce unnecessary energy
consumption by responding to actual building usage,
thereby aligning with circular economy principles that
emphasize minimizing resource waste throughout a
building’s operational life. For instance, by analyzing
patterns in occupancy and environmental data, ML
models can predict peak usage times and adjust
energy settings to ensure that systems are only
active when needed, which not only conserves
energy but also lowers the building‘s overall
carbon footprint (Cambridge University Press and
Assessment, 2024). This predictive approach allows
for smarter energy consumption, reducing both
costs and environmental impacts over time, which
is vital for achieving sustainable building practices
(Challa et all., 2024). Integrating such intelligent
systems into architectural design can ensure that
buildings are more energy-efficient from the start,
supporting long-term sustainability goals.
3.2. Integration of ML and CE
The integration of machine learning (ML) into the
circular economy has the potential to revolutionize
sustainable practices across industries by maximizing
resource efficiency, minimizing waste, and enhancing
product longevity. According to a study by the Ellen
MacArthur Foundation (2019), digital technologies
like ML are essential for transitioning to a circular
economy, providing data-driven insights that help
designers select materials with lower carbon
footprints and optimize products for recyclability
from the outset. Predictive maintenance algorithms,
for example, enable manufacturers to anticipate
equipment failure, which can reduce waste and
extend product lifespan—a vital approach to
preserving resources in a circular framework (Park
et al., 2021). Additionally, ML improves sorting and
recycling efficiency by using computer vision to
identify and categorize waste materials, a method
shown to increase recycling rates and resource
recovery, as demonstrated by research from the
World Economic Forum 2020. In supply chain
management, ML’s predictive capabilities offer
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
59
actionable insights to streamline processes, reduce
emissions, and promote sustainable decisionmaking.
Together, machine learning and the circular
economy foster a resilient, closed-loop system that
aligns environmental responsibility with economic
efficiency, paving the way for a more sustainable
future.
Taking design as an example, ML could be used to
improve and speed up the design and material
selection process to improve the circularity of nearly
all materials and products. ML could help material
scientists and designers develop solutions for the
30% of plastic packaging that requires fundamental
redesign and innovation, (McKinsey & Company,
Artificial Intelligence: Construction technology’s
next frontier, 2018) or engineers and architects to
optimise building design features based on circular
design principles, such as the type of connections
or architectural finishes (Ellen MacArthur 2019). In
CE, ML can also enable autonomous and remote
monitoring of manufacturing efficiency and product
end-of-life cycles (Ghoreishi and Happonen, 2020).
According to Ramadoss et al. (2018), a substantial
amount of data originates during the manufacturing,
during usage, and during disposal process of a
product, component, or material. AI can be utilized to
effectively analyze this data for further development
of these processes. Ghoreishi et al. (2020) found
that circular design tools and methods can help
businesses improve product circularity according
to artificial intelligence. Supply chains, logistics, and
asset management technologies have also seen
major changes with the increasing use of AI, IoT
concepts, 3D printing, Advanced Robotics, wearable
devices, and Augmented Reality (AR). In recent years,
there has also been an ongoing trend to combine
artificial intelligence with all aspects of CE.
3.2.1. Data-Driven Optimization with ML
A key advantage of ML in the CE space is its ability
to process vast amounts of data from various
sources, such as IoT devices, smart sensors, and
supply chain management systems (Prida, 2021). By
integrating data from different stages of the product
lifecycle, ML algorithms can accurately forecast
material flows, identify recycling opportunities,
and enhance resource recovery processes. For
example, cloud-based platforms like Microsoft
Azure and Google Vertex AI offer scalable solutions
that allow industries to deploy ML models across
global operations, thus optimizing material reuse
and minimizing waste (Pathan et al., 2023). These
platforms facilitate automated feature engineering
and model deployment, enabling companies to
streamline their sustainability efforts through datadriven
insights.
3.2.2. Real-Time Decision-Making Using Edge
Computing
In addition to cloud-based solutions, the use of
edge computing is becoming essential for real-time
optimization in circular economy applications. Edge
computing is a distributed computing paradigm that
brings computation and data storage closer to the
location where it is needed, rather than relying solely
on centralized cloud data centers. This proximity to
the „edge“ of the network reduces latency, enhances
speed, and improves the overall performance of
applications, especially those requiring real-time
data processing (Grace A. Lewis, 2019). By processing
data locally on devices, ML models can make
instant decisions in contexts such as automated
waste sorting or smart building management
systems (Pathan et al., 2023). This reduces latency
and improves the efficiency of systems that
require immediate feedback, such as identifying
contaminants in recycling streams or adjusting
adaptive facades in response to environmental
changes. The ability to react quickly to data inputs
supports the CE‘s objective of reducing waste and
optimizing resource efficiency.
Correct use of technology can boost efficient reverse
logistics & materials and goods considerations that
then gain second life and also it accelerates the
CE concept worldwide with the suitable recycling
process, which uses limited resources (Benton
et al., 2020). But for efficient reverse logistics,
talented and knowledgeable logistics operators will
be needed. Operators who know how to position
themselves correctly between manufacturers and
subcontractors (E. Salmela et al, 2009). A combination
of digitalization driven technologies and novel
business models innovation may provide significant
new opportunities towards more sustainability for
industries in terms of value creation, value capturing
and CE (R. J. Lanzafame, 2015). For example, by
using digital design processes to build one of the
configurable products, in a sustainable manner.
(Sitra, 2018) mentions that manufacturing industries
can gain tangible benefits by a digital reinvention of
the industry to move towards Circularity. However,
some technologies are known to be prone to risks
that must be considered and balanced with possible
higher rewards and benefits these technologies
offer compared to more traditional options. As an
example, one way of doing this is to do feasibility
analysis for the new technology (Happonen et al.,
2015) and compare it directly against know and well
matured traditional (golden standard) solutions.
3.2.3. Intelligent manufacturing
AI provides features such as reasoning, acting and
learning in an industrial manufacturing system
and therefore is capable to play a key role in future
manufacturing systems development efforts. With
the use of ML technology as a complement of human’s
skill which deals more effectively with complexity,
human involvement in IMS is minimized (R. Y. Zhong,
2017). According to Li (2017), the application of ML
in the product lifecycle mainly consists of “intelligent
cloud product design technology, intelligent cloud
innovation design technology, intelligent cloud
60
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Figure 2. AI development and the future state of AI techniques (World Economic Forum and A.T.Kearney, 2017).
production equipment technology, intelligent cloud
operation and management technology, intelligent
cloud simulation and experiment technology, and
intelligent cloud service guarantee technology”.
AI can utilize production optimization in
manufacturing companies. For example, machine
learning techniques can be employed to be used
in identification tasks, where the system needs to
do root cause related identifying tasks for ranking
purposes to be able to define probable root causes
of production challenges (Seebo, 2019).
3.3. Challenges
Implementing ML in support of the CE involves
tackling various technical and organizational barriers.
These challenges stem from issues related to data
management, infrastructure, skills, and company
culture, as well as regulatory hurdles.
3.3.1. Technical Challenges
Data Fragmentation and Quality Issues
High-quality data is critical for ML algorithms to
deliver accurate predictions and optimizations.
However, data relevant to CE—such as material
flows, recycling rates, and lifecycle assessments—is
often fragmented across different stakeholders and
lacks standardization (All Noman et al., 2022). For
instance, companies may collect data in silos, using
different formats and inconsistent metrics, making
it difficult to consolidate and analyse effectively
(Pathan, 2023). Additionally, much of the data on
material use and waste management is not digitized
or properly structured, limiting the capability of ML
models to process it efficiently.
Scalability of ML Models
Circular economy applications often require
sophisticated models capable of handling large
volumes of data to optimize processes like waste
sorting, resource recovery, and supply chain logistics
(pathan, 2023). However, scaling these ML models
to different industries with varying levels of digital
maturity can be challenging. For example, deploying
models for predictive maintenance in manufacturing
or optimizing the recyclability of materials
involves significant computational resources and
infrastructure investments (All Noman, 2022). The
complexity increases when real-time processing
is needed, such as in smart waste management
systems, where delays in data processing can reduce
efficiency. However, implementing AI is not easy
and requires experts for algorithm development,
preparation of training data as well as translating
the algorithm output into the meaningful results
for humans (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2019), to
train the algorithm, the availability of sufficient highquality
data is required. Poor quality outputs result
from badly engineered data, in other words, rubbish
in, rubbish out.
3.3.2. Policy Barriers
In addition to technical and organizational barriers,
policy barriers also significantly hinder the
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
61
implementation of ML solutions for the CE. These
barriers often arise from misaligned regulations, lack
of incentives, and the absence of a supportive legal
framework.
Implementing ML solutions in the CE faces significant
policy barriers that hinder widespread adoption.
One major challenge is the lack of standardized
regulations across regions, leading to fragmented
policies and unclear legal definitions for key
terms like „waste“ and „secondary raw materials“
(Geissdoerfer et al., 2020). Additionally, insufficient
incentives for data sharing, coupled with stringent
data privacy laws such as GDPR, limit the availability
of lifecycle data necessary for ML applications
(Bakker et al., 2021). Governments often prioritize
traditional waste management over innovative, MLdriven
circular solutions, and limited funding for
research and development further slows innovation
(Kirchherr et al., 2018). Extended Producer
Responsibility (EPR) policies also present obstacles,
as they lack mechanisms to encourage the use of
ML for optimizing resource recovery and recycling
while imposing complex compliance requirements
on companies (Benton & Hazell, 2020). Furthermore,
international trade barriers restrict the flow of
recycled materials, reducing the effectiveness of ML
solutions designed for global supply chains (Bocken
et al., 2020). These policy gaps and regulatory
inconsistencies pose significant challenges to the
integration of ML technologies in circular economy
initiatives.
4. Discussion
Trends and advancements in ML applications for
circular economy were identified. This review also
highlights key research gaps, such as limited largescale
implementation studies and challenges with
data accessibility. Lastly, implications for future
research and policy are discussed, underscoring
the potential for ML to transform circular economy
practices and recommending areas for further
exploration, such as the integration of ML with IoT
and blockchain technologies.
AI can help unlock circular economy opportunities
by improving design, operating business models,
and optimising infrastructure. Machine learning (ML)
can play a transformative role in product design by
enabling predictive modeling and generative design
techniques, which optimize materials, durability, and
recyclability from the outset. For instance, neural
networks can be used to simulate product lifecycles
and predict the environmental impact of various
design choices, facilitating the development of
products that are easier to reuse, repair, or recycle.
Reinforcement learning algorithms can optimize
circular business models, such as product-as-aservice
(PaaS) or reverse logistics, by continuously
learning and adjusting strategies to maximize
resource efficiency and minimize waste (Kalmykova
et al., 2018).
Despite these advancements, significant research
gaps remain. One notable gap is the limited number
of large-scale, real-world implementation studies
that evaluate the effectiveness of ML solutions in
diverse circular economy contexts. These studies
are critical for understanding the scalability
and generalizability of ML technologies across
industries, such as construction, electronics, and
textiles (Murray et al., 2017). Data accessibility and
interoperability continue to be a major challenge, as
circular economy systems require data from multiple
stakeholders, often stored in disparate formats
and systems (Geissdoerfer et al., 2020). Addressing
these challenges will require the development
of standardized data-sharing frameworks and
collaborative platforms that incentivize transparency
and data exchange among supply chain actors.
Future research should focus on the integration of
ML with emerging technologies like the Internet of
Things (IoT) and blockchain. IoT devices can provide
real-time data on resource usage, product conditions,
and waste generation, which ML algorithms can
analyze to optimize circular processes in real-time.
Blockchain technology can enhance data integrity
and traceability, making it easier to track products
and materials throughout their lifecycle and ensure
compliance with circular economy principles (Benton
& Hazell, 2020). Additionally, policymakers must play
a proactive role by creating regulatory frameworks
that support innovation, encourage data sharing,
and promote the adoption of AI-driven circular
economy solutions. By addressing these technical,
organizational, and policy barriers, ML has the
potential to significantly enhance the efficiency,
scalability, and impact of circular economy practices,
driving a transition toward more sustainable and
resilient economic systems.
5. References
All Noman et al., Annals of Emerging Technologies in
Computing (AETiC) Vol. 6, No. 2, 2022. Review Article:
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Circular
Economy: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature
Review.
Ayoola Oke, Sunday. „A Literature Review on Artificial
Intelligence.“ International Journal of Information and
Management Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 535-570, 2004.
Bakker, C. A., et al. (2021). Circular Economy Policies and
Data Sharing. Journal of Industrial Ecology.
Benton, D., & Hazell, J. (2020). Building a Circular Economy:
Barriers and Policy Solutions. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
Bocken, N. M. P., et al. (2020). Barriers to Implementing
Circular Economy in Supply Chains: An International
Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119238.
Building Research Establishment (BRE) Database, 2023.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017). New Plastics Economy:
Catalysing Action.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2019). Cities and Circular
62
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Economy for Food.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Artificial Intelligence and the
Circular Economy.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards a Circular Economy:
Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Greener
Management International, 20 (2015).
Ellen MacArthur Foundation; Drawing from Braungart &
McDonough, Cradle to Cradle (C2C).
Environmental Building Science Quarterly, 2023.
Feng, C., et al. (2020). Predictive Maintenance for Building
Components. International Journal of Building Pathology
and Adaptation, 38(1), 72-86.
Geissdoerfer, M., et al. (2020). The Role of Regulation
in Circular Economy Transitions. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 253, 119884.
Ghoreishi, Malahat, & Happonen, Ari (2020). New
Promises AI Brings into Circular Economy Accelerated
Product Design: A Review on Supporting Literature.
E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 158, 06002. DOI: 10.1051/
e3sconf/202015806002.
Gupta, Nishika (2018). „A Literature Survey on Artificial
Intelligence.“ International Journal of Engineering Research
& Technology (IJERT), Vol. 5, No. 19. Available: IJERT.
Happonen, A., & Stepanov, A. (2015). Feasible Application
Area Study for Linear Laser Cutting in Paper Making
Processes. Physics Procedia, Vol. 78, 174-181. DOI:
10.1016/j.phpro.2015.11.03061.
Happonen, A., et al. (2009). Role of Logistics Service
Provider in Supply Chain Between Manufacturer and
Subcontractor. International Symposium on Logistics (ISL
2009).
Jatin Pal Singh. How AI and Machine Learning Are
Transforming the Circular Economy. World Economic
Forum.
Kalmykova, Y., et al. (2018). Circular Economy – From
Review of Theories and Practices to Development of
Implementation Tools. Resources, Conservation &
Recycling, 135, 190–201.
Kaza, Silpa, Yao, Lisa, Bhada-Tata, Perinaz, & Van Woerden,
Frank. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid
Waste Management to 2050. Washington, DC: World Bank
Publications, 2018.
Kirchherr, J., et al. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy:
Evidence from the European Union. Ecological Economics,
150, 264–272.
Kortelainen, H., et al. (2019). From Asset Provider to
Knowledge Company: Transformation in the Digital Era.
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 333–341.
Li, B., et al. (2017). Applications of Artificial Intelligence
in Intelligent Manufacturing: A Review. Frontiers of
Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 18, 86.
DOI: 10.1631/FITEE.1601885.
Murray, A., et al. (2017). The Circular Economy: An
Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and
Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics,
140(3), 369–380.
Olivia Bartolini. No More Waste: 10 Ways to Incorporate the
Circular Economy into an Architectural Project | ArchDaily.
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How Smart,
Connected Products Are Transforming Competition.
Harvard Business Review.
Prioux, N., Ouaret, R., Hetreux, G., & Belaud, J.P. (2023).
Environmental Assessment Coupled with Machine
Learning for Circular Economy. Clean Technol. Environ.
Policy.
Ramadoss, Tamil Selvan, Alam, Hilaal, & Seeram,
Ramakrishna (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Internet
of Things Enabled Circular Economy. The International
Journal of Engineering and Science, Vol. 7, No. 9. DOI:
10.9790/1813-0709035563.
Salmela, E., & Happonen, A. (2009). Role of Logistics
Service Provider in Supply Chain Between Manufacturer
and Subcontractor. ISL 2009 Proceedings.
Sitra (2018). Circular Economy Business Models for the
Manufacturing Industry.
Stankovic, M., et al. (2017). Industry 4.0: Opportunities
Behind the Challenge.
The Manufacturer (Annual Manufacturing Report), 2020.
UN FAO (2011). Global Food Losses and Food Waste:
Extent, Causes and Prevention.
Usama Awan, et al. (2021). Artificial Intelligence for Supply
Chain Success in the Era of Data Analytics. Studies in
Computational Intelligence, Vol. 935.
Van den Berg, M. R., & Bakker, C. A. (2015). A Product Design
Framework for a Circular Economy. PLATE Conference
Proceedings.
Waughray, D., et al. (2018). Harnessing the Fourth Industrial
Revolution for the Earth. World Economic Forum.
Zhong, R. Y., et al. (2017). Intelligent Manufacturing in the
Context of Industry 4.0: A Review. Engineering, 3, 616.
Zhou, Z. H. (2021). Machine Learning. Springer Nature:
Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
63
Article
Façade Performance and Architectural Design
Sara Hemmatyar 1
1. Detmold School of Design, TH OWL, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany
Abstract
Contemporary architectural façade design elements combine both visual with operational requirements,
creating solutions which promote sustainable practices together with energy efficiency and comfortable
experiences. This paper summarizes part of the content acquired in the module MID 1040 during the Winter
Semester 2024-2025, describing façade applications regarding acoustics, solar shading systems, and thermal
performance. The paper highlights how key aspects of building physics must be combined for producing
sustainable energy-efficient buildings. The integration of multiple functions leads to better outcomes for
building users and protects the environment. Façade design becomes successful through methods which
merge functionality with sustainability while keeping aesthetics in the forefront.
Keywords: façade design, sustainability, acoustic performance, solar shading, thermal performance
1. Introduction
In contemporary architecture, façades have a
significant role in most projects. That is why the
design of façades play a significant role in the
transition from the internal space of the building to
the outer environment. Façades not only enhance the
quality of spaces for occupants to feel comfortable
and satisfied, but they also operate as a key factor
in environmental protection as well as enhancing
energy efficiency.
This article presents part of the content acquired in
the module MID 1040: Sustainability, Climate, and
Comfort, led by M.Eng. Alvaro Balderrama, Dipl.-
Ing. Manfred Starlinger, and Prof. Daniel Arztmann.
The main assignments of the course were a detailed
report of the semester in written format and a
poster that illustrated the concepts discussed. The
module covered key aspects of building physics and
sustainability such as acoustics, solar shading, and
thermal efficiency. Further topics from the course
such as moisture protection and visual quality were
left out of the scope of this summary. This paper
gathered information from some of the case studies
and workshops.
2. Acoustics in Architecture
Acoustics is an essential consideration in
architectural design, directly influencing the comfort,
functionality, and sensory experience of indoor and
outdoor spaces. Addressing aspects such as room
acoustics parameters, façade sound transmission,
and outdoor acoustic implications, architects can
create environments that enhance well-being and
meet the unique requirements of each space.
64
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Furthermore, soundscape perception is shaped by
a variety of contextual factors, making the study
of acoustic perception a multidisciplinary field that
extends beyond traditional sound management
(Aletta, Kang, & Axelsson, 2016). Contemporary
architecture requires acoustics to become a central
focus because urban noise pollution problems
continue to grow.
Façade acoustics examines sound behavior patterns
across various spaces together with the properties
of building elements. Façade design enables the
reduction of unwanted noise and can improve
comfort around the building. The rising density of
cities requires architects to find innovative ways of
combating noise pollution in order to make urban
environments habitable. The design of an optimal
façade contributes to better life quality through
sound control measures, thus acoustic performance
emerges as a fundamental element for creating
sustainable urban environments.
2.1. Acoustic Challenges and Solutions
in Urban Design
In urban areas, the predominant sounds are
from technology and people, including traffic,
construction, and industrial work. Urban noise
pollution is a growing concern in modern cities.
It significantly impacts residents‘ well-being and
requires innovative noise mapping and mitigation
strategies (Aletta et al.,2018). Noise pollution can
have dangerous effects on people’s health, including
stress, impairing sleep, and harming cognitive
functions. To cope with these effects, architects and
urban planners use noise mapping, a technique that
estimates the sound levels in defined regions. Also,
Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) such as green walls,
rooftop gardens, and ponds can also be utilized
to restore the city‘s soundscape and mitigate the
amount of urban noise. These efforts lead to better
mental health, improved cognition, and increased
sustainability for urban areas.
2.2. Acoustic Performance in Façades
Façades also function as sound barriers regulating
the transmission of sound from outside to indoor
environments. Airborne sound insulation may be
among the most crucial properties of façade acoustics
that can exclude sound from passing through into
buildings. In terms of the Sound Reduction (Rw),
airborne sound insulation expresses how efficiently
a material can obstruct the transmission of sound in
decibels (dB). The performance of a façade depends
on material selection, glazing, composite panels, and
insulation layers that are usually used to improve
sound insulation. By optimizing the mass, density,
and cavity design of the façade, architects can
maximize acoustic comfort for buildings. However,
outdoor considerations are also important since
reflective façades might improve indoor conditions
but harm the exterior. One example is a façade
system designed to absorb urban noise. Figure 2
shows a system that uses architectural ceramics
to reduce noise pollution effectively. The project
demonstrates how sustainable and innovative
façade designs can enhance urban living conditions.
It also shows how acoustic performance can be
integrated with broader sustainability goals. This
example illustrates the practical ways façades can
address urban noise challenges.
Figure 1. A noise map of Bochum, Germany. Image:
HS Gesundheit.
Figure 2. Sound absorbing façade material. Image:
Bartlett School of Architecture.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
65
Thoughtful design elements, such as using soundabsorbing
materials, geometric façade design,
and new noise-control technology, can contribute
significantly to urban acoustic comfort. Future
façade design must reconcile acoustic performance
with sustainability principles so that buildings not
only reduce noise pollution but also make the city a
more livable and efficient place.
Figure 5. Comparison of sound levels and perceived
loudness. Image by the author.
Figure 3. Rabel Aluminium Systems. Image:
ArchDaily.
2.3. Case Study: Agentur für Arbeit,
Paderborn
Technological sounds resulting from traffic and trains
dominate the environment whereas natural sounds
are scarce in the area. Neighborhoods with lower
noise levels present better perception than regions
with higher background sounds.
To analyze acoustic performance in real life, a study
was conducted on the Agentur für Arbeit office
building. Research on soundscape perception
through on-site surveys demonstrated that urban
noise pollution is substantial due to the location
being close to active transportation and the train
station.
Noise maps were created with the online tool
dBmap. The six points of measurement show the
sound exposure of the building with noise levels that
decrease as distance increases from these sources.
Figure 6. Sound source identification. Image by the
author.
Figure 4. Noise map of the building and 6 chosen
points with specific noise level. Image by the author.
High buildings and railway structures in the area
have weak sound-absorbing abilities that increase
noise reflection until it reaches maximum intensity
in proximity to transportation facilities.
3. Solar Energy in Architecture
Solar power is one of the most abundant and
renewable sources of energy, and it can reduce
the use of fossil fuels as well as carbon emissions.
Solar power directly influences building energy
efficiency by impacting heating, cooling, and
electricity production. In architecture, effective
incorporation of solar energy systems raises the
level of thermal comfort because artificial heating
and cooling requirements are reduced. Façades
are also significant in achieving maximum solar
gain through control of the amount of sunlight
penetrating a building. Solar radiation and shading
are vital parameters to consider in order to balance
66
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
occupant comfort and energy efficiency.
3.1. Solar Geometry and Radiation
The amount of solar energy incident on a building
depends on its orientation, location, and geometry.
Solar angles such as altitude, azimuth, and
declination influence the intensity and duration of
sun exposure on a façade. Solar radiation includes
ultraviolet, visible, and infrared light, all of which
impact thermal performance and energy efficiency.
Cloud cover, season, and building form are influences
on the extent of solar energy absorbed, reflected, or
transmitted by surfaces. Understanding these helps
architects to design buildings that enable maximum
daylight with a minimum of unwanted heat gain,
contributing to comfort and sustainability.
Figure 8. Shading – Passive design strategies. Image:
National Energy Efficiency Building Centre (n.d.).
3.3. Solar Gains and Energy Efficiency
Figure 7. Solar radiation. Image: Penn State College
of Earth and Mineral Sciences (n.d.).
3.2. Solar Shading and Its Role in
Building Design
Shading systems are important to modulate solar
heat gain, energy conservation, and indoor climate
conditions. Different shading devices—external
shading devices (overhangs, louvers), internal
shading (blinds, curtains), and dynamic shading
(adjustable systems)—are implemented to manage
sunlight penetration. The effectiveness of shading
is quantified by utilizing the reduction factor (FC)
and g-value, which allows façades to offer sufficient
daylight without excess heat. Carefully designed
shading systems lower cooling loads in the summer
but also allow for passive solar heating in winter,
producing energy-efficient and climate-sensitive
buildings.
Solar energy contributes significantly to the thermal
performance of a building, and solar gains are
quantified as the amount of heat attained through
windows and façades. In cold climates, passive solar
heating design has the potential to reduce heating
loads by allowing sunlight to heat the indoor space
naturally. However, in tropical climates, excessive
solar gains lead to overheating and excessive cooling
loads. Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (g-value) quantifies
the quantity of solar radiation admitted through
glazing into a building. Solar gains are managed by
optimizing solar orientation, shading devices, and
glazing materials to attain higher energy efficiency.
3.4. Photovoltaic Systems
Photovoltaic (PV) devices convert sunlight to
electricity using semiconductor materials. PV
systems come primarily in two types: grid-connection
systems that are connected to the power system
and allow return of excess electricity, and standalone
systems independent with batteries that store
energy. Efficiency of the PV panel will depend on
the module type (monocrystalline, polycrystalline,
thin-film), the temperature, and exposure to
sunshine. Utilizing PV panels to building façades and
rooftops can enhance the energy self-supply while
constraining the reliance on traditional electricity
suppliers, hence becoming one of the essential
building sustainability components.
Figure 9. How do solar panels work? Image: SanTan
Solar (n.d.).
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
67
3.5. Integrating Solar and PV Systems
in Architecture
Photovoltaic panel and solar energy system
integration in building design is of utmost significance
in an attempt to create energy-efficient architecture
and reduce the environmental footprint. Through
the integration of passive solar design, shading
strategies, and PV technology, buildings can optimize
electricity generation and daylighting. Designs of
the future have to be focused on smart shading
technology, enhanced PV materials, and adaptive
façades to construct adaptive climate and efficient
energy buildings. As cities grow, the use of solarpowered
technologies will be central to improving
sustainability, resilience, and reducing carbon
footprints in the built environment.
materials, i.e., walls, floors, and windows, thus making
insulation an essential element in minimizing thermal
loss. Convection arises when heat is transferred via
the migration of air, which may either occur naturally
due to ventilation or artificially using HVAC systems.
Radiation is the transfer of heat by electromagnetic
waves, including solar radiation that impinges on
exterior surfaces and enters interior spaces. With a
clear understanding of these processes, architects
and engineers can create façades that reduce
unwanted heat transfer while optimizing thermal
comfort and energy efficiency.
4. Thermal Energy in Architecture
Thermal energy is a fundamental aspect of building
physics, which emerges from particle kinetic activity
for indoor environment control to achieve comfort
while influencing energy costs. Temperature
measurements help building enclosure managers
achieve better comfort while sustaining green
protocols along with reduced heating or cooling
requirements. Renewable energy integration during
building development establishes enhanced thermal
comfort while raising energy performance without
creating substantial carbon emissions. Different
physiological factors including climate conditions and
individual behavior patterns and dressing choices
determine how people experience thermal comfort.
The indoor climate standards establish appropriate
environmental parameters that should satisfy 80%
of building inhabitants by maintaining temperatures
between 20-22°C and relative humidity between
35-70%. Natural ventilation combined with strategic
windows produces benefits for building thermal
comfort and energy efficiency.
Figure 11. Wall section. Image: Terraco (n.d.).
4.2. U-Value and Its Role in Thermal
Insulation
The U-value is a critical parameter for determining
the ability of building materials to transfer
heat; lower U-values indicate better insulation
performance. Materials with low U-values, such as
aerated concrete, mineral wool, and double-glazed
windows, reduce heat transfer considerably, thus
keeping indoor spaces warmer in winter and cooler
in summer. By selecting materials with low thermal
conductivity, architects can enhance the energy
efficiency of a building and its responsiveness to
changing climatic conditions. Lowering the U-value
of a building envelope contributes to a decrease
in heating and cooling expenses, lowers carbon
emissions, and provides a uniform indoor thermal
climate.
4.3. Enhancing Thermal Performance
Figure 10. Building thermal comfort analysis. Image:
Ecologikol (n.d.).
4.1. Heat Transfer Mechanisms in
Buildings
There are three fundamental mechanisms through
which heat transfer within buildings is achieved:
conduction, convection, and radiation. Conduction
refers to the transfer of thermal energy via solid
To improve thermal efficiency, designers can
integrate insulation, climate-responsive materials,
and passive solar strategies into façade design. A welldesigned
thermal façade not only reduces heating
and cooling costs but also enhances occupant
well-being by maintaining a comfortable indoor
climate. Sustainable design approaches should
focus on maximizing thermal insulation, managing
solar gains, and selecting energy-efficient building
materials. Future architectural innovations will rely
on smart façades, adaptive insulation technologies,
and energy-efficient glazing to create resilient, low-
68
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
carbon, and thermally efficient buildings that align
with global sustainability goals.
4.4. Case Study: U-value Calculation of
Building #2
Figure 12. Building #2 of TH OWL in Detmold.
Figure 13. Assumption of façade units.
A calculation of the nominal value of the thermal
transmittance Ucw for curtain walls was conducted
per EN ISO 12631: 2017, using an excel table provided
by the instructor, as well as using the Building Physics
Solver online tool.
Landscape and Urban Planning. 149. 65–74. 10.1016/j.
landurbplan.2016.02.001.
Aletta, F., Oberman, T., & Kang, J. (2018). Associations
between Positive Health-Related Effects and Soundscapes
Perceptual Constructs: A Systematic Review. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
15(11), 2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112392
Bartlett School of Architecture investigate. How do we
design our way out of urban noise pollution? Retrieved
[02.03.2025], from https://www.materialsource.co.uk/
how-do-we-design-our-way-out-of-urban-noise-pollutionbartlett-school-of-architecture-investigate/
Ecologikol. (n.d.). Building thermal comfort analysis.
LinkedIn. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/
building-thermal-comfort-analysis-ecologikol/
HS Gesundheit. „Stakeholders Engagement in Noise
Action Planning Mediated by OGITO: An Open Geo-Spatial
Interactive Tool“. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.
net/figure/A-noise-map-of-Bochum-Germany-Source-HS-
Gesundheit_fig1_370822692
National Energy Efficiency Building Centre. (n.d.). Shading
– Passive design strategies. NZEB Knowledge Centre.
Retrieved from https://nzeb.in/knowledge-centre/passivedesign/shading/
Pennsylvania State University. (n.d.). Energy from the sun:
Solar radiation. Penn State College of Earth and Mineral
Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.e-education.psu.
edu/meteo300/node/683
Rabel Aluminium Systems. (n.d.). Façade vertical folding
shading system - Rabel 14200. ArchDaily. Retrieved from
https://www.archdaily.com/catalog/us/products/26915/
façade-vertical-folding-shading-system-rabel-14200-
rabel-aluminium-systems
SanTan Solar. (n.d.). How do solar panels work? Retrieved
from https://www.santansolar.com/how-do-solar-panelswork/
Terraco. (n.d.). What is EIFS/ETICS? Retrieved from https://
www.terraco.com/tur/what-is-eifs-etics/
5. Conclusion
In the coming years, façade design will depend
more on efficient materials, and likely on innovative
technology such as dynamic shading systems,
and high-efficiency photovoltaics. As future cities
continue to develop, the use of environmentresponsive
and performance-driven façade
solutions will remain essential to the development of
sustainable architecture. Innovative and integrated
design solutions can allow architects and engineers
to develop façades that are in balance with their
environment and creating resilient cities.
6. References
Aletta, Francesco & Kang, Jian & Axelsson, Östen.
(2016). Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual
framework for developing predictive soundscape models.
ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
69
4. MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
70 ARTICLES
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
MASTER OF INTEGRATED DESIGN (MID)
DESIGN CONCEPTS
MID 1040: Sustainability, Climate and Comfort
MID Design Concepts
Lecturers: Alvaro Balderrama, Manfred Starlinger, Prof. Daniel Arztmann
The module MID 1040 (formerly MID S4) focuses
on providing an understanding of key principles
related to façade performance in terms of building
physics, as well as other aspects of sustainable
design, such as energy efficiency and human
comfort.
The semester was structured into six main parts:
(1) acoustic performance, (2) solar shading, (3)
energy efficiency, (4) thermal performance, (5)
moisture and hygiene, and (6) visual quality. To
address these topics, a series of lectures and
workshops were planned throughout the semester
to give students the theoretical background along
with hands-on experience using assessment tools,
calculation methods, and site visits.
Assignment 2: Poster Presentation
For the final presentation on January 29, 2025, each
student prepared two highly illustrative posters in
the specified format (vertical DIN A3). Students
were free to design the posters to support their
presentations; therefore, the use of an infographic
style was recommended. The posters were
expected to visually convey the main concepts
learned throughout the semester, accompanied
by short texts summarizing each of the six topics.
The 15 double-page posters are presented ahead.
Assignment 1: Semester Report
Throughout the semester, students were expected
to document their work by creating a written
report, with one chapter dedicated to each of the
main topics covered in the course. By the end of the
semester, they were to compile a comprehensive
document that could serve as a guide for future
projects. The final report followed the specified
format (vertical DIN A4, Arial 11 for body text, single
spacing), and included the following sections:
Cover Page, Summary, Introduction, Acoustic
Performance, Solar Shading, Energy Efficiency,
Thermal Performance, Moisture and Hygiene,
Visual Quality, and Discussion. The report was
submitted in digital format via upload to the Ilias
platform by January 24, 2025.
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.3
71
Energy Efficiency in Building Design (PV-panels): Key Steps
• Energy demands of consumers and energy losses.
• Seasonality, panel positioning, geographical location, budget, roof size, orientation, and
inclination.
• Series, parallel, or hybrid configurations, solar panel type based on energy needs and shading
factors.
• Appropriate inverter based on system size and panel output. Central inverters or microinverters.
• Potential shading risks
• Manufacturing defects (e.g., microcracks, delamination).
• Grounding and surge protection devices.
Solar Analysis in Building Design: Key Steps
• The angle of declination, day length and latitude through the year, solar
altitude and azimuth angles, and solar intensity.
• Reflection, absorptance, and transmittance of solar radiation, secondary heat
delivery (the heat generated by absorbed radiation transferred to the interior).
• Vertical and horizontal shadow angles (VSA and HSA), Shading Coefficient
(SC), external shading, internal shading, dynamic shading systems or
photochromic glass.
• G-values.
• DIN EN ISO 52022, DIN 4108-2.
Moisture in Building Design: Key Steps
• Internal moisture sources and external moisture sources.
• Indoor air does not cool to the dew point.
• Properly insulate thermal bridges.
• Uniform heating across the building.
• Unobstructed air circulation, especially on exterior wall surfaces.
• Temperature factor (f Rsi ) to verify the temperature difference between surfaces and air.
• Interior conditions of +20°C and 50% relative humidity. Exterior conditions of -5°C and
80% relative humidity.
• DIN 4108-2, the German Energy Saving Ordinance (EnEV).
Anastasiia Krasnikova
72
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Acoustic Analysis in Building Design:
Key Steps
• Project requirements and sound sources (e.g.,
traffic, machinery, environmental).
• Façade materials based – reflection, absorption,
and transmission coefficients.
• Tools – Grasshopper and Pachyderm Acoustics
for acoustic simulations.
• EN ISO 10140-2, DIN 4109-1:2018, ISO 12913.
The visual quality in
Building Design: Key
Steps
• Objective and subjective
preferences.
• Analysis of design elements
like symmetry, proportion,
and materials.
Thermal Efficiency in Building Design: Key Steps
• Thermal comfort for occupants, air temperature, surface temperature, humidity, and air velocity, types of
heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. Minimize heat loss.
• U-value for the window frame, glazing, panels, and spacers (linear thermal transmittance).
• Software tools for thermal simulations - Schücal, Therm, Flixo.
• DIN EN ISO 10077-1/2 and DIN EN ISO 12631.
Refer to the report or the page attached to the poster for all image sources.
Auth. Krasnikova Anastasiia
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
73
Aashish Singh
74
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
75
MID 1040 Sustainability, Climate and Comfort
The way people perceive,
experience, and react to the
entire spectrum of sounds in a
location at a specific moment
is referred to as the
"soundscape."An emerging
field called "soundscape
studies" aims to take a
listener-centered approach to
the problem of urban acoustic
environments. Context desired
rather than unwanted sounds,
and personal preference over
discomfort are the main points
of emphasis for the
soundscape approach.
The decibel (dB) is a
relative unit of
measurement, widely
used in acoustics. The
dB is a logarithmic ratio
between the measured
level and a reference
(threshold) level of 0 dB.
Various dB-level
measurement apps
have been developed.
Instruments that are
lab-calibrated can be
used to measure the
exact dB levels of any
surroundings.
ACOUSTIC ENHANCEMENTS:
SOUND REDUCTION TECHNIQUES
PPPPPP HHHHHH PPPPPPPP UUU
Bishal Sunar
76
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
The term 'thermal performance' generally relates to the efficiency
with which something retains or prevents the passage of heat.
Various factors are considered to measure the thermal
performance of the building. They can be listed as follows
The sense of comfort or
well-being of a person
contributes significantly to the
person’s health and productivity.
Thermal comfort is subjective,
which means that not everyone
will be equally comfortable
under the same conditions.
PLANNING AND SIZING OF GRID-TIED PV SYSTEMS
Many common moisture problems can be traced to poor decisions
in design, construction, or maintenance.Moisture control consists
of:
Preventing water intrusion and condensation
Limiting the areas of a building that are routinely wet and drying
them.
EXAMPLES OF COLD BRIDGES
COMMON CAUSES OF COLD BRIDGES
• High Thermal Conductivity Materials
• Structural Elements
• Inadequate Insulation
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
77
Erik Karimov
78
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
79
M I D 1 0 4 0 : S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y , C L I M A T E A N D C O M F O R T
E S R A A A H M E D
PAST
B U I L D I N G P H Y S I C S
Hotter air is
expelled
through the
upper slats
Reflected
Direct
solar Rays
Air flow
geometric tile patterns and
carved calligraphy, which
diffuse sound and reduce
echoes. Their textured
surfaces break up sound
waves, improving speech
clarity in large prayer halls.
Thatched roofs with deep
overhangs in African
architecture provided
natural shade, reduced
heat gain, and kept
interiors cool, showcasing
sustainable design suited
to hot climates.
S O L A R S H A D I N G
The Mashrabiya
Provides shade by
blocking direct sunlight
while allowing
ventilation and filtered
light into interiors.The
Alhambra Palace in
Spain
Hot Air at
the Top
Cool Air at
the bottom
High Domes and Ceilings
Mosques often feature
large central domes that
amplify and evenly
distribute sound
throughout the prayer
hall. The dome design
reduces echo while
ensuring that the imam's
voice reaches the
congregation clearly.
süleymaniye Mosque in
Istanbul
A C O U S T I C S
Heavy masonry walls
were an effective
traditional method for
soundproofing buildings.
These thick stone walls
provided natural
insulation, reducing the
transmission of external
noise into the interior
spaces.
V I S U A L Q U A L I T Y
Visual quality in buildings was
achieved through craftsmanship,
natural materials, symmetry, and
thoughtful design, creating
harmonious and meaningful
spaces that blend with the
environment.
T H E R M A L
P E R F O R M A N C E
Al Malgaf encourages
natural airflow by creating a
shaded space with openings
that allow cool air to circulate
through the building
The wooden or palm-frond
construction of Al Malgaf
absorbs and disperses heat
gradually. It acts as a
thermal barrier, preventing
excessive heat from entering
the building.
M O I S T U R E A N D
H Y G I E N E
Natural ventilation was
achieved by opening
windows, which frequently
led to drafts and limited the
ability to effectively manage
moisture, impacting indoor
air quality and hygiene.
Traditional buildings used
thick walls made from
mudbrick, stone, or clay to
act as a physical barrier,
slowing down moisture from
entering indoor spaces.
E N E R G Y
E F F I C I E N C Y
In traditional Arabian architecture,
energy efficiency was achieved
through the use of courtyards,
green plants, and water features.
These elements provided natural
cooling, shading, and ventilation,
reducing heat gain and stabilizing
indoor temperatures. This passive
approach minimized energy
consumption, creating a sustainable
and comfortable living environment
without relying on external energy
sources.
Esraa Ahmed
80
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Acoustics
Sound-absorbing materials
(eco-friendly panels, wood).
Glass facades & green walls
reduce echo and city noise.
M I D 1 0 4 0 : S u s t a i n a b i l i t y , C l i m a t e a n d C o m f o r t
E s r a a A h m e d
PRESENT
S U S T A I N A B L E A R C H I T E C T U R E
Location:
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Awards:
BREEAM Outstanding (98.36%),
LEED Platinum
World Green Building Council Award
Net-Positive Energy:
Produces more energy
than it consumes
The Edge, Amsterdam
Solar Shading
Automated shading system &
triple-glazed windows adjust
based on sun position.
Building orientation optimized
for passive solar control.
Solar heat
reflected out
Low E coating
thermal insolation
Winter warmth
reflected back inside
Natural light
passes through
Thermal Performance
underground thermal storage
Geothermal heating & cooling system
Automated ventilation & thermal mass
concrete flooring
Energy Efficiency
Solar panels covering facade & rooftop
→ generates more power than needed.
AI-controlled smart LED lighting &
energy monitoring.
Thermal mass
concrete flooring
Visual Quality
Glass facade for natural daylight
(reduces artificial lighting need).
Biophilic design (green walls,
open spaces for well-being).
130 m
Moisture and Hygiene
Rainwater harvesting for toilets &
irrigation.
CO₂-controlled air filtration system
Sustainable Development Goals
1. Clean Energy (SDG 7): 100% renewable
power.
2. Innovation (SDG 9): IoT sensors
optimize efficiency.
3. Sustainable Cities (SDG 11):
BREEAM-certified, water-saving
systems.
4. Responsible Consumption (SDG 12):
Eco-friendly materials.
5. Climate Action (SDG 13): Smart
shading & thermal mass regulate
temperature
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
81
Kavyashree Govil
82
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
83
Mansi Aggarwal
84
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
85
AUDITORY SCALE
The human auditory range
spans from 20 Hz to 20,000
Hz, covering frequencies
that the average ear can
perceive. Below 20 Hz lies
infrasound, which is more
often felt than heard, while
frequencies above 20 kHz
are classified as ultrasound.
Ultrasound is generally
inaudible to humans but is
used by certain animals for
communication and
navigation
SITE CONDITIONS
The project is located in the heart of Beirut, few
meters away from the coastal line and the busiest
highway connecting the north part of the Lebanese
Capital to its southern part.
PROPOSED TRIPLE GLAZING COMPOSITION
MID1040 Sustainability, Climate and Comfort - WinSe 24-25
Prepared by: Marie Al Helou 20135939
Supervised by: Alvaro Balderrama, M.Eng., Dipl.-Arch., LEED
CLIMATE & COMFORT
In facade design, climate
and comfort play a vital
role in creating indoor
environments that are
both pleasant and
energy-efficient. A wellthought-out
design takes
into account thermal
comfort, natural lighting,
acoustic performance,
and responsiveness to
occupants' needs, all
while prioritizing energy
SOUND REFLECTION ON GLASS
SURFACES
When sound waves strike a glass surface,
they are reflected back. The extent of this
reflection is influenced by factors such as
the angle of incidence, the thickness of the
glass, and the presence of coatings.
Smooth glass surfaces, in particular, tend to
reflect more sound, thereby increasing noise
levels in the surrounding environment.
FAÇADE PHOTOS AFTER INSTALLATION
VEGETATION
The vegetation surrounding the building
acts as an acoustic buffer, reducing noise
levels while allowing fresh air to flow into
the proposed structure. Additionally, it
influences and alters the microclimate
around the building
FRONT FAÇADE ELEVATION
Marie Al Helou
86
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
VENTILATION:
In summer, strategically
positioned vents allow warm air
to rise and escape, preventing
overheating, while operable
windows regulate cool air flow
to reduce heat. In winter, vents
help direct the upward flow of
warm air, promoting natural
ventilation and maintaining a
comfortable
indoor
environment. Opening operable
windows further enhances fresh
air circulation, improving air
quality and reducing the need
for mechanical systems.
SHADING
Corten steel fins are integrated into the
curtain wall system, both vertically and
horizontally, serving as shading elements to
enhance comfort for the building's occupants
behind the glazed façade.
THERMAL PERFORMANCE
The U-Value and Solar Shading
Coefficient (SC) must comply with
EN673 and must not exceed
U-value 2.0 W/m2.K
SC : 0.4
External Climate Characteristics:
• Summer Time Dry Bulb: 35°C
• Winter Time Dry Bulb: 5.6°C
• Summer Time Wet Bulb: 26.7°C
• Summer time Relative Humidity: 80%
Internal Climate Characteristics:
• Summer Time Dry Bulb: 23.8°C
• Winter Time Dry Bulb: 21.1°C
• Summer time Relative Humidity: 50%
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
are political objectives established by the
United Nations to promote sustainable
development on a global scale. Comprised of
17 goals, they address the three core
dimensions of sustainability: social,
environmental, and economic. These goals
are designed to be achieved by all nations,
both in the Global North and Global South,
by 2030. The SDGs are interconnected and
indivisible, emphasizing their mutual
dependence for comprehensive progress.
Bibliography
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/sound/rm47-1-
introduction.htm
https://www.hollyland.com/blog/tips/what-is-db
www.ibecegroup.com
UN Sustainable Development Goals
https://www.alamy.de/larmbelastigung-urban-noisethemen-und-konzepte-wort-cloud-abbildung-wortcollage-konzept-image265165649.html
https://www.glassonweb.com/article/industrializationand-thermal-performance-new-unitized-water-flowglazing-facade
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
87
SOLAR SHADING
Solar shading devices are crucial components in building
design for improving thermal comfort and energy efficiency.
MID 1040 : SUSTAINABILITY, CLIMATE AND COMFORT
WINTER SEMESTER | 2024-2025 | NITESH SHRESTHA
ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE
Acoustic performance of facades refers to their ability to
reduce sound transmission from the exterior to the interior or
from interior to interior of a building, thereby enhancing indoor
acoustic comfort.
Fig : Different types of shading devices.
SOLAR GEOMETRY
Solar geometry refers to the position and movement of the
sun relative to a specific location on Earth.Key component are
1. Solar Altitude Angle
2. Solar Azimuth Angle
Fig : Transmittance of sound
COMPOSITION OF WALL FOR BETTER ACOUSTIC
SOLAR CHART DIAGRAM
A solar diagram is a graphical representation of the sun's
position in the sky throughout the year for a specific location.
AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL
Fig: Wall Section showing
The totality of all sounds within the room when the room is
unoccupied.
URBAN SOUNDSCAPE
Fig: Noise coming in Room
Urban soundscape refers to the acoustic environment of a city
or urban area as perceived and experienced by people in
context, including both natural and human-made sounds.
INTERACTION OF SUN WITH BUILDING ENVELOPE
Reduction factor F
0.1 < F
C < 0.4
Fig: Solar chart Diagram
Shading Coefficient S
C = g window / g 4mm float
Total energy transmission
value / SHGC
total ~ g window * F C
Fig: Soundscape of a lively urban square
Nitesh Shrestha
88
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Energy efficiency refers to the ability of a building's exterior
envelope to minimize energy consumption while maintaining
indoor comfort.
1. BIPV CELL
BIPV refers to photovoltaic modules integrated directly into
the building envelope (e.g., roofs, façades, skylights), serving
dual functions as structural components and power
generators.
FACADE THERMAL PERFORMANCE
Façade thermal performance is a critical aspect of building
design that significantly impacts energy efficiency, occupant
comfort, and overall sustainability.
Fig : Thermal Energy
HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U-VALUE)
The U-value describes the heat flow (in watts) through one m²
of a structure in one hour, divided by the difference in
temperature in K across the structure. It is expressed in watts
per square meter kelvin [W/m²K].
Fig : Composition of BIPV
2. DAYLIGHTING
Day lighting is the use of natural light in the interior of a
building and this element tends to minimize the use of artificial
light. It not only improves visual comfort but also has
advantages in energy consumption and persons using the
buildings.
HEAT TRANSFER
Heat transfer in buildings occurs through three main
mechanisms: conduction, convection, and radiation.
Fig : Daylighting
Fig : Heat Transfer in building and window
Fig : Adjustable Shading Devices
Fig : Thermally Broken window
Fig : NonThermally Broken
window
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
89
“Sustainability,
Climate and Comfort”
Acoustic
Lecturer: Alvaro Balderrama
Author : Sara Hemmatyar
Winter semester 2024-2025
Acoustic performance plays a vital role in ensuring comfort and functionality within a building.
Doors and Windows
Doors and windows are critical for
soundproofing.High-performance
acoustic doors and double or triple-glazed
windows with proper seals
block noise leakage effectively.
Insulation Layer
The insulation material within the walls
provides excellent sound absorption, reducing
airborne noise and preventing it
from traveling between rooms or from
outside to inside.
Floor Assembly
The wooden beams in the floor
structure allow for the integration
of acoustic underlays or resilient
layers, minimizing both impact
and structural noise.
Wall Design
Double-layered walls with integrated
insulation serve as barriers
that dampen sound vibrations
and enhance acoustic comfort
within spaces.
Mineral Wool
Reduction:
Approximately 25-
35 dB, depending on
thickness and density.
Materials which helps sound reduction
Acoustic Solid-Core Door:
specifically for soundproofing,Achieves
STC 35–40,
effectively blocking louder
sounds like shouting or music
Double glazing window with
Acoustic Laminated Glass:
reduce heavy traffic noise
(80 dB) to around 35 dB
indoors, providing excellent
comfort.
Solar Panels
SHADING PANELS
Solar panels and shading panels are a sustainable energy solution for residential buildings,
contributing to energy efficiency and environmental responsibility.
Monocrystalline Panels
&
2.1 m
1 m
Capable of reducing
electricity bills by
60%–80%
south-facing
Efficiency
15%–22%
A typical residential solar panel
system annually generates approximately
4,000–5,000 kWh
30°–45° roof slope in the
northern hemisphere
Allow controlled sunlight
to entr.
Aluminium
Wood
Minimize overheating in
summer
Adjustable
Reduce energy demand
for air conditioning up to
30%
It could be installd everywhere in the
house with specific consideration for
each part
Sara Hemmatyar
90
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
“Sustainability,
Climate and Comfort”
Lecturer: Alvaro Balderrama
Author : Sara Hemmatyar
Winter semester 2024-2025
Thermal Performanace
Heat Protection
Heat Transmission
Use of external
shading
High-performance insulation
materials
Properly sealed windows and doors to minimize air
leakage.
Low-E glazing to reflect solar radiation while maintaining
daylight.
Walls, roofs, and floors
with low U-values
Use of multi-layered construction with
thermal insulation layers.
Double or triple-glazed windows to reduce
heat transfer.
Airtight construction to prevent convective heat
loss.
Long wave
lenght of
sun
Visible
light
Exterior
Radient heat
Interior
Cold Bridges
Moisture Protection
Detailed design around
windows, doors, and
balconies to prevent
thermal bridging.
Insulation continuity to avoid
gaps at junctions (e.g., between
walls and roofs).
Use of vapor barriers to control
moisture movement.
Proper drainage systems to prevent
water accumulation around
the foundation.
Materials with high permeability
for exterior walls to allow moisture
escape.
Regular maintenance of sealing
around windows and doors to
prevent leaks.
Continiuty of insulation and
Fill voids
Thermal break materials in structural elements.
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
91
SOUND SCAPE
a combination of all the sounds perceived in an
environment ,
INDOOR SOUND SCAPE.
characterized by a combination of sounds
from both internal and external
sources,
RADAR PLOT
Sustainability ,Climate and Comfort
FACADE ACOUSTICS
concerns the ways in which buildings can control sound for
comfort and the well- being of occupants. It encompasses
discussion on ambient acoustics, noise control strategies, and the
betterment of urban soundscapes by means of architecture.
Source: Spatial aspects in urban soundscapes: Binaural
parameters application in the study of soundscapes
from Bogotá-Colombia and Brasília-Brazil
SOUND ABSORPTION BY FACADES
the ability of materials to transform sound energy
into a tiny amount of heat.
Different façade materials have varying
absorption coefficients, which measure their ability to
absorb sound
https://yunchuliang.com/City-
Soundscapes
REVERBATION TIME
The reverberation time T60 measures the time taken for the
sound pressure level to decay by 60 dB when a sound stops.
R=L1−L2+10log(S/A)
SOUND INSULATION
• Wall insulation/density
• Cavities/double walls •
Acoustic glazing •
WEIGHTED SOUND REDUCTION INDEX (Rw) Acoustic laminates •
an acoustic rating used to measure and indicate the effectiveness of Acoustic sashes
a soundproofing material, wall, or system
ACOUSTICS AND SOUNDSCAPE IN THE SDGs
ACOUSTICS IN ARCHITECTURE
Vegetated façades can decrease sound levels
Noise map for a densely populated city
Source :MID - Sustainability, Climate and Comfort –
Alvaro Balderrama, 2024
Wall Sound Insulation Diagram
FAÇADE'S IMPACT ON INDOOR Source: https://www.ikoustic.co.uk/science-soundproofing
SOUND PERCEPTION AND QUALITY
Vegetated façades can decrease sound levels A building's exterior has a big impact on
Source:Boston Society for Architecture
indoor sound quality and perception. It acts as
a partition between the inner space and outside
sounds. Important elements consist of:
• Sound Insulation: By reducing outside noise,
materials like insulated walls and doubleglazed
windows enhance indoor comfort.
porous façades absorbing sound,
especially high frequencies
source:Mavro International
ENERGY
emphasizes the potential of renewable energy and solar
technologies in meeting energy demands sustainably.There are
two types of energy mainly heat and work .
RENEWABLE ENERGY
• Reflection and Diffusion: The facade's
materials and design can have an impact on
how sound enters the building and is reflected
or absorbed, which can alter reverberation and
echo.
• Ventilation: Noise may enter through
openings. acoustic windows also aid in sound
reduction.
• Effect on Perception: By lowering outside
noise, a well-insulated facade improves inside
comfort, lowers stress levels, and improves
speech clarity.
Classification of methods for solar energy utilization
source:
Acoustical Evaluations of a Double Skin Façade as a Noise Barrier
of a Naturally-Ventilated Facade
Acoustic glazing
source:https://www.prestonglassfix.co.uk
Interspatial Acoustics
• Environmental Acoustics
• Façade Acoustics
• Room Acoustics
• Mechanical Acoustics
source:https://building-acoustics.net/environmental-acoustics/
SOFTWARE
TOOLS
SCHÜCAL
TZ EXCEL TOOL
BP SOLVER
(BUILDING
PHYSICS
SOLVER)
APPLICATION IN SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS
1.Paraboloid concentrating collector
2Cylindrical parabolic concentrating collector
3..Flat-plate collector
4.Solar air heater
5.Solar water heater
1.Paraboloid concentrating collector
Source:Environmental Science and Pollution Research
3.Flat-plate collector
Source: Experimental investigation on a flat plate solar collector using Al2O3
FAÇADE VISUAL QUALITY
he façade is an important aspect in determining a building's aesthetic identity and influences the
overall visual appeal of urban surroundings. A well-designed façade contributes to the development of
human-centered cities, which improve the quality of life for both residents and visitors
4.Solar air heater
Cylindrical parabolic concentrating collector
Source:Parabolic trough solar collectors: A general overview of
technology, industrial applications, energy market, modeling, and
standards.
AUTHOR :SYLIVIA KANYORA
GSPublisherVersion 0.0.100.100
Source:Multi-criteria design methods in façade engineering: State-of-the-art and future trends
Sylivia Kanyora
92
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Source: https://nzeb.in/knowledgecentre/passive-design/shading//
Solar angles
Source :solar radiation simulation
device for investigation of thermal and
photovoltaic cells
The solar direction of a given building facade will determine
the design of efficient shading devices. For instance, when
sun angles are strong in the summer, simple fixed overhangs
work wonders in shading windows facing south.
Nevertheless, during the summer's periods of greatest heat
uptake, the same horizontal device is useless at keeping the
low afternoon sun from reaching west-facing windows.
Sustainability ,Climate and Comfort
SOLAR SHADING
The term "solar shading" describes the use of several architectural
strategies and tools to regulate how much sunshine or solar
radiation enters a building. The objective is to minimize the
energy needed for heating while controlling the amount of heat
gained from the sun, optimizing daylighting, and enhancing
indoor comfort.
Source :A Study on Shading of Buildings as a Preventive Measure for Passive Cooling by
Mohammad Arif Kamal
Source:https://basc.pnnl.gov/images/sources-heat-gain-house-include-solar-gains-infiltration-
.Composition of global radiation
conduction-through-walls-and-roof
The total amount of solar energy received by a horizontal Heat gains in a building refer to the increase in temperature within a
surface is referred to as global radiation. It
space caused by various sources of heat. These gains can greatly effect a
is made up of three parts:
building's energy efficiency and comfort levels.
PHOTOVOLTAICS FOR
PROFFESIONALS
Photovoltaics (PV) refer to the technology that converts sunlight directly into electricity using solar
cells.
Connection of PV modules
wiring solar panels of different ratings in series
Wiring solar pv panels in parallel Mixed wiring of solar panels
Source:https://bushenergy.com.au/pages/mixing-solar-panels
Parts of a PV System
l Solar Modules: Arrays of interconnecting solar
cells encased in protective materials. l Inverters
convert direct current (DC) from photovoltaic
modules to alternating current (AC) for
usage in homes or grids. l The Balance of System
(BoS) comprises mounting structures, cabling, and
monitoring equipment.
Types of PV Systems
l. Grid-Tied means connected to the electrical
grid.Excess energy can be put back into the grid,
usually with incentives. l Stand-Alone: Operates
independently from the grid, typically with
batteries.Suitable for distant
areas. l Hybrid systems:Combine PV with other
energy sources (such as wind and diesel) or storage.
Types of PV Systems
FACADE THERMAL PERFORMANCE
Thermal comfort is a subjective state of satisfaction with the thermal environment in which anindividual does not feel overly hot or cold. ISO 7730 defines it as "the state of mind that
expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment."
Influencing factors:
l Air temperature
Mean radiant temperature.
Air speed,
relativehumidity.
Metabolic rate (activity level).
Clothing Insulation
Uw Value (Window)
The U⒲ value is the heat transfer
coefficient of a window
HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U – VALUE)
Cold bridges
MOISTURE AND
COLD BRIDGES
Thermal Bridge
Allowance: EnEV
recommends
a thermal bridge
allowance (ΔU) of 0.05
W/(m²K) for
high-performance joints
and 0.10 W/(m²K) for
regular joints.
AUTHOR :SYLIVIA KANYORA
GSPublisherVersion 0.0.100.100
Thermal comfort factors and their effects.
Source:https://www.researchgate.net/figure/
Thermal-comfort-factors-and-their-effects_fig1_365499413
Sections of a building
where thermal bridging
causes heat loss, leading
to serious energy waste
&discomfort problems.
The isothermal analysis, shown on the right, reveals temperature
gradients. The isotherms show a significant temperature drop near
the connecting point, with the lowest recorded surface temperature
being 7.2 °C. This cold bridge develops due to material conductivity
and structural design, which allows heat to
Moisture Sources and Effects in Buildings
escape more easily through certain locations.
Source :MID - Sustainability, Climate and
Comfort – Alvaro Balderrama, 2024
thermal bridges and their impact on buildings
https://tools.bregroup.com/certifiedthermalproducts/
page.jsp?id=3073
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
93
The semester poster discusses sustainability,
climate, and comfort in architecture. It contains
seven themes, each of aspects demonstrates
how technologies such as photovoltaic systems
and green facades enable human-centered,
sustainable design. The poster calls for green
architecture with a picture of a potential green
building. The poster focuses on the necessity
for flexible, resilient, and sustainable designs
that meet human and environmental demands.
ACOUSTIC
PERFORMANCE
Noise pollution control enhances occupant
comfort and productivity. Noise transmission is
minimized by strategic design and sound insulation
materials.
Sustainability, Climate, and Comfort: Win
Envisioning Green Architecture for a
ENERGY
EFFICIENCY
Low-energy buildings minimize operational energy
consumption, setting the stage for a sustainable
future. The major drivers are insulation, renewable
energy, and smart systems.
Energy Use (kWh)
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
Heating / Cooling Lighting Appliances
Energy Categories
Before Efficiency
Measures
After Efficiency
Measures
Other
Acoustic Absorption Coefficient
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Solar panels, being one
of the leading renewable
energy technologies,
harness the energy of the
sun to generate electricity,
reducing the consumption
of fossil fuels. Coupled
with proper insulation
and effective thermal
control, they significantly
lower the energy profile
of a building while
enhancing sustainability.
125 250 500 1k 2k 4k
Frequency (Hz)
6mm 10mm 15mm 20mm 25mm 50mm
Green buildings of the future promote acoustic
insulation through triple glazing, acoustic laminated
glass, and composite panels with high levels
of Sound Reduction Index (SRI) for sound reduction.
Green facade elements like vertical gardens
provide natural acoustic barriers and aesthetics.
Proper sealing of façade joints minimizes sound
transmission, creating a more comfortable, quieter
indoor climate with better acoustic performance.
SOLAR SHADING
Solar heat gain is minimized by dynamic shading
systems by up to 70%, maximizing thermal comfort
and energy conservation.
*4
*1
This image represents a futuristic green and sustainable
building, designed and visualized using AI rendering technology.
*3
*2
Dila Dil
94
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
d Comfort: Winter Semester 2024-2025
rchitecture for a Sustainable Future
THERMAL
PERFORMANCE
Optimizing thermal performance ensures comfort and
reduces energy use. High thermal mass materials
stabilize indoor temperatures.
Heat fluxes in transparent building structures
*7
*5
Thermal Energy
Heat transmission is by conduction, convection,
and radiation, affecting building energy balance.
Thermal boundary resistance is the resistance
to heat flow at the interface between two materials,
based on surface properties.
Thermal capacity is the capacity of a material to
store heat, buffering indoor temperatures and
enhancing comfort.
Heat transfer by building components is measured
by the U-value, taking into account the
thermal resistance of every layer.
Thermal bridges are localized hot spots of
enhanced heat loss, commonly at structural connections
or inadequately insulated details.
MOISTURE AND
HYGIENE
Effective moisture control averts condensation,
mold, and structural damage and preserves
healthy indoor environments.
*6
Illustration of Basement Foundation Showing
Drainage and Damp Proofing Only
VENTILATION
Ventilation ensures indoor air quality without
wasting excessive energy. Hybrid systems offer a
compromise between natural and mechanical
ventilation.
een and sustainable
g AI rendering technology.
Heat fluxes in transparent building structures
Design Principles of Solar Building
• Orientation and Shading: Buildings are oriented to receive maximum sunlight throughout the year.
• Solar Panel Integration: Solar panels are integrated with building envelopes and roofs. BIPV systems have
been used as a visually appealing and efficient method to generate solar energy.
• Energy Efficiency: In addition to the use of solar energy, energy efficient materials such as insulation, high-efficiency
lighting, and high-end HVAC systems have been used.
• Passive Solar Design: Passive solar design methods such as natural light and daylight for lighting and heating
have been used in conjunction with active solar systems, increasing overall energy efficiency.
MID 1040
Sustainability, Climate and Comfort
Winter Semester 2024-2025 Poster
Lecturer: Alvaro Balderrama
*8
Dila Dil
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
95
SUSTAINABILITY, CLIMATE AND COMFORT
MID 1040
OMAR SHAZI ALIKKAL
ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE
Soundscape studies,take a broader and more humanfocused
view of urban sound environments. Instead of
just reducing unwanted noise, this approach
emphasizes the importance of context, the sounds
people enjoy, and individual preferences.
SOLAR GEOMETRY
Location of the sun relative to a horizontal plane
Azimuth: Measures the sun's direction on the
horizontal plane (compass direction).
Altitude: Measures the sun's height above the horizon.
SUN PATH DIAGRAM
FIG 5. Solar angles
A sun path diagram tracks the sun's sky movements
throughout the day and year to help designers optimize
building design while understanding light exposure.
FIG 1. Soundscape investigation
WEIGHTED SOUND REDUCTION INDEX (RW)
Rating used to measure and indicate how effective a
soundproofing wall, system or material is. Rw is based on
the amount of sound that can be transmitted through a
noise wall.
FIG 6. Sun Path Diagram
FIG 2. Comparison of profiles
FIG 3. Shadow Box
FLANKING
Flanking sound (or flanking noise) is sound that transmits
between spaces indirectly, going over or around, rather
than directly through the main separating element.
HORIZONTAL SHADOW ANGLE (HSA) AND
VERTICAL SHADOW ANGLE (VSA)
The application of HSA and VSA principles remains
essential for architects and designers to develop
successful solar shading systems for buildings.
FIG 7. vertical and horizontal shading
INTERACTION OF SUN WITH BUILDING ENVELOPE
FIG 3. Flanking of Noise Through Different Surfaces
SOUND ABSORPTIONS BY FAÇADES
The absorption techniques
used in facade design serve as
essential sound control
methods to enhance acoustic
performance by implementing
specialized materials including
acoustic panels and porous
materials and acoustic
insulation.
FIG 4. Textile noise protection facade
Reduction factor Fc
0.1 <FC<0.4
Shading Coefficient Sc
Sc=g window /g 4mm float
Total energy transmiss
g-total = g window*Fc
Omar Shazi Alikkal
96
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
ENERGY EFFICIENVY
Building energy efficiency describes the practice of
minimizing energy usage for heating and cooling and
lighting and powering the building without compromising
comfort levels. The integration of renewable energy
systems such as solar panels helps to reduce
dependence on non-renewable energy sources while
making buildings more sustainable.
THERMAL PERFORMANCE
The thermal performance of a building refers to its
ability to maintain comfortable indoor temperatures by
minimizing heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer.
It depends on factors like insulation, airtightness,
glazing, thermal mass, and ventilation. A well-designed
building with good thermal performance reduces energy
use, lowers costs, and ensures comfort while
contributing to sustainability.
BUILDING ENERGY ACT (GEG 2020)
BIPV
BIPV sets itself apart from standard photovoltaics,
because BIVP takes control of the typical functions of
cladding and it is well integrated into an architecturally
artistic and aesthetic background. Architects have
designated photovoltaics as new, interesting and
designable building components.
HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U-VALUE)
A building element's U-value indicates how quickly heat
flows through it. Lower U-values indicate better
insulation performance because heat transmission
occurs more slowly.
FIG 8. Layers of BIPV
DIFFERENT MODULE TYPES
FIG 9. Different wall types
HEAT TRANSFER IN ALUMINUM PROFILE
The thermal break is a non-conductive barrier (typically
made of polyamide or other insulating materials)
inserted between the inner and outer sections of the
aluminum profile.Thermal break reduces heat transfer
across the profile, maintaining a higher surface
temperature on the interior side
FIG 10. Thermal Analysis
BIPV CAN BE INTEGRATED IN MANY WAYS
THERMAL BRIDGING
Thermal bridges, also known as cold bridges, are areas
of the building envelope where the heat flow is different
compared with the surrounding areas.
Cold bridges are caused by material or geometry
FIG 11. Causes of Thermal Bridge
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
97
[1]
[2]
EN 13830:2015, Curtain walling - Product standard.
DIN 4109-35:2016, Sound insulation in buildings – Part 35: Data for verification of sound
insulation(component catalogue) – Elements, windows, doors, curtain walling.
In accordance with the ift RESEARCH REPORT (March 2017) “Developing a component catalogue
. Facade Information
for determining 1 . Facade airborne Information sound insulation as well as flanking sound insulation of curtain walling”
by ift Rosenheim, an area-based energy calculation of Rw,res has been carried out for the user
Profile System:
FWS 50
Insulating glass
defined window Profile System: unit.
FWS 50
Insulating glass
Facade major mullion: 536850
Glass ID
Makeup
Facade major mullion: 536850
Glass ID
Makeup
The following Facade are minor taken mullion: into account: -- official 1-4 test certificates, 6-12-4-12-4 (38 mm) results of internal profile
Facade minor mullion: -- 1-4 6-12-4-12-4 (38 mm)
measurements Facade as transom: well as national 322440 and international correction factors in accordance with DIN EN
Facade transom:
322440
4109-35:2016 Facade and secondary EN 13830:2015.The transom: -- output value Rw,res currently does not take account of the
safety coefficients Facade secondary specified transom: in national -- standards for the calculation.
Project Name:
Project Name:
Project Location:
Location: Name:
Location:
3 4
3 4
Date:
Date:
By:
By:
Acoustic Report
Acoustic Report
Field Glass Details Glass Rw(dB) Dimension(mm) Field Area(m²)
1 2
1 2
1 6-12-4-12-4 (38 mm) 36 1275.0 x 2725.0 3.474
2 6-12-4-12-4 (38 mm) 36 1275.0 x 2725.0 3.474
3 6-12-4-12-4 (38 mm) 36 1275.0 x 2725.0 3.474
4 6-12-4-12-4 (38 mm) 36 1275.0 x 2725.0 3.474
1,250mm
1,250mm
1,250mm
n Infill ID 2,500mm
1,250mm
n Infill ID 2,500mm
Library DEtmold
Library DEtmold
Germany Library . DEtmold
Germany
Germany
1/2
1/2
2/2
Jan. 08. 2025
Jan. 08. 2025
Zahra Parsafar Date: Jan. 08. 2025
Zahra Parsafar
By: Zahra Parsafar
Frequency, Hz / dB* Rw C Ctr OITC STC
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
24 28 34 48 39 56
37 -2 -5 29 37
*The values expressed in the frequency table correspond to the central values of the 1/3 octave band
Disclaimer: The acoustic performance data provided in the reports is based on a test protocol or an estimation
and may be used if user actual glazing is identical to input data described herein. Acoustic performance data
herein is only applicable for glazing dimensions 1,23 m x 1,48 m (as per testing standard). Estimation of acoustic
performance is based on component-similarity assumptions which are derived from measured data and
interpolation to expand the database of values from test protocols. Due to inherent variations in acoustic
performance when testing in accordance with EN ISO 10140-3/EN ISO 10140-2, some variation in the calculated
performance can also be expected. As such, the weighted performance, Rw, and adaptation terms, C and Ctr,
should typically be considered to be accurate within ±2 dB. However, wider deviations can occur. Actual
performance may vary according to the glazing dimensions, frame system, noise sources and many other
parameters. The acoustic performance data herein should not be used as a substitute for tests of actual glazing.
For more information, please consult Assumptions and Terminology section in Guardian Acoustic Assistant. By
accessing this calculator, you agree not to alter or modify the generated report data and information, by any
means. Any manual alteration will be your own responsibility and will annul all the content of the report.
Wednesday, January 8, 2025 | Acoustic database 20221229
Acoustic Report
Mineral Rockwool
Concrete Slab
Mullion
Attachment system
Outer Gasket
Cladding
Mineral Rockwool
Concrete Slab
Insulation
Transom
Cover Cap
Transom profile
SI isolator for
increased thermal
insulation
Mullion profile
Inner gasket
Sustainability
Climate
and Comfort
S e m e s t e r R e p o r t W i S e 2 0 2 4
P r e p a r e d b y
Z a h r a P a r s a f a r
Assessment of Facade Acoustic Performance
Bibliothek der Hochschule für Musik Detmold
Façade acoustic performance assessment is vital in urban design,
focusing on sound absorption, reflection, and transmission. It
includes sound pressure measurements, material evaluation,
and balancing acoustics with aesthetics for optimized spaces.
Acoustic
Performance
Acoustic performance in architecture is crucial for comfort, functionality, and
sustainability, categorized as follows:
Facade Acoustics: Facades are critical for sound insulation, reducing external noise
and enhancing urban soundscapes
Room Acoustics: Focuses on clarity and reverberation
Shorter reverberation times improve speech intelligibility, while longer times suit music.
Interspatial Acoustics: Reduces noise transmission between spaces, maintaining
privacy.Environmental Acoustics: Manages urban and natural noise for pleasant
environments
Mechanical Acoustics: Limits noise from HVAC systems and machinery to enhance
interior comfort.
Sound Pressure Levels
Sound Source Identification
Curtain-wall detailes
BPSolver
2. Codes and Specifications
Rw Calculation
3. Results BPSolver
Rw,res = 35 dB
2,700mm
2,700mm
2,700mm
2,700mm
5,400mm
5,400mm
Acoustic Performance
Glazing Configuration
6mm Float Glass
12mm Cavity
6mm Float Glass
12mm Cavity
6mm Float Glass
Sound Reduction Indices
Soundscape Radar Plot
Soundscape Descriptor
Solar Shading
Energy Resources:
Commercial Primary Energy / Renewable Energy
Key Principles
Soundscapes: Integrate natural and man-made sounds to influence well-being and
behavior.
Sound Interaction: Surfaces reflect, absorb, or scatter sound.
Design Impacts: Façades must address sound absorption, emissions, and insulation
to comply with regulations and improve living standards in urban settings.
Vertical facades
Solar Physical Effects in Matter
Solar Diagram
Zahra Parsafar
98
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Energy Efficency
Reducing energy use while maintaining functionality through
insulation, efficient systems, and appliances.
Benefits: Cuts energy consumption, lowers costs, reduces
environmental impact, and promotes sustainability by reducing
reliance on non-renewable resources.
Moisture and Hygiene
Warm air, holds more moisture cooling increases humidity, causing condensation.
Excess indoor moisture from activities increases risks of mold and frost damage.
Solar Technology
Photovoltaic Effect
Converts sunlight into electricity via semiconductors like silicon.
Water Transport Mechanisms
Capillary Action: Water rises against gravity in small pores.
Diffusion/Effusion: Movement through porous materials depends on pore size and
vapor pressure
Cold Bridges
Risks: Heat loss, condensation, and mold from design or material properties.
Single-Shell Walls
Composite Systems
Interior Insulation
Rear-Ventilated Walls
Components
Panels, inverters (convert DC to AC), and grid connection.
Thermal Performance
Thermal Energy and Comfort
Heat is energy from kinetic activity of molecules; sensed as temperature.
Thermal comfort is balancing heat production and dissipation.
Ventilation
Airtightness and Ventilation
Fresh air ensures health and comfort; ventilation removes stale
air and regulates CO2 levels (ideal <0.15%).
Heat Transmission Mechanisms
Conduction: Heat transfer through solids; efficiency depends on material density and
structure.
Convection: Heat movement via airflow; impacted by boundary resistances.
Radiation: Heat emitted as electromagnetic waves; intensity increases with
temperature
Ventilation Types
Natural: Window or airflow-based.
Mechanical: Controlled systems, essential in airtight modern
buildings.
Single-Shell Walls
Composite Systems
Interior Insulation
Rear-Ventilated Walls
Thermal Behavior in Building Systems
Wall Systems
Concrete walls transfer heat based on material density and insulation.
Insulation (interior/exterior) reduces heat flow but requires moisture control.
Rear-ventilated walls use convection for condensation management.
U-value: Measures heat transfer through structures; lower values indicate better
insulation.
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
99
MID 1040 Sustainability, Climate and Comfort | Semester Report| Winter Semester 2024-2025
Lecturers: Alvaro Balderrama | Manfred Starlinger | Prof. Daniel Arztmann
Assessment of Facade Acoustic Performance | Sound Pressure Levels
Submitted by: Zahra Tahmasbi
Acoustic Performance
Noise effects on humans
noise and health:
• Nighttime noise: Sleep disruption
• Vulnerable groups: Higher risk
• Poor sleep: Stress & chronic disease
• Long-term noise: Heart disease & death
• Traffic noise: Cardiovascular risks
• Urban noise: Higher illness rates
• Decibel increase: Increased disease risk
• WHO noise limits: Health protection
• Natural sounds: Mental/physical benefits
• Lack of nature sounds: Increased stress
Assessment of Facade Acoustic Performance
Bibliothek der Hochschule für Musik Detmold
Winter Semester 25/24
Site Analysis
Sound Pressure Levels
Area 1 | Sound pressure = -59.9
Noise Map
WWW.GoogleMaps.com
Area 4 | Sound pressure = -56.7
Solar Shading
Solar geometry
Earth’s orbit & axial tilt: Cause of seasons
Hemispheres tilted: Varying sunlight
Tilt towards sun: Summer (longer days, warmer)
Tilt away from sun: Winter (shorter days, colder)
Cyclical tilt/orbit: Annual seasonal pattern
Area 2 | Sound pressure = -54.1
Area 5 | Sound pressure = -62.2
Area 3 | Sound pressure = -45.8
Area 6 | Sound pressure = -60.2
Assessment of Facade Acoustic Performance | Sound Source Identification |
Sound Frequency Source Content Identification | Frequency Content
Area 1
Area 2
Declination angle: Sun’s rays vs. Earth’s equator
Positive declination: Sun north of equator
Negative declination: Sun south of equator
Influences solar radiation: At different latitudes
Day length: Varies by latitude
Tilt/orbit: Cause of change
Equator: Consistent 12 hours
Poles: Extreme variation
Summer: Long days at poles
Winter: Short days at poles
Day length: Influences seasons
Area 3
Area 4
Composition of global radiation & Typical irradiation
figures on horizontal plane
Soundscape
Section - 01
Area 5
Area 6
Insolation on vertical facades at different altitudes
Assessment of Facade Acoustic Performance | Soundscape Assessment & Interaction of sun with building envelope
Soundscape Radar Plot
Application and Equipments
Assessment of Facade of Facade Acoustic Acoustic Performance | | Soundscape Assessment
Section Section - 01 - 01
Assessment of Facade Acoustic Performance | Soundscape Assessment
Section - 01
Soundscape Radar Radar Plot Plot
Soundscape Radar Radar Plot Plot
A soundscape is:how we
experience and react to
the sounds around us. The
soundscape approach focuses on
the value of sound in everyday life
and uses research to understand
how people perceive sounds in
different environments.
6
5
4
3
2
6 6
5 1
5
4
4
3
Eventful Vibrant Pleasant Calm Uneventful Monotonous Annoying Chaotic 3
2
2
3 3 5 4 3 3 4 3 Area 1
1
1
4 3 2 2 3 2 4 4 Area 2
Eventful Eventful Vibrant Calm Uneventful Monotonous Annoying Vibrant Pleasant Pleasant Chaotic
Calm Eventful 3 Vibrant Pleasant Calm Uneventful 2 Monotonous2 Annoying 4Chaotic
4 1 1 5 Area 3
3 3 Area 3 3 5 4 3 33 4 3 1
3 3 5 4 3 4 3 Area 1
3 5 4 3
3 5 4 2 1 3 2 4 Area 4
4 3 2 2 3 22 4 4 Area 2
4 3 2 2 3 4 3 2 2 3 4 4 Area 2
4 3 1 1 2 4 5 Area 3
4 34 2 1 3 2 5 Area 4 Area 5
3 1 1 2 22 4 5 3
4 3 1 1 2
3 2 1 3 22 4 5 4
4 3 2 1 3 4 3 2 1 3 2 4 5 Area 4
3 24 2 2 3 4 Area 4 Area 6
4 3 2 1 3 22 5 4 Area 5
4 3 2 1 3 4 3 2 1 3 2 5 4 Area 5
3 2 2 2 3 22 4 4 Area 6
3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 4 4 Area 6
Soundscape Descriptor
Soundscape Descriptor
Technical Solutions for daylight control
Illuminance Value
Venetian blinds; 2 Independent
segments
Scattering systems
Glazing with mirro profiles
Solid transparent profiles
in glazing
Slats with 2 functional Areas
Slat structures in transparent
Material
Sound Quality Visual Quality Appropriateness Perceived Loudness
Sound Sound Quality 3 QualityVisual Quality Visual 3 Quality Appropriateness Appropriateness 2 Perceived Perceived 3Loudness
LoudnessArea 1
3 3 2 34 Area 21
3 3 2 3 3 2 3 Area 1
2 2 3 43 Area 32
3 3 2 3 3 2 4 Area 2
1 43
2
Visual
2 3
Appropriateness
3
Perceived
Area 3
2
Sound Quality
2 2
Quality
3 3 32 Area
Loudness
1 1 2 1 3 5 3 21 2 Area 54
1 2 Area 4
3 Area 3 3 2 1
5 1 5
1 1 5 1 Area 65
1 1 1 1 5 Area
1 1 5 14 Area 6Area 3 3 2 2
1 1 5 1 Area 6
3 Area 2 2 3 3
1 2 3 2 Area 4
1 1 5 1 Area 5
1 1 5 1 Area 6
Moveable blinds
Light shelf
Zahra Tahmasbi
100
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Connection of PV modules in series
series-parallel
series-parallel
Thermal Performance
Building Energy Act (GEG 2020) | Reference Building
for Residentials
Issues and parameters related to condensation
central inverter in higher-voltage
systems
central inverter or multiple
inverters
Mould growth at window Mould Damage to building materials
growth due to temperature drop in Microbiological contamination and
corners and roller shutter casing. chipping caused by moisture in
wooden parts.
String inverters
inverters for invidual modules
Heat transfer Coefficient
Structural damage Rising moisture
on an interior wall with grid for
humidity measurement.
Humidity measurement in a
construction element Destructive
humidity measurement of building
moisture in borehole.
Energy Efficiency
Classification of methods for solar energy utilization
Humidity measurement on building
material Non-destructive humidity
measurement of moisture on
building material.
Thermal Insulation in exterior walls
Sample taking Sample taking
of the plaster to measure the
moisture within the near-surface
wall structure.
Rose›s Six Phases of Moisture Absorption in Porous Materials
Solar Thermal Energy Systems
Flat plate collector
Cylindrical parabolic concentrating
collector
Thermal Insulation in exterior walls
Flat plate collector
Wall construction with thermal
insulation composite system
Ventilation
Solar air heater
Paraboloid concentrating collector
Wall construction with interior
insulation
Rear-ventilated wall construction
Ventilation openings in the façade
Ventilation through window Ventilation through window with
exterior impact pane
Air exchange rate [1/h]: 0.5 - 20 Air exchange rate [1/h]: 0.5 - 5
Adjustability: Medium
Adjustability: Low
Adjustability: Low
Adjustability: High
Forced circulation water heating
system
Solar water heater
Ventilation Flaps
Air exchange rate [1/h]: 1 - 3
Adjustability: Low
Adjustability: Low
Gap Ventilation
Air exchange rate [1/h]: 0.5 - 2
Adjustability: High
Adjustability: High
Moisture and Hygiene
Organisations & Certificates related to Energy Efficiency
LEED
BREEAM
DGNB
The Building Envelope - Facade
Water Vapor Pressure
Building-relevant types of water
Ventilation Openint (Sensor or
pressure control)
Air exchange rate [1/h]: 0.5 - 2
Adjustability: Low- medium
Adjustability: Very high
Ventilation-related energy loss
Ventilation Types:
Natural Ventilation:
Relies on air pressure
differences to drive airflow,
typically through
opening windows. Temperature
differences or
the “chimney effect”
(warm air rising) can
also help.
Mechanical Ventilation:
Uses systems to control
air exchange.
MID DESIGN CONCEPTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
101
5. EVENTS
102 DOKUMENTATION - KM EXKURSION
EVENTS
Visit to Schüco’s Headquarters / Hands-on Workshop (FWS 50)
Bielefeld, October 10th 2024
First-semester students from the MID-FD
visited Schüco’s headquarters in Bielefeld for an
immersive learning experience led by Mr. Ulrich
Artmann. The visit combined theoretical insights
with hands-on practice.
The day began with a lecture on stick constructions,
focusing on the FWS 50 system, followed by a
guided tour of the campus. At the Welcome Forum,
students engaged in informal discussions over
breakfast before exploring the showroom’s latest
technological advancements.
In the afternoon, students participated in
a practical workshop at the training center,
assembling an FWS 50 prototype to deepen their
understanding of its components and installation.
“This visit provided valuable exposure to cuttingedge
façade technologies, bridging academic
learning with industry practice.”
- Marie Al Helou
Pictures by Dila Dil
EVENTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
103
EVENTS
Visit to AGC Interpane
Lauenförde, November 07th 2024
Students from the first and third semester of
the MID Façade Design program had the unique
opportunity to visit the production plant of the
glass company AGC Interpane in Lauenförde.
The visit began with an insightful presentation led
by Yannick Rehmet and Björn Bender, offering an
in-depth overview of the latest innovations in glass
processing. The hosts introduced AGC’s cuttingedge
technology and showcased some of the
company‘s most notable projects, emphasizing
the advancements in glass production and the
role it plays in modern façade design.
After the presentation, the students were
guided through the glass production facility.
They were introduced to the various stages of
glass processing, providing an understanding
of the intricate steps involved in creating highperformance
glass used in façades.
“This exposure helped reinforce the theoretical
concepts we had learned in the classroom, creating
a clear connection with real-world applications in
façade design.”
- Marie Al Helou
Pictures by Dila Dil
104 EVENTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
Scchhüccoooooo AAOC Woooooorrkshhoooooop – AA Daaaay oooooof Leaaaarrnnnnniinnnnng aaaannnnnd Innnnnnnnnnoooooovaaaatiioooooon
BBiiiiiiiieeeeeeeelllllllleeeeeeeeffffffffeeeeeeeelllllllldddddddd,,,, DDDDeeeeeeeecccccccceeeeeeeemmmmmmbbbbbeeeeeeeerrrrrrrr 12222,,,, 2222022224
MMMIIDDDD SSSSSSS66 ccccccccllllllllaaaaaaaassssssssssssssss wwwwwwwwaaaaaaaassssssss iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnvvvvvvvviiiiiiiitttttttteeeeeeeedddddddd ttttttttoooooooo SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo’’ssssssss
hhhhhhhheeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaddddddddqquuuuuuuuaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrtttttttteeeeeeeerrrrrrrrssssssss iiiiiiiinnnnnnnn BBiiiiiiiieeeeeeeelllllllleeeeeeeeffffffffeeeeeeeelllllllldddddddd ffffffffoooooooorrrrrrrr aaaaaaaannnnnnnn eeeeeeeennnnnnnnggggggggaaaaaaaaggggggggiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd
hhhhhhhhaaaaaaaannnnnnnnddddddddssssssss---oooooooonnnnnnnn wwwwwwwwoooooooorrrrrrrrkkksssssssshhhhhhhhoooooooopppppppp ffffffffooooooooccccccccuuuuuuuusssssssseeeeeeeedddddddd oooooooonnnnnnnn SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo’’ssssssss
AAddddddddvvvvvvvvaaaaaaaannnnnnnncccccccceeeeeeeedddddddd FFFaaaaaaaaççaaaaaaaaddddddddeeeeeeee CCoooooooonnnnnnnnssssssssttttttttrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuccccccccttttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn ssssssssyyyyyyyysssssssstttttttteeeeeeeemmmmmm... TTTThhhhhhhheeeeeeee ddddddddaaaaaaaayyyyyyyy
bbbbbeeeeeeeeggggggggaaaaaaaannnnnnnn wwwwwwwwiiiiiiiitttttttthhhhhhhh aaaaaaaannnnnnnn iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnffffffffoooooooorrrrrrrrmmmmmmaaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiivvvvvvvveeeeeeee tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeeeoooooooorrrrrrrreeeeeeeettttttttiiiiiiiiccccccccaaaaaaaallllllll lllllllleeeeeeeeccccccccttttttttuuuuuuuurrrrrrrreeeeeeee lllllllleeeeeeeedddddddd
bbbbbyyyyyyyy MMMrrrrrrrr... 4lllllllliiiiiiii AArrrrrrrrttttttttmmmmmmaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnn,,,, wwwwwwwwhhhhhhhhoooooooo ddddddddiiiiiiiissssssssccccccccuuuuuuuusssssssssssssssseeeeeeeedddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee
ccccccccaaaaaaaappppppppaaaaaaaabbbbbiiiiiiiilllllllliiiiiiiittttttttiiiiiiiieeeeeeeessssssss aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnoooooooovvvvvvvvaaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnnssssssss ooooooooffffffff SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo’’ssssssss AAOCC
ssssssssyyyyyyyysssssssstttttttteeeeeeeemmmmmm..
SSSSSSSttttttttuuuuuuuuddddddddeeeeeeeennnnnnnnttttttttssssssss hhhhhhhhaaaaaaaadddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee uuuuuuuunnnnnnnniiiiiiiiqquuuuuuuueeeeeeee ooooooooppppppppppppppppoooooooorrrrrrrrttttttttuuuuuuuunnnnnnnniiiiiiiittttttttyyyyyyyy ttttttttoooooooo vvvvvvvviiiiiiiissssssssiiiiiiiitttttttt aaaaaaaa
nnnnnnnneeeeeeeewwwwwwwwllllllllyyyyyyyy ccccccccoooooooonnnnnnnnssssssssttttttttrrrrrrrruuuuuuuucccccccctttttttteeeeeeeedddddddd ppppppppaaaaaaaavvvvvvvviiiiiiiilllllllliiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn tttttttthhhhhhhhaaaaaaaatttttttt uuuuuuuuttttttttiiiiiiiilllllllliiiiiiiizeeeeeeeedddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee
iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnoooooooovvvvvvvvaaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiivvvvvvvveeeeeeee Grrrrrrrriiiiiiiidddddddd--- 2222 ---SSSSSSShhhhhhhheeeeeeeellllllllllllllll ssssssssyyyyyyyysssssssstttttttteeeeeeeemmmmmm,,,, sssssssshhhhhhhhoooooooowwwwwwwwccccccccaaaaaaaassssssssiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee
iiiiiiiimmmmmmpppppppprrrrrrrreeeeeeeessssssssssssssssiiiiiiiivvvvvvvveeeeeeee ffffffffrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeee---ffffffffoooooooorrrrrrrrmmmmmm ppppppppoooooooossssssssssssssssiiiiiiiibbbbbiiiiiiiilllllllliiiiiiiittttttttiiiiiiiieeeeeeeessssssss ooooooooÄeeeeeeeerrrrrrrreeeeeeeedddddddd bbbbbyyyyyyyy tttttttthhhhhhhhiiiiiiiissssssss
ddddddddeeeeeeeessssssssiiiiiiiiggggggggnnnnnnnn aaaaaaaapppppppppppppppprrrrrrrrooooooooaaaaaaaacccccccchhhhhhhh... TTTThhhhhhhhiiiiiiiissssssss vvvvvvvviiiiiiiissssssssiiiiiiiitttttttt aaaaaaaalllllllllllllllloooooooowwwwwwwweeeeeeeedddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeeemmmmmm ttttttttoooooooo sssssssseeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
hhhhhhhhoooooooowwwwwwww ccccccccuuuuuuuuttttttttttttttttiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg---eeeeeeeeddddddddggggggggeeeeeeee tttttttteeeeeeeecccccccchhhhhhhhnnnnnnnnoooooooollllllllooooooooggggggggyyyyyyyy iiiiiiiissssssss aaaaaaaapppppppppppppppplllllllliiiiiiiieeeeeeeedddddddd iiiiiiiinnnnnnnn rrrrrrrreeeeeeeeaaaaaaaallllllll---
wwwwwwwwoooooooorrrrrrrrlllllllldddddddd
pppppppprrrrrrrroooooooojeeeeeeeeccccccccttttttttssssssss..
FFFoooooooolllllllllllllllloooooooowwwwwwwwiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg aaaaaaaa rrrrrrrreeeeeeeeffffffffrrrrrrrreeeeeeeesssssssshhhhhhhhiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg bbbbbrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeaaaaaaaakkkffffffffaaaaaaaasssssssstttttttt aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd aaaaaaaa ddddddddeeeeeeeelllllllliiiiiiiicccccccciiiiiiiioooooooouuuuuuuussssssss
lllllllluuuuuuuunnnnnnnncccccccchhhhhhhh aaaaaaaatttttttt tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo MMMeeeeeeeennnnnnnnssssssssaaaaaaaa,,,, tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee aaaaaaaafffffffftttttttteeeeeeeerrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnoooooooooooooooonnnnnnnn
sssssssseeeeeeeessssssssssssssssiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn sssssssshhhhhhhhiiiiiiiifffffffftttttttteeeeeeeedddddddd ttttttttoooooooo aaaaaaaa hhhhhhhhaaaaaaaannnnnnnnddddddddssssssss---oooooooonnnnnnnn ffffffffaaaaaaaabbbbbrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiccccccccaaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn
wwwwwwwwoooooooorrrrrrrrkkksssssssshhhhhhhhoooooooopppppppp... TTTThhhhhhhhiiiiiiiissssssss sssssssseeeeeeeeggggggggmmmmmmeeeeeeeennnnnnnntttttttt ffffffffooooooooccccccccuuuuuuuusssssssseeeeeeeedddddddd oooooooonnnnnnnn SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo
AAdddddddddddddddd---oooooooonnnnnnnn CCoooooooonnnnnnnnssssssssttttttttrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuccccccccttttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnnssssssss ffffffffoooooooorrrrrrrr ttttttttiiiiiiiimmmmmmbbbbbeeeeeeeerrrrrrrr,,,, wwwwwwwwhhhhhhhheeeeeeeerrrrrrrreeeeeeee ssssssssttttttttuuuuuuuuddddddddeeeeeeeennnnnnnnttttttttssssssss
aaaaaaaaccccccccttttttttiiiiiiiivvvvvvvveeeeeeeellllllllyyyyyyyy ppppppppaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrttttttttiiiiiiiicccccccciiiiiiiippppppppaaaaaaaatttttttteeeeeeeedddddddd iiiiiiiinnnnnnnn bbbbbuuuuuuuuiiiiiiiillllllllddddddddiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg aaaaaaaa pppppppprrrrrrrroooooooottttttttoooooooottttttttyyyyyyyyppppppppeeeeeeee... TTTThhhhhhhhiiiiiiiissssssss
pppppppprrrrrrrraaaaaaaaccccccccttttttttiiiiiiiiccccccccaaaaaaaallllllll eeeeeeeexxxppppppppeeeeeeeerrrrrrrriiiiiiiieeeeeeeennnnnnnncccccccceeeeeeee pppppppprrrrrrrroooooooovvvvvvvviiiiiiiiddddddddeeeeeeeedddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee cccccccchhhhhhhhaaaaaaaannnnnnnncccccccceeeeeeee ttttttttoooooooo ggggggggaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiinnnnnnnn
aaaaaaaa ddddddddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppeeeeeeeerrrrrrrr uuuuuuuunnnnnnnnddddddddeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrssssssssttttttttaaaaaaaannnnnnnnddddddddiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg ooooooooffffffff tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee ssssssssyyyyyyyysssssssstttttttteeeeeeeemmmmmm'ssssssss
ccccccccoooooooommmmmmppppppppoooooooonnnnnnnneeeeeeeennnnnnnnttttttttssssssss aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnssssssssttttttttaaaaaaaallllllllllllllllaaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn mmmmmmeeeeeeeetttttttthhhhhhhhooooooooddddddddssssssss,,,, wwwwwwwwhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiilllllllleeeeeeee aaaaaaaallllllllssssssssoooooooo
Scchhüccoooooo AAOC Woooooorrkshhoooooop – AA Daaaay oooooof Leaaaarrnnnnniinnnnng aaaannnnnd Innnnnnnnnnoooooovaaaatiioooooon
lllllllleeeeeeeeaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrnnnnnnnniiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg vvvvvvvvaaaaaaaalllllllluuuuuuuuaaaaaaaabbbbblllllllleeeeeeee ttttttttiiiiiiiippppppppssssssss ffffffffrrrrrrrroooooooommmmmm SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo eeeeeeeexxxppppppppeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrttttttttssssssss..
BBiiiiiiiieeeeeeeelllllllleeeeeeeeffffffffeeeeeeeelllllllldddddddd,,,, DDDDeeeeeeeecccccccceeeeeeeemmmmmmbbbbbeeeeeeeerrrrrrrr 12222,,,, 2222022224
TTTThhhhhhhhiiiiiiiissssssss wwwwwwwwoooooooorrrrrrrrkkksssssssshhhhhhhhoooooooopppppppp iiiiiiiissssssss ppppppppaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrtttttttt ooooooooffffffff aaaaaaaa lllllllloooooooonnnnnnnngggggggg---ssssssssttttttttaaaaaaaannnnnnnnddddddddiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg ttttttttrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaddddddddiiiiiiiittttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn
wwwwwwwwiiiiiiiitttttttthhhhhhhhiiiiiiiinnnnnnnn tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee MMMIIDDDD FFFDDDD pppppppprrrrrrrrooooooooggggggggrrrrrrrraaaaaaaammmmmm,,,, ccccccccoooooooommmmmmbbbbbiiiiiiiinnnnnnnniiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg
MMMIIDDDD SSSSSSS66 ccccccccllllllllaaaaaaaassssssssssssssss wwwwwwwwaaaaaaaassssssss iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnvvvvvvvviiiiiiiitttttttteeeeeeeedddddddd ttttttttoooooooo SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo’’ssssssss
tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeeeoooooooorrrrrrrreeeeeeeettttttttiiiiiiiiccccccccaaaaaaaallllllll kkknnnnnnnnoooooooowwwwwwwwlllllllleeeeeeeeddddddddggggggggeeeeeeee aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd pppppppprrrrrrrraaaaaaaaccccccccttttttttiiiiiiiiccccccccaaaaaaaallllllll eeeeeeeexxxppppppppeeeeeeeerrrrrrrriiiiiiiieeeeeeeennnnnnnncccccccceeeeeeee
hhhhhhhheeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaddddddddqquuuuuuuuaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrtttttttteeeeeeeerrrrrrrrssssssss iiiiiiiinnnnnnnn BBiiiiiiiieeeeeeeelllllllleeeeeeeeffffffffeeeeeeeelllllllldddddddd ffffffffoooooooorrrrrrrr aaaaaaaannnnnnnn eeeeeeeennnnnnnnggggggggaaaaaaaaggggggggiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd
iiiiiiiinnnnnnnn aaaaaaaa ccccccccoooooooollllllllllllllllaaaaaaaabbbbboooooooorrrrrrrraaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiivvvvvvvveeeeeeee sssssssseeeeeeeettttttttttttttttiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg... Ovvvvvvvveeeeeeeerrrrrrrraaaaaaaallllllllllllllll,,,, iiiiiiiitttttttt wwwwwwwwaaaaaaaassssssss aaaaaaaannnnnnnn
hhhhhhhhaaaaaaaannnnnnnnddddddddssssssss---oooooooonnnnnnnn wwwwwwwwoooooooorrrrrrrrkkksssssssshhhhhhhhoooooooopppppppp ffffffffooooooooccccccccuuuuuuuusssssssseeeeeeeedddddddd oooooooonnnnnnnn SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo’’ssssssss
eeeeeeeennnnnnnnrrrrrrrriiiiiiiicccccccchhhhhhhhiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg eeeeeeeexxxppppppppeeeeeeeerrrrrrrriiiiiiiieeeeeeeennnnnnnncccccccceeeeeeee tttttttthhhhhhhhaaaaaaaatttttttt eeeeeeeennnnnnnnhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaannnnnnnncccccccceeeeeeeedddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee ssssssssttttttttuuuuuuuuddddddddeeeeeeeennnnnnnnttttttttssssssss'
AAddddddddvvvvvvvvaaaaaaaannnnnnnncccccccceeeeeeeedddddddd FFFaaaaaaaaççaaaaaaaaddddddddeeeeeeee CCoooooooonnnnnnnnssssssssttttttttrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuccccccccttttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn ssssssssyyyyyyyysssssssstttttttteeeeeeeemmmmmm... TTTThhhhhhhheeeeeeee ddddddddaaaaaaaayyyyyyyy
sssssssskkkiiiiiiiillllllllllllllllssssssss iiiiiiiinnnnnnnn ffffffffaaaaaaaaççaaaaaaaaddddddddeeeeeeee ccccccccoooooooonnnnnnnnssssssssttttttttrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuccccccccttttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn..
bbbbbeeeeeeeeggggggggaaaaaaaannnnnnnn wwwwwwwwiiiiiiiitttttttthhhhhhhh aaaaaaaannnnnnnn iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnffffffffoooooooorrrrrrrrmmmmmmaaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiivvvvvvvveeeeeeee tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeeeoooooooorrrrrrrreeeeeeeettttttttiiiiiiiiccccccccaaaaaaaallllllll lllllllleeeeeeeeccccccccttttttttuuuuuuuurrrrrrrreeeeeeee lllllllleeeeeeeedddddddd
bbbbbyyyyyyyy MMMrrrrrrrr... 4lllllllliiiiiiii AArrrrrrrrttttttttmmmmmmaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnn,,,, wwwwwwwwhhhhhhhhoooooooo ddddddddiiiiiiiissssssssccccccccuuuuuuuusssssssssssssssseeeeeeeedddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee
JJeeeeeeeerrrrrrrriiiiiiiinnnnnnnn
JJooooooooy
ccccccccaaaaaaaappppppppaaaaaaaabbbbbiiiiiiiilllllllliiiiiiiittttttttiiiiiiiieeeeeeeessssssss aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnoooooooovvvvvvvvaaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnnssssssss ooooooooffffffff SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo’’ssssssss AAOCC
(MMMIIDDDD SSSSSSS66 – FFFaaaaaaaaççaaaaaaaaddddddddeeeeeeee DDDDeeeeeeeessssssssiiiiiiiiggggggggnnnnnnnn)
ssssssssyyyyyyyysssssssstttttttteeeeeeeemmmmmm..
SSSSSSSttttttttuuuuuuuuddddddddeeeeeeeennnnnnnnttttttttssssssss hhhhhhhhaaaaaaaadddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee uuuuuuuunnnnnnnniiiiiiiiqquuuuuuuueeeeeeee ooooooooppppppppppppppppoooooooorrrrrrrrttttttttuuuuuuuunnnnnnnniiiiiiiittttttttyyyyyyyy ttttttttoooooooo vvvvvvvviiiiiiiissssssssiiiiiiiitttttttt aaaaaaaa
nnnnnnnneeeeeeeewwwwwwwwllllllllyyyyyyyy ccccccccoooooooonnnnnnnnssssssssttttttttrrrrrrrruuuuuuuucccccccctttttttteeeeeeeedddddddd ppppppppaaaaaaaavvvvvvvviiiiiiiilllllllliiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnn tttttttthhhhhhhhaaaaaaaatttttttt uuuuuuuuttttttttiiiiiiiilllllllliiiiiiiizeeeeeeeedddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee
iiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnoooooooovvvvvvvvaaaaaaaattttttttiiiiiiiivvvvvvvveeeeeeee Grrrrrrrriiiiiiiidddddddd--- 2222 ---SSSSSSShhhhhhhheeeeeeeellllllllllllllll ssssssssyyyyyyyysssssssstttttttteeeeeeeemmmmmm,,,, sssssssshhhhhhhhoooooooowwwwwwwwccccccccaaaaaaaassssssssiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee
iiiiiiiimmmmmmpppppppprrrrrrrreeeeeeeessssssssssssssssiiiiiiiivvvvvvvveeeeeeee ffffffffrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeee---ffffffffoooooooorrrrrrrrmmmmmm ppppppppoooooooossssssssssssssssiiiiiiiibbbbbiiiiiiiilllllllliiiiiiiittttttttiiiiiiiieeeeeeeessssssss ooooooooÄeeeeeeeerrrrrrrreeeeeeeedddddddd bbbbbyyyyyyyy tttttttthhhhhhhhiiiiiiiissssssss
ddddddddeeeeeeeessssssssiiiiiiiiggggggggnnnnnnnn aaaaaaaapppppppppppppppprrrrrrrrooooooooaaaaaaaacccccccchhhhhhhh... TTTThhhhhhhhiiiiiiiissssssss vvvvvvvviiiiiiiissssssssiiiiiiiitttttttt aaaaaaaalllllllllllllllloooooooowwwwwwwweeeeeeeedddddddd tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeeemmmmmm ttttttttoooooooo sssssssseeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
hhhhhhhhoooooooowwwwwwww ccccccccuuuuuuuuttttttttttttttttiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg---eeeeeeeeddddddddggggggggeeeeeeee tttttttteeeeeeeecccccccchhhhhhhhnnnnnnnnoooooooollllllllooooooooggggggggyyyyyyyy iiiiiiiissssssss aaaaaaaapppppppppppppppplllllllliiiiiiiieeeeeeeedddddddd iiiiiiiinnnnnnnn rrrrrrrreeeeeeeeaaaaaaaallllllll---
wwwwwwwwoooooooorrrrrrrrlllllllldddddddd
pppppppprrrrrrrroooooooojeeeeeeeeccccccccttttttttssssssss..
FFFoooooooolllllllllllllllloooooooowwwwwwwwiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg aaaaaaaa rrrrrrrreeeeeeeeffffffffrrrrrrrreeeeeeeesssssssshhhhhhhhiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg bbbbbrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeaaaaaaaakkkffffffffaaaaaaaasssssssstttttttt aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd aaaaaaaa ddddddddeeeeeeeelllllllliiiiiiiicccccccciiiiiiiioooooooouuuuuuuussssssss
lllllllluuuuuuuunnnnnnnncccccccchhhhhhhh aaaaaaaatttttttt tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee SSSSSSScccccccchhhhhhhhüüüccccccccoooooooo MMMeeeeeeeennnnnnnnssssssssaaaaaaaa,,,, tttttttthhhhhhhheeeeeeee aaaaaaaafffffffftttttttteeeeeeeerrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnoooooooooooooooonnnnnnnn
EVENTS
Visit to Schüco’s Headquarters / Hands-on Workshop (AOC)
Bielefeld, December 12th 2024
MID-FD students of the third semester were
invited to Schüco’s headquarters in Bielefeld
for an engaging hands-on workshop focused on
Schüco’s most innovative systems. The day began
with an informative theoretical lecture led by Mr.
Ulrich Artmann, who discussed the capabilities
and innovations of Schüco’s AOC system.
Students visited the innovative Grid2Shell pavilion,
showcasing the impressive free-form possibilities
offered by this design approach. This visit allowed
them to see how cutting-edge technology is
applied in real-world projects.
Following a lunch invitation at the Schüco Lounge,
the afternoon session shifted to a hands-on
fabrication workshop. This segment focused on
Schüco Add-on Constructions for timber, where
students actively participated in building a
prototype.
This workshop is part of a long-standing tradition
within the MID-FD program, combining theoretical
knowledge and practical experience in a
collaborative setting.
“This practical experience provided the chance
to gain a deeper understanding of the system‘s
components and installation methods, while also
learning valuable tips from Schüco experts.”
- Jerin Joy
Picture by Jerin Joy and Fady Aziz
EVENTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
105
EVENTS
MID Students at BAU 2025
Munich , January 15th – 17th 2025
In January 2025, first and third-semester
students from the Master of Integrated Design
(MID), specializing in façade and computational
design, made an educational journey to the BAU
2025 exhibition in Munich, the most renowned
construction trade fair in Germany carried out
every second year. This visit provided a valuable
opportunity for students to engage with cuttingedge
innovations shaping the built environment.
For façade design students, the exhibition halls B1,
C1, B2, B5, and C2 were particularly informative
since they engaged with various companies, gaining
insights into façade construction techniques, wall
systems, and industry trends.
A key highlight was the guided tour by Schüco, where
they showed their state-of-the-art façade systems.
Schüco’s exhibit, themed “Value Up”, emphasized
renewable energy solutions, particularly BIPV and
retrofitting systems. These innovations are crucial
for reducing energy consumption in both largescale
commercial buildings and smaller community
spaces.
From left to right: Zahra Tahmasbi, Marie Al
Helou, Anastasiia Krasnikova, Sara
Hemmatyar, and Zahra Parsafar.
The Digital BAU at the C3 exhibit showcased
groundbreaking developments in BIM, AI, and
robotics for the construction industry. One of
the most exciting aspects of this section was
the opportunity to experience live software
demos, allowing to see how these tools enhance
architectural and engineering workflows.
BAU 2025 was more than just an exhibition—it was
an immersive learning experience that connected
students with industry leaders and real-world
applications of architectural innovation.
“For us, as young architects and designers, this
visit reinforced the importance of staying at the
forefront of technological advancements and
sustainability-driven design. As the construction
industry continues to evolve, embracing
digitalization and eco-friendly solutions will be
essential in shaping a more resilient and efficient
built environment.”
Pictures by Kavyashree Govil and Dila Dil
- Kavyashree Govil
106 EVENTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
EVENTS
Presentation at 23rd Docomomo Germany Conference
Bochum, 29th of March 2025
On the 29th of March, the 23rd Docomomo
Germany conference took place at The Faculty
of Architecture at Bochum University of Applied
Sciences. The conference theme was the
interaction between education, training and the
architecture of the modern movement.
Guests from Germany and abroad with academic,
practical, activist and, of course, pedagogical
backgrounds provided an overview of the current
status in the field of “Education - Modern
Movement - Training“ in lectures, analyses,
reflections, practical reports and designs, as well
as the role that Docomomo already plays in this
context and can play in the future.
Prof. ir. Michel Melenhorst and Dipl. Ing. Janine
Tüchsen, from the contextual design department
of the Detmold School of Design, compiled the
conference programme. Student work from TH
OWL on Sustainable Campus and the Modern
Movement, Innovation Communication, Research
and Design are presented during the Conference.
The project “Re-Use” is part of the Master‘s program
MArch at TH OWL and focuses on conceptual
strategies for the sustainable transformation
and re-use of existing buildings. At the beginning
of the course, each student group was asked to
select a university, preferably one built in the postwar
period. Throughout the semester, the groups
worked on the assigned task using their chosen
university as an exemplary case study. During the
conference the contributions of the students were
presented. Raissa Haferkamp, Suara Sen, Andrea
Klein presented Kassel; Marion Bauer, Marysé
Mäding, Gül Gelöz, Evelin Focht presented Höxter;
David Böckmann, Gina-Sophie Bories, Muriel
Rummenie presented Bochum; Elmas Uprak, Ilayda
Gül Sari, Natalia Tandara, Lara Meyer presented
Bielefeld. At the end of the session, doctoral
students Nathania Nadia and Aylin Erol from TH
OWL and Promotionskolleg NRW presented their
dissertation topic on modern movement at the
conference.
- David Böckmann and Aylin Erol Picture by Aylin Erol
EVENTS
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
107
IMPRINT
Publisher
OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts
IDS Institute for Design Strategies
Emilienstraße 45, D-32756 Detmold, Germany
Editors
Alvaro Balderrama
Prof. Daniel Arztmann
Layout and Graphics
Aylin Erol
Alvaro Balderrama
Guest Reviewers
Florian Zander
Johanna Götz
Cover
Alvaro Balderrama
Contributions and Illustations
Unless stated otherwise, the illustrations
belong to the respective authors in each
contribution, or to the Editorial Team. The
authors in this report are credited individually
and are responsible for their contribution.
Teaching Department
Façade Construction
Prof. Daniel Arztmann
Contact
IDS Institute for Design Strategies
OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts
Emilienstraße 45, D-32756 Detmold
E-Mail: ids@th-owl.de
Web: www.th-owl.de/ids
Sustainable Façades volume 4
ISSN (Print) 2943-4459
ISSN (Online) 2943-4467
IMPRINT
Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4
MORE FROM US
Sign up for our
newsletter:
Sustainable Façades volume 4
ISSN (Print) 2943-4459
ISSN (Online) 2943-4467